Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission

David Tomblin, Rick Worthington, Gretchen Gano, Mahmud Farooque, David Sittenfeld, David Guston, Jason Lloyd, Zachary Pirtle, Jason Kessler, Erin Mahoney, Amy Kaminski, Michele Gates

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a method to gain public perspective about issues related to engineering and technology. pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform early engineering decisions. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA's Asteroid Initiative, which includes the Asteroid Grand Challenge and the Asteroid Redirect Mission. The goal of the forum was to assess citizens' values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA's Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect the demographics of each state. The full forums included sessions on asteroid detection, planetary defense, NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) deliberation. Citizens were given background information about two options for performing the ARM mission that, in 2014, NASA was actively assessing before making a downselect decision. Option A involved capturing a 10m diameter asteroid, redirecting it to lunar orbit, and sending astronauts to investigate and sample it. Option B involved capturing a several meter diameter boulder from the surface of a much larger asteroid, and likewise placing in lunar orbit and sending crew. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions participants had about Option A and Option B. These results were shared with NASA managers in December 2014 prior to their making a downselect decision about which option the agency should pursue for ARM. While the public did select Option B as their preferred way to perform the ARM mission (which aligned with what NASA later chose), the more important results from the deliberation included the illumination of citizen values and perceptions concerning ARM.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future
PublisherInternational Astronautical Federation, IAF
Pages10307-10319
Number of pages13
Volume13
ISBN (Electronic)9781510818934
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes
Event66th International Astronautical Congress 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future, IAC 2015 - Jerusalem, Israel
Duration: Oct 12 2015Oct 16 2015

Other

Other66th International Astronautical Congress 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future, IAC 2015
CountryIsrael
CityJerusalem
Period10/12/1510/16/15

Fingerprint

asteroid missions
technology assessment
Asteroids
asteroid
NASA
asteroids
lunar orbits
asteroid detection
science and technology
engineering
Mars exploration
Phoenix (AZ)
astronauts
crews
decision making
Orbits
illumination
citizen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cite this

Tomblin, D., Worthington, R., Gano, G., Farooque, M., Sittenfeld, D., Guston, D., ... Gates, M. (2015). Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission. In 66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future (Vol. 13, pp. 10307-10319). International Astronautical Federation, IAF.

Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission. / Tomblin, David; Worthington, Rick; Gano, Gretchen; Farooque, Mahmud; Sittenfeld, David; Guston, David; Lloyd, Jason; Pirtle, Zachary; Kessler, Jason; Mahoney, Erin; Kaminski, Amy; Gates, Michele.

66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future. Vol. 13 International Astronautical Federation, IAF, 2015. p. 10307-10319.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Tomblin, D, Worthington, R, Gano, G, Farooque, M, Sittenfeld, D, Guston, D, Lloyd, J, Pirtle, Z, Kessler, J, Mahoney, E, Kaminski, A & Gates, M 2015, Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission. in 66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future. vol. 13, International Astronautical Federation, IAF, pp. 10307-10319, 66th International Astronautical Congress 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future, IAC 2015, Jerusalem, Israel, 10/12/15.
Tomblin D, Worthington R, Gano G, Farooque M, Sittenfeld D, Guston D et al. Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission. In 66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future. Vol. 13. International Astronautical Federation, IAF. 2015. p. 10307-10319
Tomblin, David ; Worthington, Rick ; Gano, Gretchen ; Farooque, Mahmud ; Sittenfeld, David ; Guston, David ; Lloyd, Jason ; Pirtle, Zachary ; Kessler, Jason ; Mahoney, Erin ; Kaminski, Amy ; Gates, Michele. / Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission. 66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future. Vol. 13 International Astronautical Federation, IAF, 2015. pp. 10307-10319
@inproceedings{bdfc49286b8540d78d680a7dc014c74c,
title = "Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission",
abstract = "Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a method to gain public perspective about issues related to engineering and technology. pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform early engineering decisions. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA's Asteroid Initiative, which includes the Asteroid Grand Challenge and the Asteroid Redirect Mission. The goal of the forum was to assess citizens' values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA's Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect the demographics of each state. The full forums included sessions on asteroid detection, planetary defense, NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) deliberation. Citizens were given background information about two options for performing the ARM mission that, in 2014, NASA was actively assessing before making a downselect decision. Option A involved capturing a 10m diameter asteroid, redirecting it to lunar orbit, and sending astronauts to investigate and sample it. Option B involved capturing a several meter diameter boulder from the surface of a much larger asteroid, and likewise placing in lunar orbit and sending crew. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions participants had about Option A and Option B. These results were shared with NASA managers in December 2014 prior to their making a downselect decision about which option the agency should pursue for ARM. While the public did select Option B as their preferred way to perform the ARM mission (which aligned with what NASA later chose), the more important results from the deliberation included the illumination of citizen values and perceptions concerning ARM.",
author = "David Tomblin and Rick Worthington and Gretchen Gano and Mahmud Farooque and David Sittenfeld and David Guston and Jason Lloyd and Zachary Pirtle and Jason Kessler and Erin Mahoney and Amy Kaminski and Michele Gates",
year = "2015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "10307--10319",
booktitle = "66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future",
publisher = "International Astronautical Federation, IAF",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Participatory technology assessment of NASA's asteroid redirect mission

AU - Tomblin, David

AU - Worthington, Rick

AU - Gano, Gretchen

AU - Farooque, Mahmud

AU - Sittenfeld, David

AU - Guston, David

AU - Lloyd, Jason

AU - Pirtle, Zachary

AU - Kessler, Jason

AU - Mahoney, Erin

AU - Kaminski, Amy

AU - Gates, Michele

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a method to gain public perspective about issues related to engineering and technology. pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform early engineering decisions. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA's Asteroid Initiative, which includes the Asteroid Grand Challenge and the Asteroid Redirect Mission. The goal of the forum was to assess citizens' values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA's Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect the demographics of each state. The full forums included sessions on asteroid detection, planetary defense, NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) deliberation. Citizens were given background information about two options for performing the ARM mission that, in 2014, NASA was actively assessing before making a downselect decision. Option A involved capturing a 10m diameter asteroid, redirecting it to lunar orbit, and sending astronauts to investigate and sample it. Option B involved capturing a several meter diameter boulder from the surface of a much larger asteroid, and likewise placing in lunar orbit and sending crew. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions participants had about Option A and Option B. These results were shared with NASA managers in December 2014 prior to their making a downselect decision about which option the agency should pursue for ARM. While the public did select Option B as their preferred way to perform the ARM mission (which aligned with what NASA later chose), the more important results from the deliberation included the illumination of citizen values and perceptions concerning ARM.

AB - Participatory technology assessment (pTA) is a method to gain public perspective about issues related to engineering and technology. pTA can be particularly useful in informing technical decision-making. We will discuss an experiment in using pTA to inform early engineering decisions. In partnership with NASA, the Expert and Citizen Assessment of Science and Technology (ECAST) network conducted a pTA-based forum on NASA's Asteroid Initiative, which includes the Asteroid Grand Challenge and the Asteroid Redirect Mission. The goal of the forum was to assess citizens' values and their preferences about potential detection, mitigation, and exploration-based technologies associated with NASA's Asteroid Initiative. ECAST organized two citizen forums in Phoenix, Arizona, and Boston, Massachusetts, in November 2014, with a total of 183 citizens selected by ECAST to reflect the demographics of each state. The full forums included sessions on asteroid detection, planetary defense, NASA's Asteroid Redirect Mission, and Mars exploration. This paper focuses on the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM) deliberation. Citizens were given background information about two options for performing the ARM mission that, in 2014, NASA was actively assessing before making a downselect decision. Option A involved capturing a 10m diameter asteroid, redirecting it to lunar orbit, and sending astronauts to investigate and sample it. Option B involved capturing a several meter diameter boulder from the surface of a much larger asteroid, and likewise placing in lunar orbit and sending crew. In this paper, we will assess values and perceptions participants had about Option A and Option B. These results were shared with NASA managers in December 2014 prior to their making a downselect decision about which option the agency should pursue for ARM. While the public did select Option B as their preferred way to perform the ARM mission (which aligned with what NASA later chose), the more important results from the deliberation included the illumination of citizen values and perceptions concerning ARM.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991607879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991607879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 13

SP - 10307

EP - 10319

BT - 66th International Astronautical Congress 2015, IAC 2015: Space - The Gateway for Mankind's Future

PB - International Astronautical Federation, IAF

ER -