Perceived self-regulation of exercise goals and interfering goals among regular and irregular exercisers: A life space analysis

Paul Karoly, Linda S. Ruehlman, Morris A. Okun, Rafer S. Lutz, Craig Newton, Chris Fairholme

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether adults self-classified as regular and irregular exercisers tend to differentially perceive the self-regulation of their exercise goals (a between groups comparison) and whether the groups' differ in their self-regulatory perceptions of an exercise goal versus a goal that strongly interferes with exercise (a within groups comparison). Designs: Cross-Sectional Survey. Methods: College studen ts (N=399, 66% female), who were either regular or irregular exercisers, completed the Goal Systems Assessment Battery [GSAB; Karoly, P., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1995). Goal cognition and its clinical implications: Development and preliminary validation of four motivational assessment instruments. Assessment, 2, 113-129] for the goal of exercise and for a self-selected interfering goal. The GSAB gauges how individuals evaluate multiple functional components of self-regulation. Results: A doubly multivariate MANOVA revealed a signi ficant interaction between exercise regularity and goal type. Irregular exercisers manifested a pattern of goal regulatory thinking favoring their interfering goal relative to their exercise goal with respect to its value and the extent of their monitoring, planning, social comparison, and self-rewarding their progress toward that goal. Regular exercisers tended not to make such regulatory distinctions. Conclusions : Although life pursuits identified as interfering with exercise (e.g. academic goals) generally require more of a psychological investment than engaging in exercise, regular exercisers tend to construe their physical activity goals in a manner that closely matches their ratings of competing life aspirations. A dual focus on exercise goals and their aspirational rivals may inform motivational theory and intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-442
Number of pages16
JournalPsychology of Sport and Exercise
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2005

Fingerprint

self-regulation
social planning
Group
regularity
cognition
rating
monitoring
interaction
Self-Control
Values
Cognition
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • Goals
  • Life space analysis
  • Motivation
  • Self-regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Applied Psychology
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Perceived self-regulation of exercise goals and interfering goals among regular and irregular exercisers : A life space analysis. / Karoly, Paul; Ruehlman, Linda S.; Okun, Morris A.; Lutz, Rafer S.; Newton, Craig; Fairholme, Chris.

In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Vol. 6, No. 4, 07.2005, p. 427-442.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karoly, Paul ; Ruehlman, Linda S. ; Okun, Morris A. ; Lutz, Rafer S. ; Newton, Craig ; Fairholme, Chris. / Perceived self-regulation of exercise goals and interfering goals among regular and irregular exercisers : A life space analysis. In: Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2005 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 427-442.
@article{feed4759fe3746e6af6539b0074eab19,
title = "Perceived self-regulation of exercise goals and interfering goals among regular and irregular exercisers: A life space analysis",
abstract = "Objectives: To investigate whether adults self-classified as regular and irregular exercisers tend to differentially perceive the self-regulation of their exercise goals (a between groups comparison) and whether the groups' differ in their self-regulatory perceptions of an exercise goal versus a goal that strongly interferes with exercise (a within groups comparison). Designs: Cross-Sectional Survey. Methods: College studen ts (N=399, 66{\%} female), who were either regular or irregular exercisers, completed the Goal Systems Assessment Battery [GSAB; Karoly, P., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1995). Goal cognition and its clinical implications: Development and preliminary validation of four motivational assessment instruments. Assessment, 2, 113-129] for the goal of exercise and for a self-selected interfering goal. The GSAB gauges how individuals evaluate multiple functional components of self-regulation. Results: A doubly multivariate MANOVA revealed a signi ficant interaction between exercise regularity and goal type. Irregular exercisers manifested a pattern of goal regulatory thinking favoring their interfering goal relative to their exercise goal with respect to its value and the extent of their monitoring, planning, social comparison, and self-rewarding their progress toward that goal. Regular exercisers tended not to make such regulatory distinctions. Conclusions : Although life pursuits identified as interfering with exercise (e.g. academic goals) generally require more of a psychological investment than engaging in exercise, regular exercisers tend to construe their physical activity goals in a manner that closely matches their ratings of competing life aspirations. A dual focus on exercise goals and their aspirational rivals may inform motivational theory and intervention.",
keywords = "Exercise, Goals, Life space analysis, Motivation, Self-regulation",
author = "Paul Karoly and Ruehlman, {Linda S.} and Okun, {Morris A.} and Lutz, {Rafer S.} and Craig Newton and Chris Fairholme",
year = "2005",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "427--442",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived self-regulation of exercise goals and interfering goals among regular and irregular exercisers

T2 - A life space analysis

AU - Karoly, Paul

AU - Ruehlman, Linda S.

AU - Okun, Morris A.

AU - Lutz, Rafer S.

AU - Newton, Craig

AU - Fairholme, Chris

PY - 2005/7

Y1 - 2005/7

N2 - Objectives: To investigate whether adults self-classified as regular and irregular exercisers tend to differentially perceive the self-regulation of their exercise goals (a between groups comparison) and whether the groups' differ in their self-regulatory perceptions of an exercise goal versus a goal that strongly interferes with exercise (a within groups comparison). Designs: Cross-Sectional Survey. Methods: College studen ts (N=399, 66% female), who were either regular or irregular exercisers, completed the Goal Systems Assessment Battery [GSAB; Karoly, P., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1995). Goal cognition and its clinical implications: Development and preliminary validation of four motivational assessment instruments. Assessment, 2, 113-129] for the goal of exercise and for a self-selected interfering goal. The GSAB gauges how individuals evaluate multiple functional components of self-regulation. Results: A doubly multivariate MANOVA revealed a signi ficant interaction between exercise regularity and goal type. Irregular exercisers manifested a pattern of goal regulatory thinking favoring their interfering goal relative to their exercise goal with respect to its value and the extent of their monitoring, planning, social comparison, and self-rewarding their progress toward that goal. Regular exercisers tended not to make such regulatory distinctions. Conclusions : Although life pursuits identified as interfering with exercise (e.g. academic goals) generally require more of a psychological investment than engaging in exercise, regular exercisers tend to construe their physical activity goals in a manner that closely matches their ratings of competing life aspirations. A dual focus on exercise goals and their aspirational rivals may inform motivational theory and intervention.

AB - Objectives: To investigate whether adults self-classified as regular and irregular exercisers tend to differentially perceive the self-regulation of their exercise goals (a between groups comparison) and whether the groups' differ in their self-regulatory perceptions of an exercise goal versus a goal that strongly interferes with exercise (a within groups comparison). Designs: Cross-Sectional Survey. Methods: College studen ts (N=399, 66% female), who were either regular or irregular exercisers, completed the Goal Systems Assessment Battery [GSAB; Karoly, P., & Ruehlman, L. S. (1995). Goal cognition and its clinical implications: Development and preliminary validation of four motivational assessment instruments. Assessment, 2, 113-129] for the goal of exercise and for a self-selected interfering goal. The GSAB gauges how individuals evaluate multiple functional components of self-regulation. Results: A doubly multivariate MANOVA revealed a signi ficant interaction between exercise regularity and goal type. Irregular exercisers manifested a pattern of goal regulatory thinking favoring their interfering goal relative to their exercise goal with respect to its value and the extent of their monitoring, planning, social comparison, and self-rewarding their progress toward that goal. Regular exercisers tended not to make such regulatory distinctions. Conclusions : Although life pursuits identified as interfering with exercise (e.g. academic goals) generally require more of a psychological investment than engaging in exercise, regular exercisers tend to construe their physical activity goals in a manner that closely matches their ratings of competing life aspirations. A dual focus on exercise goals and their aspirational rivals may inform motivational theory and intervention.

KW - Exercise

KW - Goals

KW - Life space analysis

KW - Motivation

KW - Self-regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18144378783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18144378783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2004.03.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:18144378783

VL - 6

SP - 427

EP - 442

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

IS - 4

ER -