Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance

Joseph Murray, Rolf Loeber, Dustin Pardini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Explanations for the fact that crime tends to run in families have focused on the deprived social backgrounds of criminal parents, methods of child-rearing, modeling processes, and genetic mechanisms. However, parental involvement in the criminal justice system itself also might contribute to the intergenerational transmission of crime and have other adverse effects on children's well-being. We investigated the development of youth problem behavior in relation to parental arrest, conviction, and incarceration in the youngest and oldest samples of the Pittsburgh Youth Study, a longitudinal survey of 1,009 inner-city boys. Parental arrest and conviction without incarceration did not predict the development of youth problem behavior. Parental incarceration was not associated with increases in marijuana use, depression, or poor academic performance. However, boys experiencing parental incarceration showed greater increases in theft compared with a control group matched on propensity scores. The association between parental incarceration and youth theft was stronger for White youth than for Black youth. Parenting and peer relations after parental incarceration explained about half of its effects on youth theft. Because the effects of parental incarceration were specific to youth theft, labeling and stigma processes might be particularly important for understanding the consequences of parental incarceration for children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-302
Number of pages48
JournalCriminology
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Theft
Criminal Law
larceny
Cannabis
justice
Depression
performance
Crime
Genetic Phenomena
offense
Child Rearing
Propensity Score
child well-being
social background
Parenting
Child Welfare
Longitudinal Studies
parents
Parents
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Academic performance
  • Delinquency
  • Depression
  • Intergenerational crime
  • Parental incarceration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance. / Murray, Joseph; Loeber, Rolf; Pardini, Dustin.

In: Criminology, Vol. 50, No. 1, 02.2012, p. 255-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{877d9dd01a694cf58a3071d250c8ce04,
title = "Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance",
abstract = "Explanations for the fact that crime tends to run in families have focused on the deprived social backgrounds of criminal parents, methods of child-rearing, modeling processes, and genetic mechanisms. However, parental involvement in the criminal justice system itself also might contribute to the intergenerational transmission of crime and have other adverse effects on children's well-being. We investigated the development of youth problem behavior in relation to parental arrest, conviction, and incarceration in the youngest and oldest samples of the Pittsburgh Youth Study, a longitudinal survey of 1,009 inner-city boys. Parental arrest and conviction without incarceration did not predict the development of youth problem behavior. Parental incarceration was not associated with increases in marijuana use, depression, or poor academic performance. However, boys experiencing parental incarceration showed greater increases in theft compared with a control group matched on propensity scores. The association between parental incarceration and youth theft was stronger for White youth than for Black youth. Parenting and peer relations after parental incarceration explained about half of its effects on youth theft. Because the effects of parental incarceration were specific to youth theft, labeling and stigma processes might be particularly important for understanding the consequences of parental incarceration for children.",
keywords = "Academic performance, Delinquency, Depression, Intergenerational crime, Parental incarceration",
author = "Joseph Murray and Rolf Loeber and Dustin Pardini",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00257.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "255--302",
journal = "Criminology",
issn = "0011-1384",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parental involvement in the criminal justice system and the development of youth theft, marijuana use, depression, and poor academic performance

AU - Murray, Joseph

AU - Loeber, Rolf

AU - Pardini, Dustin

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Explanations for the fact that crime tends to run in families have focused on the deprived social backgrounds of criminal parents, methods of child-rearing, modeling processes, and genetic mechanisms. However, parental involvement in the criminal justice system itself also might contribute to the intergenerational transmission of crime and have other adverse effects on children's well-being. We investigated the development of youth problem behavior in relation to parental arrest, conviction, and incarceration in the youngest and oldest samples of the Pittsburgh Youth Study, a longitudinal survey of 1,009 inner-city boys. Parental arrest and conviction without incarceration did not predict the development of youth problem behavior. Parental incarceration was not associated with increases in marijuana use, depression, or poor academic performance. However, boys experiencing parental incarceration showed greater increases in theft compared with a control group matched on propensity scores. The association between parental incarceration and youth theft was stronger for White youth than for Black youth. Parenting and peer relations after parental incarceration explained about half of its effects on youth theft. Because the effects of parental incarceration were specific to youth theft, labeling and stigma processes might be particularly important for understanding the consequences of parental incarceration for children.

AB - Explanations for the fact that crime tends to run in families have focused on the deprived social backgrounds of criminal parents, methods of child-rearing, modeling processes, and genetic mechanisms. However, parental involvement in the criminal justice system itself also might contribute to the intergenerational transmission of crime and have other adverse effects on children's well-being. We investigated the development of youth problem behavior in relation to parental arrest, conviction, and incarceration in the youngest and oldest samples of the Pittsburgh Youth Study, a longitudinal survey of 1,009 inner-city boys. Parental arrest and conviction without incarceration did not predict the development of youth problem behavior. Parental incarceration was not associated with increases in marijuana use, depression, or poor academic performance. However, boys experiencing parental incarceration showed greater increases in theft compared with a control group matched on propensity scores. The association between parental incarceration and youth theft was stronger for White youth than for Black youth. Parenting and peer relations after parental incarceration explained about half of its effects on youth theft. Because the effects of parental incarceration were specific to youth theft, labeling and stigma processes might be particularly important for understanding the consequences of parental incarceration for children.

KW - Academic performance

KW - Delinquency

KW - Depression

KW - Intergenerational crime

KW - Parental incarceration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856494630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856494630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00257.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00257.x

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 255

EP - 302

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 1

ER -