Pay-for-performance conservation using swat highlights need for field-level agricultural conservation

Rebecca Muenich, M. M. Kalcic, J. Winsten, K. Fisher, M. Day, G. O'Neil, Y. C. Wang, D. Scavia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a relatively new approach to agricultural conservation that attaches an incentive payment to quantified reductions in nutrient runoff from a participating farm. Similar to a payment for ecosystem services approach, PFP lends itself to providing incentives for the most beneficial practices at the field level. To date, PFP conservation in the U.S. has only been applied in small pilot programs. Because monitoring conservation performance for each field enrolled in a program would be cost-prohibitive, field-level modeling can provide cost-effective estimates of anticipated improvements in nutrient runoff. We developed a PFP system that uses a unique application of one of the leading agricultural models, the USDA's Soil and Water Assessment Tool, to evaluate the nutrient load reductions of potential farm practice changes based on field-level agronomic and management data. The initial phase of the project focused on simulating individual fields in the River Raisin watershed in southeastern Michigan. Here we present development of the modeling approach and results from the pilot year, 2015-2016. These results stress that (1) there is variability in practice effectiveness both within and between farms, and thus there is not one "best practice" for all farms, (2) conservation decisions are made most effectively at the scale of the farm field rather than the sub-watershed or watershed level, and (3) detailed, field-level management information is needed to accurately model and manage on-farm nutrient loadings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1925-1937
Number of pages13
JournalTransactions of the ASABE
Volume60
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Incentive Reimbursement
Farms
Conservation
farm
Nutrients
farms
Watersheds
Food
nutrient
watershed
Runoff
Information management
pollution load
Motivation
incentive
runoff
Costs and Cost Analysis
United States Department of Agriculture
Information Management
information management

Keywords

  • Agricultural conservation
  • Pay-for-performance
  • Phosphorus
  • River Raisin
  • SWAT
  • Western basin of Lake Erie

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Food Science
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Soil Science

Cite this

Muenich, R., Kalcic, M. M., Winsten, J., Fisher, K., Day, M., O'Neil, G., ... Scavia, D. (2017). Pay-for-performance conservation using swat highlights need for field-level agricultural conservation. Transactions of the ASABE, 60(6), 1925-1937.

Pay-for-performance conservation using swat highlights need for field-level agricultural conservation. / Muenich, Rebecca; Kalcic, M. M.; Winsten, J.; Fisher, K.; Day, M.; O'Neil, G.; Wang, Y. C.; Scavia, D.

In: Transactions of the ASABE, Vol. 60, No. 6, 01.01.2017, p. 1925-1937.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Muenich, R, Kalcic, MM, Winsten, J, Fisher, K, Day, M, O'Neil, G, Wang, YC & Scavia, D 2017, 'Pay-for-performance conservation using swat highlights need for field-level agricultural conservation', Transactions of the ASABE, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1925-1937.
Muenich, Rebecca ; Kalcic, M. M. ; Winsten, J. ; Fisher, K. ; Day, M. ; O'Neil, G. ; Wang, Y. C. ; Scavia, D. / Pay-for-performance conservation using swat highlights need for field-level agricultural conservation. In: Transactions of the ASABE. 2017 ; Vol. 60, No. 6. pp. 1925-1937.
@article{80794b2c3f23435ba4c29dded79cbd9b,
title = "Pay-for-performance conservation using swat highlights need for field-level agricultural conservation",
abstract = "Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a relatively new approach to agricultural conservation that attaches an incentive payment to quantified reductions in nutrient runoff from a participating farm. Similar to a payment for ecosystem services approach, PFP lends itself to providing incentives for the most beneficial practices at the field level. To date, PFP conservation in the U.S. has only been applied in small pilot programs. Because monitoring conservation performance for each field enrolled in a program would be cost-prohibitive, field-level modeling can provide cost-effective estimates of anticipated improvements in nutrient runoff. We developed a PFP system that uses a unique application of one of the leading agricultural models, the USDA's Soil and Water Assessment Tool, to evaluate the nutrient load reductions of potential farm practice changes based on field-level agronomic and management data. The initial phase of the project focused on simulating individual fields in the River Raisin watershed in southeastern Michigan. Here we present development of the modeling approach and results from the pilot year, 2015-2016. These results stress that (1) there is variability in practice effectiveness both within and between farms, and thus there is not one {"}best practice{"} for all farms, (2) conservation decisions are made most effectively at the scale of the farm field rather than the sub-watershed or watershed level, and (3) detailed, field-level management information is needed to accurately model and manage on-farm nutrient loadings.",
keywords = "Agricultural conservation, Pay-for-performance, Phosphorus, River Raisin, SWAT, Western basin of Lake Erie",
author = "Rebecca Muenich and Kalcic, {M. M.} and J. Winsten and K. Fisher and M. Day and G. O'Neil and Wang, {Y. C.} and D. Scavia",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "1925--1937",
journal = "Transactions of the ASABE",
issn = "2151-0032",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pay-for-performance conservation using swat highlights need for field-level agricultural conservation

AU - Muenich, Rebecca

AU - Kalcic, M. M.

AU - Winsten, J.

AU - Fisher, K.

AU - Day, M.

AU - O'Neil, G.

AU - Wang, Y. C.

AU - Scavia, D.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a relatively new approach to agricultural conservation that attaches an incentive payment to quantified reductions in nutrient runoff from a participating farm. Similar to a payment for ecosystem services approach, PFP lends itself to providing incentives for the most beneficial practices at the field level. To date, PFP conservation in the U.S. has only been applied in small pilot programs. Because monitoring conservation performance for each field enrolled in a program would be cost-prohibitive, field-level modeling can provide cost-effective estimates of anticipated improvements in nutrient runoff. We developed a PFP system that uses a unique application of one of the leading agricultural models, the USDA's Soil and Water Assessment Tool, to evaluate the nutrient load reductions of potential farm practice changes based on field-level agronomic and management data. The initial phase of the project focused on simulating individual fields in the River Raisin watershed in southeastern Michigan. Here we present development of the modeling approach and results from the pilot year, 2015-2016. These results stress that (1) there is variability in practice effectiveness both within and between farms, and thus there is not one "best practice" for all farms, (2) conservation decisions are made most effectively at the scale of the farm field rather than the sub-watershed or watershed level, and (3) detailed, field-level management information is needed to accurately model and manage on-farm nutrient loadings.

AB - Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a relatively new approach to agricultural conservation that attaches an incentive payment to quantified reductions in nutrient runoff from a participating farm. Similar to a payment for ecosystem services approach, PFP lends itself to providing incentives for the most beneficial practices at the field level. To date, PFP conservation in the U.S. has only been applied in small pilot programs. Because monitoring conservation performance for each field enrolled in a program would be cost-prohibitive, field-level modeling can provide cost-effective estimates of anticipated improvements in nutrient runoff. We developed a PFP system that uses a unique application of one of the leading agricultural models, the USDA's Soil and Water Assessment Tool, to evaluate the nutrient load reductions of potential farm practice changes based on field-level agronomic and management data. The initial phase of the project focused on simulating individual fields in the River Raisin watershed in southeastern Michigan. Here we present development of the modeling approach and results from the pilot year, 2015-2016. These results stress that (1) there is variability in practice effectiveness both within and between farms, and thus there is not one "best practice" for all farms, (2) conservation decisions are made most effectively at the scale of the farm field rather than the sub-watershed or watershed level, and (3) detailed, field-level management information is needed to accurately model and manage on-farm nutrient loadings.

KW - Agricultural conservation

KW - Pay-for-performance

KW - Phosphorus

KW - River Raisin

KW - SWAT

KW - Western basin of Lake Erie

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040032940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040032940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040032940

VL - 60

SP - 1925

EP - 1937

JO - Transactions of the ASABE

JF - Transactions of the ASABE

SN - 2151-0032

IS - 6

ER -