Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India

Varun Varma, Jayashree Ratnam, Vinatha Viswanathan, Anand M. Osuri, Jacobus C. Biesmeijer, M. D. Madhusudan, Mahesh Sankaran, Meghna Krishnadas, Deepak Barua, Megha Budruk, Kavita Isvaran, Rajah Jayapal, Jahnavi Joshi, Krithi K. Karanth, Jagdish Krishnaswamy, Raman Kumar, Shomita Mukherjee, Harini Nagendra, Madhura Niphadkar, Nisha Owen & 10 others Navendu Page, Soumya Prasad, Suhel Quader, R. Nandini, V. V. Robin, Steven M. Sait, Manzoor A. Shah, Hema Somanathan, Umesh Srinivasan, Bharath Sundaram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people's perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 "raw" questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India's biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes-"Policy and Governance", "Biodiversity and Endangered Species" and "Protection and Conservation"-accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India's conservation research, action and funding landscape.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-211
Number of pages11
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume187
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015

Fingerprint

biodiversity
India
ecosystems
ecosystem
governance
ecologists
funding
endangered species
researchers
environmental issue
resource
policy
citizen

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Conservation
  • Ecosystems
  • India
  • Perceptions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Varma, V., Ratnam, J., Viswanathan, V., Osuri, A. M., Biesmeijer, J. C., Madhusudan, M. D., ... Sundaram, B. (2015). Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Biological Conservation, 187, 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031

Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. / Varma, Varun; Ratnam, Jayashree; Viswanathan, Vinatha; Osuri, Anand M.; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.; Madhusudan, M. D.; Sankaran, Mahesh; Krishnadas, Meghna; Barua, Deepak; Budruk, Megha; Isvaran, Kavita; Jayapal, Rajah; Joshi, Jahnavi; Karanth, Krithi K.; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish; Kumar, Raman; Mukherjee, Shomita; Nagendra, Harini; Niphadkar, Madhura; Owen, Nisha; Page, Navendu; Prasad, Soumya; Quader, Suhel; Nandini, R.; Robin, V. V.; Sait, Steven M.; Shah, Manzoor A.; Somanathan, Hema; Srinivasan, Umesh; Sundaram, Bharath.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 187, 01.07.2015, p. 201-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Varma, V, Ratnam, J, Viswanathan, V, Osuri, AM, Biesmeijer, JC, Madhusudan, MD, Sankaran, M, Krishnadas, M, Barua, D, Budruk, M, Isvaran, K, Jayapal, R, Joshi, J, Karanth, KK, Krishnaswamy, J, Kumar, R, Mukherjee, S, Nagendra, H, Niphadkar, M, Owen, N, Page, N, Prasad, S, Quader, S, Nandini, R, Robin, VV, Sait, SM, Shah, MA, Somanathan, H, Srinivasan, U & Sundaram, B 2015, 'Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India', Biological Conservation, vol. 187, pp. 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031
Varma V, Ratnam J, Viswanathan V, Osuri AM, Biesmeijer JC, Madhusudan MD et al. Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Biological Conservation. 2015 Jul 1;187:201-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031
Varma, Varun ; Ratnam, Jayashree ; Viswanathan, Vinatha ; Osuri, Anand M. ; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. ; Madhusudan, M. D. ; Sankaran, Mahesh ; Krishnadas, Meghna ; Barua, Deepak ; Budruk, Megha ; Isvaran, Kavita ; Jayapal, Rajah ; Joshi, Jahnavi ; Karanth, Krithi K. ; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish ; Kumar, Raman ; Mukherjee, Shomita ; Nagendra, Harini ; Niphadkar, Madhura ; Owen, Nisha ; Page, Navendu ; Prasad, Soumya ; Quader, Suhel ; Nandini, R. ; Robin, V. V. ; Sait, Steven M. ; Shah, Manzoor A. ; Somanathan, Hema ; Srinivasan, Umesh ; Sundaram, Bharath. / Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. In: Biological Conservation. 2015 ; Vol. 187. pp. 201-211.
@article{0482665d3c124275bd9d42a6e3a0bf30,
title = "Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India",
abstract = "We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people's perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 {"}raw{"} questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India's biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes-{"}Policy and Governance{"}, {"}Biodiversity and Endangered Species{"} and {"}Protection and Conservation{"}-accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India's conservation research, action and funding landscape.",
keywords = "Biodiversity, Conservation, Ecosystems, India, Perceptions",
author = "Varun Varma and Jayashree Ratnam and Vinatha Viswanathan and Osuri, {Anand M.} and Biesmeijer, {Jacobus C.} and Madhusudan, {M. D.} and Mahesh Sankaran and Meghna Krishnadas and Deepak Barua and Megha Budruk and Kavita Isvaran and Rajah Jayapal and Jahnavi Joshi and Karanth, {Krithi K.} and Jagdish Krishnaswamy and Raman Kumar and Shomita Mukherjee and Harini Nagendra and Madhura Niphadkar and Nisha Owen and Navendu Page and Soumya Prasad and Suhel Quader and R. Nandini and Robin, {V. V.} and Sait, {Steven M.} and Shah, {Manzoor A.} and Hema Somanathan and Umesh Srinivasan and Bharath Sundaram",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "201--211",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India

AU - Varma, Varun

AU - Ratnam, Jayashree

AU - Viswanathan, Vinatha

AU - Osuri, Anand M.

AU - Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.

AU - Madhusudan, M. D.

AU - Sankaran, Mahesh

AU - Krishnadas, Meghna

AU - Barua, Deepak

AU - Budruk, Megha

AU - Isvaran, Kavita

AU - Jayapal, Rajah

AU - Joshi, Jahnavi

AU - Karanth, Krithi K.

AU - Krishnaswamy, Jagdish

AU - Kumar, Raman

AU - Mukherjee, Shomita

AU - Nagendra, Harini

AU - Niphadkar, Madhura

AU - Owen, Nisha

AU - Page, Navendu

AU - Prasad, Soumya

AU - Quader, Suhel

AU - Nandini, R.

AU - Robin, V. V.

AU - Sait, Steven M.

AU - Shah, Manzoor A.

AU - Somanathan, Hema

AU - Srinivasan, Umesh

AU - Sundaram, Bharath

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people's perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 "raw" questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India's biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes-"Policy and Governance", "Biodiversity and Endangered Species" and "Protection and Conservation"-accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India's conservation research, action and funding landscape.

AB - We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people's perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 "raw" questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India's biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes-"Policy and Governance", "Biodiversity and Endangered Species" and "Protection and Conservation"-accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India's conservation research, action and funding landscape.

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Conservation

KW - Ecosystems

KW - India

KW - Perceptions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929417795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929417795&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031

M3 - Article

VL - 187

SP - 201

EP - 211

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -