Patient and provider assessments of adherence and the sources of disparities: Evidence from diabetes care

Karen E. Lutfey, Jonathan Ketcham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To (1) compare diabetes patients' self-assessments of adherence with their providers' assessments; (2) determine whether there are systematic differences between the two for certain types of patients; and (3) consider how the cognitive processing that providers use to assess adherence might explain these differences. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary survey data were collected in 1998 from 156 patient provider pairs in two subspecialty endocrinology clinics in a large Midwestern city. Study Design. Data were collected in a cross-sectional survey study design. Providers were surveyed immediately after seeing each diabetes patient, and patients were surveyed via telephone within 1 week of clinic visits. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Bivariate descriptive results and multivariate regression analyses are used to examine how patient characteristics relate to four measures of overall adherence assessments: (1) patients' self-assessments; (2) providers' assessments of patient adherence; (3) differences between those assessments; and (4) absolute values of those differences. Principal Findings. Patient self-assessments are almost entirely independent of observable characteristics such as sex, race, and age. Provider assessments vary with observable characteristics such as patient race and age but not with less readily observable factors such as education and income. For black patients, we observe that relative to white patients, providers' assessments are significantly farther away from-although not systematically farther above or below-patients' self-assessments. Conclusions. Providers appear to rely on observable cues, particularly age and race, to make inferences about an individual patient's adherence. These findings point to a need for further research of various types of provider cognitive processing, particularly in terms of distinguishing between prejudice and uncertainty. If disparities in assessment stem more from information and communication problems than from provider prejudice, policy interventions should facilitate providers' systematic acquisition and processing of information, particularly for some types of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1803-1817
Number of pages15
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume40
Issue number6 I
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2005

Fingerprint

chronic illness
self-assessment
evidence
prejudice
Patient Compliance
large city
telephone
Cross-Sectional Studies
uncertainty
income
regression
Endocrinology
Information Storage and Retrieval
communication
Ambulatory Care
Automatic Data Processing
Telephone
Uncertainty
Cues
Multivariate Analysis

Keywords

  • Adherence
  • Chronic disease
  • Clinical encounter
  • Racial/ethnic differences in health and health care
  • Statistical discrimination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Patient and provider assessments of adherence and the sources of disparities : Evidence from diabetes care. / Lutfey, Karen E.; Ketcham, Jonathan.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 40, No. 6 I, 12.2005, p. 1803-1817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a511c64132b43d582421f38c6a2d74c,
title = "Patient and provider assessments of adherence and the sources of disparities: Evidence from diabetes care",
abstract = "Objective. To (1) compare diabetes patients' self-assessments of adherence with their providers' assessments; (2) determine whether there are systematic differences between the two for certain types of patients; and (3) consider how the cognitive processing that providers use to assess adherence might explain these differences. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary survey data were collected in 1998 from 156 patient provider pairs in two subspecialty endocrinology clinics in a large Midwestern city. Study Design. Data were collected in a cross-sectional survey study design. Providers were surveyed immediately after seeing each diabetes patient, and patients were surveyed via telephone within 1 week of clinic visits. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Bivariate descriptive results and multivariate regression analyses are used to examine how patient characteristics relate to four measures of overall adherence assessments: (1) patients' self-assessments; (2) providers' assessments of patient adherence; (3) differences between those assessments; and (4) absolute values of those differences. Principal Findings. Patient self-assessments are almost entirely independent of observable characteristics such as sex, race, and age. Provider assessments vary with observable characteristics such as patient race and age but not with less readily observable factors such as education and income. For black patients, we observe that relative to white patients, providers' assessments are significantly farther away from-although not systematically farther above or below-patients' self-assessments. Conclusions. Providers appear to rely on observable cues, particularly age and race, to make inferences about an individual patient's adherence. These findings point to a need for further research of various types of provider cognitive processing, particularly in terms of distinguishing between prejudice and uncertainty. If disparities in assessment stem more from information and communication problems than from provider prejudice, policy interventions should facilitate providers' systematic acquisition and processing of information, particularly for some types of patients.",
keywords = "Adherence, Chronic disease, Clinical encounter, Racial/ethnic differences in health and health care, Statistical discrimination",
author = "Lutfey, {Karen E.} and Jonathan Ketcham",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00433.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1803--1817",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6 I",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient and provider assessments of adherence and the sources of disparities

T2 - Evidence from diabetes care

AU - Lutfey, Karen E.

AU - Ketcham, Jonathan

PY - 2005/12

Y1 - 2005/12

N2 - Objective. To (1) compare diabetes patients' self-assessments of adherence with their providers' assessments; (2) determine whether there are systematic differences between the two for certain types of patients; and (3) consider how the cognitive processing that providers use to assess adherence might explain these differences. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary survey data were collected in 1998 from 156 patient provider pairs in two subspecialty endocrinology clinics in a large Midwestern city. Study Design. Data were collected in a cross-sectional survey study design. Providers were surveyed immediately after seeing each diabetes patient, and patients were surveyed via telephone within 1 week of clinic visits. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Bivariate descriptive results and multivariate regression analyses are used to examine how patient characteristics relate to four measures of overall adherence assessments: (1) patients' self-assessments; (2) providers' assessments of patient adherence; (3) differences between those assessments; and (4) absolute values of those differences. Principal Findings. Patient self-assessments are almost entirely independent of observable characteristics such as sex, race, and age. Provider assessments vary with observable characteristics such as patient race and age but not with less readily observable factors such as education and income. For black patients, we observe that relative to white patients, providers' assessments are significantly farther away from-although not systematically farther above or below-patients' self-assessments. Conclusions. Providers appear to rely on observable cues, particularly age and race, to make inferences about an individual patient's adherence. These findings point to a need for further research of various types of provider cognitive processing, particularly in terms of distinguishing between prejudice and uncertainty. If disparities in assessment stem more from information and communication problems than from provider prejudice, policy interventions should facilitate providers' systematic acquisition and processing of information, particularly for some types of patients.

AB - Objective. To (1) compare diabetes patients' self-assessments of adherence with their providers' assessments; (2) determine whether there are systematic differences between the two for certain types of patients; and (3) consider how the cognitive processing that providers use to assess adherence might explain these differences. Data Sources/Study Setting. Primary survey data were collected in 1998 from 156 patient provider pairs in two subspecialty endocrinology clinics in a large Midwestern city. Study Design. Data were collected in a cross-sectional survey study design. Providers were surveyed immediately after seeing each diabetes patient, and patients were surveyed via telephone within 1 week of clinic visits. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Bivariate descriptive results and multivariate regression analyses are used to examine how patient characteristics relate to four measures of overall adherence assessments: (1) patients' self-assessments; (2) providers' assessments of patient adherence; (3) differences between those assessments; and (4) absolute values of those differences. Principal Findings. Patient self-assessments are almost entirely independent of observable characteristics such as sex, race, and age. Provider assessments vary with observable characteristics such as patient race and age but not with less readily observable factors such as education and income. For black patients, we observe that relative to white patients, providers' assessments are significantly farther away from-although not systematically farther above or below-patients' self-assessments. Conclusions. Providers appear to rely on observable cues, particularly age and race, to make inferences about an individual patient's adherence. These findings point to a need for further research of various types of provider cognitive processing, particularly in terms of distinguishing between prejudice and uncertainty. If disparities in assessment stem more from information and communication problems than from provider prejudice, policy interventions should facilitate providers' systematic acquisition and processing of information, particularly for some types of patients.

KW - Adherence

KW - Chronic disease

KW - Clinical encounter

KW - Racial/ethnic differences in health and health care

KW - Statistical discrimination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144517465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144517465&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00433.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00433.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 16336549

AN - SCOPUS:29144517465

VL - 40

SP - 1803

EP - 1817

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 6 I

ER -