Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix

Eric M. McFadden, James J. Ernzen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The benefits,limitations and drawbacks of partnering versus not partnering public construction projects in US are discussed. Partnering allows design and construction teams to synergize as a teamtohance verallproject quality and timely completion. According to the data analyzed, partnered projects out-performed non-partnered projects in cost growth in the $0 to$5 million range only.The partnering process had a positive effect in minimizing liquidated damages.Non-partnered projects had fewer number of tasksthan partnered projects which could be attributed to the increased efforts by the contractor on the partnered projects to find mutually agreeale solutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationConstruction Research Cogress, Winds of Change
Subtitle of host publicationIntegration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress
EditorsK.R. Molenaar, P.S. Chinowsky
Pages741-749
Number of pages9
StatePublished - Dec 1 2003
EventConstruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress - Honolulu, HI., United States
Duration: Mar 19 2003Mar 21 2003

Publication series

NameContruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress

Other

OtherConstruction Research Congress, Winds of Change: Integration and Innovation in Construction, Proceedings of the Congress
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityHonolulu, HI.
Period3/19/033/21/03

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Engineering(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Partnered Project Performance At The City Of Phoenix'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this