Paleodistribution modeling in archaeology and paleoanthropology

Janet Franklin, Alastair J. Potts, Erich C. Fisher, Richard M. Cowling, Curtis Marean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Species distribution modeling (SDM) is a methodology that has been widely used in the past two decades for developing quantitative, empirical, predictive models of species-environment relationships. SDM methods could be more broadly applied than they currently are to address research questions in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Specifically, SDM can be used to hindcast paleodistributions of species and ecological communities (paleo-SDM) for time periods and locations of prehistoric human occupation. Paleo-SDM may be a powerful tool for understanding human prehistory if used to hindcast the distributions of plants, animals and ecological communities that were key resources for prehistoric humans and to use this information to reconstruct the resource landscapes (paleoscapes) of prehistoric people. Components of the resource paleoscape include species (game animals, food plants), habitats, and geologic features and landforms associated with stone materials for tools, pigments, and so forth. We first review recent advances in SDM as it has been used to hindcast paleodistributions of plants and animals in the field of paleobiology. We then compare the paleo-SDM approach to paleoenvironmental reconstructions modeled from zooarchaeological and archaeobotanical records, widely used in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Next, we describe the less well developed but promising approach of using paleo-SDM methods to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. We argue that paleo-SDM offers an explicitly deductive strategy that generates spatial predictions grounded in strong theoretical understandings of the relation between species, habitat distributions and environment. Because of their limited sampling of space and time, archaeobiological records may be better suited for paleo-SDM validation than directly for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. We conclude by discussing the data requirements, limitations and potential for using predictive modeling to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. There is a need for improved paleoclimate models, improved paleoclimate proxy and species paleodistribution data for model validation, attention to scale issues, and rigorous modeling methods including mechanistic models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalQuaternary Science Reviews
Volume110
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 5 2015

Fingerprint

archaeology
biogeography
modeling
resources
animal
resource
habitat
paleoanthropology
Modeling
Paleoanthropology
Archaeology
reconstruction
paleoclimate
distribution
game animals
predictive model
prehistory
paleobiology
animal community
mechanistic models

Keywords

  • Paleoclimate
  • Paleodistributions
  • Paleoenvironmental reconstruction
  • Resource paleoscape
  • Species distribution modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Archaeology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Paleodistribution modeling in archaeology and paleoanthropology. / Franklin, Janet; Potts, Alastair J.; Fisher, Erich C.; Cowling, Richard M.; Marean, Curtis.

In: Quaternary Science Reviews, Vol. 110, 05.02.2015, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Franklin, Janet ; Potts, Alastair J. ; Fisher, Erich C. ; Cowling, Richard M. ; Marean, Curtis. / Paleodistribution modeling in archaeology and paleoanthropology. In: Quaternary Science Reviews. 2015 ; Vol. 110. pp. 1-14.
@article{90ecdb9d5d634e0f9d86a9a151af1170,
title = "Paleodistribution modeling in archaeology and paleoanthropology",
abstract = "Species distribution modeling (SDM) is a methodology that has been widely used in the past two decades for developing quantitative, empirical, predictive models of species-environment relationships. SDM methods could be more broadly applied than they currently are to address research questions in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Specifically, SDM can be used to hindcast paleodistributions of species and ecological communities (paleo-SDM) for time periods and locations of prehistoric human occupation. Paleo-SDM may be a powerful tool for understanding human prehistory if used to hindcast the distributions of plants, animals and ecological communities that were key resources for prehistoric humans and to use this information to reconstruct the resource landscapes (paleoscapes) of prehistoric people. Components of the resource paleoscape include species (game animals, food plants), habitats, and geologic features and landforms associated with stone materials for tools, pigments, and so forth. We first review recent advances in SDM as it has been used to hindcast paleodistributions of plants and animals in the field of paleobiology. We then compare the paleo-SDM approach to paleoenvironmental reconstructions modeled from zooarchaeological and archaeobotanical records, widely used in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Next, we describe the less well developed but promising approach of using paleo-SDM methods to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. We argue that paleo-SDM offers an explicitly deductive strategy that generates spatial predictions grounded in strong theoretical understandings of the relation between species, habitat distributions and environment. Because of their limited sampling of space and time, archaeobiological records may be better suited for paleo-SDM validation than directly for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. We conclude by discussing the data requirements, limitations and potential for using predictive modeling to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. There is a need for improved paleoclimate models, improved paleoclimate proxy and species paleodistribution data for model validation, attention to scale issues, and rigorous modeling methods including mechanistic models.",
keywords = "Paleoclimate, Paleodistributions, Paleoenvironmental reconstruction, Resource paleoscape, Species distribution modeling",
author = "Janet Franklin and Potts, {Alastair J.} and Fisher, {Erich C.} and Cowling, {Richard M.} and Curtis Marean",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.12.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Quaternary Science Reviews",
issn = "0277-3791",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paleodistribution modeling in archaeology and paleoanthropology

AU - Franklin, Janet

AU - Potts, Alastair J.

AU - Fisher, Erich C.

AU - Cowling, Richard M.

AU - Marean, Curtis

PY - 2015/2/5

Y1 - 2015/2/5

N2 - Species distribution modeling (SDM) is a methodology that has been widely used in the past two decades for developing quantitative, empirical, predictive models of species-environment relationships. SDM methods could be more broadly applied than they currently are to address research questions in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Specifically, SDM can be used to hindcast paleodistributions of species and ecological communities (paleo-SDM) for time periods and locations of prehistoric human occupation. Paleo-SDM may be a powerful tool for understanding human prehistory if used to hindcast the distributions of plants, animals and ecological communities that were key resources for prehistoric humans and to use this information to reconstruct the resource landscapes (paleoscapes) of prehistoric people. Components of the resource paleoscape include species (game animals, food plants), habitats, and geologic features and landforms associated with stone materials for tools, pigments, and so forth. We first review recent advances in SDM as it has been used to hindcast paleodistributions of plants and animals in the field of paleobiology. We then compare the paleo-SDM approach to paleoenvironmental reconstructions modeled from zooarchaeological and archaeobotanical records, widely used in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Next, we describe the less well developed but promising approach of using paleo-SDM methods to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. We argue that paleo-SDM offers an explicitly deductive strategy that generates spatial predictions grounded in strong theoretical understandings of the relation between species, habitat distributions and environment. Because of their limited sampling of space and time, archaeobiological records may be better suited for paleo-SDM validation than directly for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. We conclude by discussing the data requirements, limitations and potential for using predictive modeling to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. There is a need for improved paleoclimate models, improved paleoclimate proxy and species paleodistribution data for model validation, attention to scale issues, and rigorous modeling methods including mechanistic models.

AB - Species distribution modeling (SDM) is a methodology that has been widely used in the past two decades for developing quantitative, empirical, predictive models of species-environment relationships. SDM methods could be more broadly applied than they currently are to address research questions in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Specifically, SDM can be used to hindcast paleodistributions of species and ecological communities (paleo-SDM) for time periods and locations of prehistoric human occupation. Paleo-SDM may be a powerful tool for understanding human prehistory if used to hindcast the distributions of plants, animals and ecological communities that were key resources for prehistoric humans and to use this information to reconstruct the resource landscapes (paleoscapes) of prehistoric people. Components of the resource paleoscape include species (game animals, food plants), habitats, and geologic features and landforms associated with stone materials for tools, pigments, and so forth. We first review recent advances in SDM as it has been used to hindcast paleodistributions of plants and animals in the field of paleobiology. We then compare the paleo-SDM approach to paleoenvironmental reconstructions modeled from zooarchaeological and archaeobotanical records, widely used in archaeology and paleoanthropology. Next, we describe the less well developed but promising approach of using paleo-SDM methods to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. We argue that paleo-SDM offers an explicitly deductive strategy that generates spatial predictions grounded in strong theoretical understandings of the relation between species, habitat distributions and environment. Because of their limited sampling of space and time, archaeobiological records may be better suited for paleo-SDM validation than directly for paleoenvironmental reconstruction. We conclude by discussing the data requirements, limitations and potential for using predictive modeling to reconstruct resource paleoscapes. There is a need for improved paleoclimate models, improved paleoclimate proxy and species paleodistribution data for model validation, attention to scale issues, and rigorous modeling methods including mechanistic models.

KW - Paleoclimate

KW - Paleodistributions

KW - Paleoenvironmental reconstruction

KW - Resource paleoscape

KW - Species distribution modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920998061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920998061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.12.015

DO - 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.12.015

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Quaternary Science Reviews

JF - Quaternary Science Reviews

SN - 0277-3791

ER -