People We Hire as Executioners: Who Are They? Who Are We?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Christopher Bennett has introduced a new inquiry into the capital punishment debate by looking at whether the role of executioner is one in which it is possible and proper to take pride. He argues that this will depend on the kind of justifications that an executioner can offer in defense of his role and takes as an example the English executioner Albert Pierrepoint as portrayed in the film Pierrepoint: The Last Hangman. Bennett claims that none of the justifications available to Pierrepoint are adequate, that his pride in his role was unjustified, and that this gives us reason to doubt those justifications for capital punishment. I am unpersuaded by Bennett’s arguments and give reasons for thinking that the role of executioner can under certain circumstances be an honorable vocation in which one may legitimately take pride.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalCriminal Justice Ethics
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - Jul 9 2016

    Fingerprint

    penalty

    Keywords

    • capital punishment
    • deterrence
    • executioner
    • killing
    • murder
    • Pierrepoint
    • retribution
    • virtue theory

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law

    Cite this

    People We Hire as Executioners : Who Are They? Who Are We? / Murphy, Jeffrie.

    In: Criminal Justice Ethics, 09.07.2016, p. 1-13.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{d19b4567284c417d94fae31bade0a79f,
    title = "People We Hire as Executioners: Who Are They? Who Are We?",
    abstract = "Christopher Bennett has introduced a new inquiry into the capital punishment debate by looking at whether the role of executioner is one in which it is possible and proper to take pride. He argues that this will depend on the kind of justifications that an executioner can offer in defense of his role and takes as an example the English executioner Albert Pierrepoint as portrayed in the film Pierrepoint: The Last Hangman. Bennett claims that none of the justifications available to Pierrepoint are adequate, that his pride in his role was unjustified, and that this gives us reason to doubt those justifications for capital punishment. I am unpersuaded by Bennett’s arguments and give reasons for thinking that the role of executioner can under certain circumstances be an honorable vocation in which one may legitimately take pride.",
    keywords = "capital punishment, deterrence, executioner, killing, murder, Pierrepoint, retribution, virtue theory",
    author = "Jeffrie Murphy",
    year = "2016",
    month = "7",
    day = "9",
    doi = "10.1080/0731129X.2016.1189163",
    language = "English (US)",
    pages = "1--13",
    journal = "Criminal Justice Ethics",
    issn = "0731-129X",
    publisher = "Institute for Criminal Justice Ethics",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - People We Hire as Executioners

    T2 - Who Are They? Who Are We?

    AU - Murphy, Jeffrie

    PY - 2016/7/9

    Y1 - 2016/7/9

    N2 - Christopher Bennett has introduced a new inquiry into the capital punishment debate by looking at whether the role of executioner is one in which it is possible and proper to take pride. He argues that this will depend on the kind of justifications that an executioner can offer in defense of his role and takes as an example the English executioner Albert Pierrepoint as portrayed in the film Pierrepoint: The Last Hangman. Bennett claims that none of the justifications available to Pierrepoint are adequate, that his pride in his role was unjustified, and that this gives us reason to doubt those justifications for capital punishment. I am unpersuaded by Bennett’s arguments and give reasons for thinking that the role of executioner can under certain circumstances be an honorable vocation in which one may legitimately take pride.

    AB - Christopher Bennett has introduced a new inquiry into the capital punishment debate by looking at whether the role of executioner is one in which it is possible and proper to take pride. He argues that this will depend on the kind of justifications that an executioner can offer in defense of his role and takes as an example the English executioner Albert Pierrepoint as portrayed in the film Pierrepoint: The Last Hangman. Bennett claims that none of the justifications available to Pierrepoint are adequate, that his pride in his role was unjustified, and that this gives us reason to doubt those justifications for capital punishment. I am unpersuaded by Bennett’s arguments and give reasons for thinking that the role of executioner can under certain circumstances be an honorable vocation in which one may legitimately take pride.

    KW - capital punishment

    KW - deterrence

    KW - executioner

    KW - killing

    KW - murder

    KW - Pierrepoint

    KW - retribution

    KW - virtue theory

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978086885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978086885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/0731129X.2016.1189163

    DO - 10.1080/0731129X.2016.1189163

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84978086885

    SP - 1

    EP - 13

    JO - Criminal Justice Ethics

    JF - Criminal Justice Ethics

    SN - 0731-129X

    ER -