Paleodemography: critiques and controversies.

Jane Buikstra, L. W. Konigsberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

103 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent criticism of paleodemographic methods (Bocquet-Appel and Masset 1982) has centered on biases introduced by the nature of reference samples and the population-specificity of techniques for estimating age in skeletal remains. This paper examines five key arguments concerning this bias and alleged imprecision from the perspective of life table analysis. Results of the simulation and statistical analyses indicate that the criticism leveled by Bocquet-Appel and Masset is extreme. Imprecision in age indicators applied to older adults remains a problem, however, as does inter-observer error.-Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)316-333
Number of pages18
JournalAmerican Anthropologist
Volume87
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

criticism
trend
simulation
Criticism
Imprecision
Paleodemography
Simulation
Skeletal Remains
Observer
Life Table
Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology

Cite this

Paleodemography : critiques and controversies. / Buikstra, Jane; Konigsberg, L. W.

In: American Anthropologist, Vol. 87, No. 2, 1985, p. 316-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buikstra, J & Konigsberg, LW 1985, 'Paleodemography: critiques and controversies.', American Anthropologist, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 316-333.
Buikstra, Jane ; Konigsberg, L. W. / Paleodemography : critiques and controversies. In: American Anthropologist. 1985 ; Vol. 87, No. 2. pp. 316-333.
@article{353349fae0d248b2be0cb9b80c791e72,
title = "Paleodemography: critiques and controversies.",
abstract = "Recent criticism of paleodemographic methods (Bocquet-Appel and Masset 1982) has centered on biases introduced by the nature of reference samples and the population-specificity of techniques for estimating age in skeletal remains. This paper examines five key arguments concerning this bias and alleged imprecision from the perspective of life table analysis. Results of the simulation and statistical analyses indicate that the criticism leveled by Bocquet-Appel and Masset is extreme. Imprecision in age indicators applied to older adults remains a problem, however, as does inter-observer error.-Authors",
author = "Jane Buikstra and Konigsberg, {L. W.}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "316--333",
journal = "American Anthropologist",
issn = "1548-1433",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paleodemography

T2 - critiques and controversies.

AU - Buikstra, Jane

AU - Konigsberg, L. W.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Recent criticism of paleodemographic methods (Bocquet-Appel and Masset 1982) has centered on biases introduced by the nature of reference samples and the population-specificity of techniques for estimating age in skeletal remains. This paper examines five key arguments concerning this bias and alleged imprecision from the perspective of life table analysis. Results of the simulation and statistical analyses indicate that the criticism leveled by Bocquet-Appel and Masset is extreme. Imprecision in age indicators applied to older adults remains a problem, however, as does inter-observer error.-Authors

AB - Recent criticism of paleodemographic methods (Bocquet-Appel and Masset 1982) has centered on biases introduced by the nature of reference samples and the population-specificity of techniques for estimating age in skeletal remains. This paper examines five key arguments concerning this bias and alleged imprecision from the perspective of life table analysis. Results of the simulation and statistical analyses indicate that the criticism leveled by Bocquet-Appel and Masset is extreme. Imprecision in age indicators applied to older adults remains a problem, however, as does inter-observer error.-Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022214674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022214674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0022214674

VL - 87

SP - 316

EP - 333

JO - American Anthropologist

JF - American Anthropologist

SN - 1548-1433

IS - 2

ER -