Parking Infrastructure

A Constraint on or Opportunity for Urban Redevelopment? A Study of Los Angeles County Parking Supply and Growth

Mikhail Chester, Andrew Fraser, Juan Matute, Carolyn Flower, Ram Pendyala

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Many cities have adopted minimum parking requirements, but there is relatively poor information about how parking infrastructure has grown. We estimate how parking has grown in Los Angeles County (CA) from 1900 to 2010 and how parking infrastructure evolves, affects urban form, and relates to changes in automobile travel using building and roadway growth models. We find that since 1975 the ratio of residential off-street parking spaces to automobiles in Los Angeles County is close to 1.0 and the greatest density of parking spaces is in the urban core, while most new growth in parking occurs outside of the core. In total, 14% of Los Angeles County's incorporated land is committed to parking. Uncertainty in our space inventory is attributed to our building growth model, on-street space length, and the assumption that parking spaces were created as per the requirements.Takeaway for practice: The continued use of minimum parking requirements is likely to encourage automobile use at a time when metropolitan areas are actively seeking to manage congestion and increase transit use, biking, and walking. Widely discussed ways to reform parking policies may be less than effective if planners do not consider the remaining incentives to auto use created by the existing parking infrastructure. Planners should encourage the conversion of existing parking facilities to alternative uses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-286
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of the American Planning Association
Volume81
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2 2015

Fingerprint

parking
redevelopment
motor vehicle
infrastructure
supply
agglomeration area
travel
incentive
uncertainty
reform
automobile
congestion
walking
metropolitan area

Keywords

  • infrastructure growth
  • Los Angeles
  • parking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Urban Studies
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Parking Infrastructure : A Constraint on or Opportunity for Urban Redevelopment? A Study of Los Angeles County Parking Supply and Growth. / Chester, Mikhail; Fraser, Andrew; Matute, Juan; Flower, Carolyn; Pendyala, Ram.

In: Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 81, No. 4, 02.10.2015, p. 268-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8d0bf2910f264872872fbc839edd496a,
title = "Parking Infrastructure: A Constraint on or Opportunity for Urban Redevelopment? A Study of Los Angeles County Parking Supply and Growth",
abstract = "Problem, research strategy, and findings: Many cities have adopted minimum parking requirements, but there is relatively poor information about how parking infrastructure has grown. We estimate how parking has grown in Los Angeles County (CA) from 1900 to 2010 and how parking infrastructure evolves, affects urban form, and relates to changes in automobile travel using building and roadway growth models. We find that since 1975 the ratio of residential off-street parking spaces to automobiles in Los Angeles County is close to 1.0 and the greatest density of parking spaces is in the urban core, while most new growth in parking occurs outside of the core. In total, 14{\%} of Los Angeles County's incorporated land is committed to parking. Uncertainty in our space inventory is attributed to our building growth model, on-street space length, and the assumption that parking spaces were created as per the requirements.Takeaway for practice: The continued use of minimum parking requirements is likely to encourage automobile use at a time when metropolitan areas are actively seeking to manage congestion and increase transit use, biking, and walking. Widely discussed ways to reform parking policies may be less than effective if planners do not consider the remaining incentives to auto use created by the existing parking infrastructure. Planners should encourage the conversion of existing parking facilities to alternative uses.",
keywords = "infrastructure growth, Los Angeles, parking",
author = "Mikhail Chester and Andrew Fraser and Juan Matute and Carolyn Flower and Ram Pendyala",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/01944363.2015.1092879",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "268--286",
journal = "Journal of the American Planning Association",
issn = "0194-4363",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parking Infrastructure

T2 - A Constraint on or Opportunity for Urban Redevelopment? A Study of Los Angeles County Parking Supply and Growth

AU - Chester, Mikhail

AU - Fraser, Andrew

AU - Matute, Juan

AU - Flower, Carolyn

AU - Pendyala, Ram

PY - 2015/10/2

Y1 - 2015/10/2

N2 - Problem, research strategy, and findings: Many cities have adopted minimum parking requirements, but there is relatively poor information about how parking infrastructure has grown. We estimate how parking has grown in Los Angeles County (CA) from 1900 to 2010 and how parking infrastructure evolves, affects urban form, and relates to changes in automobile travel using building and roadway growth models. We find that since 1975 the ratio of residential off-street parking spaces to automobiles in Los Angeles County is close to 1.0 and the greatest density of parking spaces is in the urban core, while most new growth in parking occurs outside of the core. In total, 14% of Los Angeles County's incorporated land is committed to parking. Uncertainty in our space inventory is attributed to our building growth model, on-street space length, and the assumption that parking spaces were created as per the requirements.Takeaway for practice: The continued use of minimum parking requirements is likely to encourage automobile use at a time when metropolitan areas are actively seeking to manage congestion and increase transit use, biking, and walking. Widely discussed ways to reform parking policies may be less than effective if planners do not consider the remaining incentives to auto use created by the existing parking infrastructure. Planners should encourage the conversion of existing parking facilities to alternative uses.

AB - Problem, research strategy, and findings: Many cities have adopted minimum parking requirements, but there is relatively poor information about how parking infrastructure has grown. We estimate how parking has grown in Los Angeles County (CA) from 1900 to 2010 and how parking infrastructure evolves, affects urban form, and relates to changes in automobile travel using building and roadway growth models. We find that since 1975 the ratio of residential off-street parking spaces to automobiles in Los Angeles County is close to 1.0 and the greatest density of parking spaces is in the urban core, while most new growth in parking occurs outside of the core. In total, 14% of Los Angeles County's incorporated land is committed to parking. Uncertainty in our space inventory is attributed to our building growth model, on-street space length, and the assumption that parking spaces were created as per the requirements.Takeaway for practice: The continued use of minimum parking requirements is likely to encourage automobile use at a time when metropolitan areas are actively seeking to manage congestion and increase transit use, biking, and walking. Widely discussed ways to reform parking policies may be less than effective if planners do not consider the remaining incentives to auto use created by the existing parking infrastructure. Planners should encourage the conversion of existing parking facilities to alternative uses.

KW - infrastructure growth

KW - Los Angeles

KW - parking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948985076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948985076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01944363.2015.1092879

DO - 10.1080/01944363.2015.1092879

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 268

EP - 286

JO - Journal of the American Planning Association

JF - Journal of the American Planning Association

SN - 0194-4363

IS - 4

ER -