Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness

Michael Baer, Jessica B. Rodell, Rashpal K. Dhensa-Kahlon, Jason A. Colquitt, Kate P. Zipay, Rachel Burgess, Ryan Outlaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many employees feel a general sense of unfairness toward their supervisors. A common reaction to such unfairness is to talk about it with coworkers. The conventional wisdom is that this unfairness talk should be beneficial to the aggrieved employees. After all, talking provides employees with an opportunity to make sense of the experience and to “let off steam.” We challenge this perspective, drawing on cognitive-motivational-relational theory to develop arguments that unfairness talk leads to emotions that reduce the employee’s ability to move on from the unfairness. We first tested these proposals in a three-wave, two-source field study of bus drivers (Study 1), then replicated our findings in a laboratory study (Study 2). In both studies, we found that unfairness talk was positively related to anger and negatively related to hope. Those emotions went on to have direct effects on forgiveness and indirect effects on citizenship behavior. Our results also show that the detrimental effects of unfairness talk were neutralized when the listener offered suggestions that reframed the unfair situation. We discuss the implications of these results for managing unfairness in organizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1764-1788
Number of pages25
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume61
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Supervisory personnel
Personnel
Bus drivers
Steam
Employees
Supervisors
Emotion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Baer, M., Rodell, J. B., Dhensa-Kahlon, R. K., Colquitt, J. A., Zipay, K. P., Burgess, R., & Outlaw, R. (2018). Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1764-1788. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0630

Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness. / Baer, Michael; Rodell, Jessica B.; Dhensa-Kahlon, Rashpal K.; Colquitt, Jason A.; Zipay, Kate P.; Burgess, Rachel; Outlaw, Ryan.

In: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 61, No. 5, 01.10.2018, p. 1764-1788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Baer, M, Rodell, JB, Dhensa-Kahlon, RK, Colquitt, JA, Zipay, KP, Burgess, R & Outlaw, R 2018, 'Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness', Academy of Management Journal, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1764-1788. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0630
Baer M, Rodell JB, Dhensa-Kahlon RK, Colquitt JA, Zipay KP, Burgess R et al. Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness. Academy of Management Journal. 2018 Oct 1;61(5):1764-1788. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0630
Baer, Michael ; Rodell, Jessica B. ; Dhensa-Kahlon, Rashpal K. ; Colquitt, Jason A. ; Zipay, Kate P. ; Burgess, Rachel ; Outlaw, Ryan. / Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness. In: Academy of Management Journal. 2018 ; Vol. 61, No. 5. pp. 1764-1788.
@article{b1053111fcf64633877f909a4728c325,
title = "Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness",
abstract = "Many employees feel a general sense of unfairness toward their supervisors. A common reaction to such unfairness is to talk about it with coworkers. The conventional wisdom is that this unfairness talk should be beneficial to the aggrieved employees. After all, talking provides employees with an opportunity to make sense of the experience and to “let off steam.” We challenge this perspective, drawing on cognitive-motivational-relational theory to develop arguments that unfairness talk leads to emotions that reduce the employee’s ability to move on from the unfairness. We first tested these proposals in a three-wave, two-source field study of bus drivers (Study 1), then replicated our findings in a laboratory study (Study 2). In both studies, we found that unfairness talk was positively related to anger and negatively related to hope. Those emotions went on to have direct effects on forgiveness and indirect effects on citizenship behavior. Our results also show that the detrimental effects of unfairness talk were neutralized when the listener offered suggestions that reframed the unfair situation. We discuss the implications of these results for managing unfairness in organizations.",
author = "Michael Baer and Rodell, {Jessica B.} and Dhensa-Kahlon, {Rashpal K.} and Colquitt, {Jason A.} and Zipay, {Kate P.} and Rachel Burgess and Ryan Outlaw",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amj.2016.0630",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1764--1788",
journal = "Academy of Management Journal",
issn = "0001-4273",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pacification or aggravation? The effects of talking about supervisor unfairness

AU - Baer, Michael

AU - Rodell, Jessica B.

AU - Dhensa-Kahlon, Rashpal K.

AU - Colquitt, Jason A.

AU - Zipay, Kate P.

AU - Burgess, Rachel

AU - Outlaw, Ryan

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Many employees feel a general sense of unfairness toward their supervisors. A common reaction to such unfairness is to talk about it with coworkers. The conventional wisdom is that this unfairness talk should be beneficial to the aggrieved employees. After all, talking provides employees with an opportunity to make sense of the experience and to “let off steam.” We challenge this perspective, drawing on cognitive-motivational-relational theory to develop arguments that unfairness talk leads to emotions that reduce the employee’s ability to move on from the unfairness. We first tested these proposals in a three-wave, two-source field study of bus drivers (Study 1), then replicated our findings in a laboratory study (Study 2). In both studies, we found that unfairness talk was positively related to anger and negatively related to hope. Those emotions went on to have direct effects on forgiveness and indirect effects on citizenship behavior. Our results also show that the detrimental effects of unfairness talk were neutralized when the listener offered suggestions that reframed the unfair situation. We discuss the implications of these results for managing unfairness in organizations.

AB - Many employees feel a general sense of unfairness toward their supervisors. A common reaction to such unfairness is to talk about it with coworkers. The conventional wisdom is that this unfairness talk should be beneficial to the aggrieved employees. After all, talking provides employees with an opportunity to make sense of the experience and to “let off steam.” We challenge this perspective, drawing on cognitive-motivational-relational theory to develop arguments that unfairness talk leads to emotions that reduce the employee’s ability to move on from the unfairness. We first tested these proposals in a three-wave, two-source field study of bus drivers (Study 1), then replicated our findings in a laboratory study (Study 2). In both studies, we found that unfairness talk was positively related to anger and negatively related to hope. Those emotions went on to have direct effects on forgiveness and indirect effects on citizenship behavior. Our results also show that the detrimental effects of unfairness talk were neutralized when the listener offered suggestions that reframed the unfair situation. We discuss the implications of these results for managing unfairness in organizations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055856171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055856171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amj.2016.0630

DO - 10.5465/amj.2016.0630

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85055856171

VL - 61

SP - 1764

EP - 1788

JO - Academy of Management Journal

JF - Academy of Management Journal

SN - 0001-4273

IS - 5

ER -