Perceptions of Structural Injustice and Efficacy

Participation in Low/Moderate/High-Cost Forms of Collective Action

Katie E. Corcoran, David Pettinicchio, Jacob Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior studies on perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice, efficacy, and collective action have suffered from two major limitations: (1) they have used single-country samples, usually of economically advanced countries, and (2) generally theorized and investigated perceptions of structural injustice and efficacy separately. Drawing on value-expectancy theory, we provide an integrated theory to predict direct and conditional effects of efficacy and perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice on collective action within countries. To address the limitations of previous research, we use cross-national data of 29 countries, including economically advanced and less advanced nations, to test how well these hypotheses explain within-country variation in collective action. We find that internal efficacy is significantly and positively associated with low- and moderate-cost collective action, whereas organizational embeddedness, a proxy for political efficacy, is significantly and positively associated with low-, moderate-, and high-cost collective action. Perceptions of legitimate and unjust structural disadvantage are also positively associated with all types of collective action. Importantly, the positive effects of both types of efficacy on high-cost collective action are conditional on perceptions of structural injustice. That is, participation in high-cost collective action is more likely for those who are both efficacious and perceive structural disadvantage as unjust.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-461
Number of pages33
JournalSociological Inquiry
Volume85
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

collective behavior
participation
costs
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Perceptions of Structural Injustice and Efficacy : Participation in Low/Moderate/High-Cost Forms of Collective Action. / Corcoran, Katie E.; Pettinicchio, David; Young, Jacob.

In: Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 85, No. 3, 2015, p. 429-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b055ee928fc34fec9f37778f59512a6c,
title = "Perceptions of Structural Injustice and Efficacy: Participation in Low/Moderate/High-Cost Forms of Collective Action",
abstract = "Prior studies on perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice, efficacy, and collective action have suffered from two major limitations: (1) they have used single-country samples, usually of economically advanced countries, and (2) generally theorized and investigated perceptions of structural injustice and efficacy separately. Drawing on value-expectancy theory, we provide an integrated theory to predict direct and conditional effects of efficacy and perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice on collective action within countries. To address the limitations of previous research, we use cross-national data of 29 countries, including economically advanced and less advanced nations, to test how well these hypotheses explain within-country variation in collective action. We find that internal efficacy is significantly and positively associated with low- and moderate-cost collective action, whereas organizational embeddedness, a proxy for political efficacy, is significantly and positively associated with low-, moderate-, and high-cost collective action. Perceptions of legitimate and unjust structural disadvantage are also positively associated with all types of collective action. Importantly, the positive effects of both types of efficacy on high-cost collective action are conditional on perceptions of structural injustice. That is, participation in high-cost collective action is more likely for those who are both efficacious and perceive structural disadvantage as unjust.",
author = "Corcoran, {Katie E.} and David Pettinicchio and Jacob Young",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/soin.12082",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "429--461",
journal = "Sociological Inquiry",
issn = "0038-0245",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of Structural Injustice and Efficacy

T2 - Participation in Low/Moderate/High-Cost Forms of Collective Action

AU - Corcoran, Katie E.

AU - Pettinicchio, David

AU - Young, Jacob

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Prior studies on perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice, efficacy, and collective action have suffered from two major limitations: (1) they have used single-country samples, usually of economically advanced countries, and (2) generally theorized and investigated perceptions of structural injustice and efficacy separately. Drawing on value-expectancy theory, we provide an integrated theory to predict direct and conditional effects of efficacy and perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice on collective action within countries. To address the limitations of previous research, we use cross-national data of 29 countries, including economically advanced and less advanced nations, to test how well these hypotheses explain within-country variation in collective action. We find that internal efficacy is significantly and positively associated with low- and moderate-cost collective action, whereas organizational embeddedness, a proxy for political efficacy, is significantly and positively associated with low-, moderate-, and high-cost collective action. Perceptions of legitimate and unjust structural disadvantage are also positively associated with all types of collective action. Importantly, the positive effects of both types of efficacy on high-cost collective action are conditional on perceptions of structural injustice. That is, participation in high-cost collective action is more likely for those who are both efficacious and perceive structural disadvantage as unjust.

AB - Prior studies on perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice, efficacy, and collective action have suffered from two major limitations: (1) they have used single-country samples, usually of economically advanced countries, and (2) generally theorized and investigated perceptions of structural injustice and efficacy separately. Drawing on value-expectancy theory, we provide an integrated theory to predict direct and conditional effects of efficacy and perceptions of structural disadvantage and injustice on collective action within countries. To address the limitations of previous research, we use cross-national data of 29 countries, including economically advanced and less advanced nations, to test how well these hypotheses explain within-country variation in collective action. We find that internal efficacy is significantly and positively associated with low- and moderate-cost collective action, whereas organizational embeddedness, a proxy for political efficacy, is significantly and positively associated with low-, moderate-, and high-cost collective action. Perceptions of legitimate and unjust structural disadvantage are also positively associated with all types of collective action. Importantly, the positive effects of both types of efficacy on high-cost collective action are conditional on perceptions of structural injustice. That is, participation in high-cost collective action is more likely for those who are both efficacious and perceive structural disadvantage as unjust.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949727602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949727602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/soin.12082

DO - 10.1111/soin.12082

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 429

EP - 461

JO - Sociological Inquiry

JF - Sociological Inquiry

SN - 0038-0245

IS - 3

ER -