Paying for infrastructure in the post-recession era: Exploring the use of alternative funding and financing tools

Akheil Singla, Jason Shumberger, David Swindell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While municipalities in the United States face many challenges, one of the most critical is an aging stock of infrastructure. Concurrent with this issue is a new fiscal reality where local governments face unfunded pension liabilities, difficulties in raising revenues, and potentially declining state and federal support. As a result, meeting infrastructure needs may require alternative strategies (e.g., green bonds or social impact bonds, public-private partnerships, or privatization) beyond traditional financing mechanisms like general obligation bonds. Though these tools are available to a wide range of governments, not much is known about how frequently they are used and why some governments choose to use them while others do not. Using a survey of local governments, this research explores the extent to which cities are already using or considering using alternative tools to meet their infrastructure needs and the factors associated with the decision to use or pursue using those tools. It finds that the factors associated with the use of these tools are dependent on the nature and type of tool, with alternative funding tools like developer fees more associated with a decline in political support for municipal bonds and alternative financing tools like green bonds associated with budgetary imbalances.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

recession
funding
infrastructure
local government
public-private partnership
social impact
liability
privatization
political support
public private partnership
pension
financing
social effects
fee
municipality
obligation
revenue
need

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

@article{2ed9d8932c214337b82bf539da6131c1,
title = "Paying for infrastructure in the post-recession era: Exploring the use of alternative funding and financing tools",
abstract = "While municipalities in the United States face many challenges, one of the most critical is an aging stock of infrastructure. Concurrent with this issue is a new fiscal reality where local governments face unfunded pension liabilities, difficulties in raising revenues, and potentially declining state and federal support. As a result, meeting infrastructure needs may require alternative strategies (e.g., green bonds or social impact bonds, public-private partnerships, or privatization) beyond traditional financing mechanisms like general obligation bonds. Though these tools are available to a wide range of governments, not much is known about how frequently they are used and why some governments choose to use them while others do not. Using a survey of local governments, this research explores the extent to which cities are already using or considering using alternative tools to meet their infrastructure needs and the factors associated with the decision to use or pursue using those tools. It finds that the factors associated with the use of these tools are dependent on the nature and type of tool, with alternative funding tools like developer fees more associated with a decline in political support for municipal bonds and alternative financing tools like green bonds associated with budgetary imbalances.",
author = "Akheil Singla and Jason Shumberger and David Swindell",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/07352166.2019.1660580",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Urban Affairs",
issn = "0735-2166",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paying for infrastructure in the post-recession era

T2 - Exploring the use of alternative funding and financing tools

AU - Singla, Akheil

AU - Shumberger, Jason

AU - Swindell, David

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - While municipalities in the United States face many challenges, one of the most critical is an aging stock of infrastructure. Concurrent with this issue is a new fiscal reality where local governments face unfunded pension liabilities, difficulties in raising revenues, and potentially declining state and federal support. As a result, meeting infrastructure needs may require alternative strategies (e.g., green bonds or social impact bonds, public-private partnerships, or privatization) beyond traditional financing mechanisms like general obligation bonds. Though these tools are available to a wide range of governments, not much is known about how frequently they are used and why some governments choose to use them while others do not. Using a survey of local governments, this research explores the extent to which cities are already using or considering using alternative tools to meet their infrastructure needs and the factors associated with the decision to use or pursue using those tools. It finds that the factors associated with the use of these tools are dependent on the nature and type of tool, with alternative funding tools like developer fees more associated with a decline in political support for municipal bonds and alternative financing tools like green bonds associated with budgetary imbalances.

AB - While municipalities in the United States face many challenges, one of the most critical is an aging stock of infrastructure. Concurrent with this issue is a new fiscal reality where local governments face unfunded pension liabilities, difficulties in raising revenues, and potentially declining state and federal support. As a result, meeting infrastructure needs may require alternative strategies (e.g., green bonds or social impact bonds, public-private partnerships, or privatization) beyond traditional financing mechanisms like general obligation bonds. Though these tools are available to a wide range of governments, not much is known about how frequently they are used and why some governments choose to use them while others do not. Using a survey of local governments, this research explores the extent to which cities are already using or considering using alternative tools to meet their infrastructure needs and the factors associated with the decision to use or pursue using those tools. It finds that the factors associated with the use of these tools are dependent on the nature and type of tool, with alternative funding tools like developer fees more associated with a decline in political support for municipal bonds and alternative financing tools like green bonds associated with budgetary imbalances.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074344457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074344457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07352166.2019.1660580

DO - 10.1080/07352166.2019.1660580

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074344457

JO - Journal of Urban Affairs

JF - Journal of Urban Affairs

SN - 0735-2166

ER -