Ownership structure and corporate strategy: One question viewed from two different worlds

Peter J. Lane, Albert A. Cannella, Michael H. Lubatkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In their response to our paper, Amihud and Lev (1999) and Denis, Denis, and Sarin (1999) claim that disciplinary differences don't matter and that methods and evidence should speak for themselves. In contrast, we argue that important differences exist between financial economics and strategic management, leading to differing beliefs, norms, methods, and interpretations of empirical results. Using a strategic management perspective to review the evidence presented by Amihud and Lev in their earlier study (1981) and in their and Denis et al.'s critiques of our work (1999), we find no reason to revise our original conclusion: there is little theoretical or empirical basis for believing that monitoring by a firm's principals influences its diversification strategy and acquisition decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1077-1086
Number of pages10
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Volume20
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economics
Monitoring
Corporate strategy
Ownership structure
Strategic management
Diversification strategy
Financial economics
Empirical results

Keywords

  • Agency theory
  • Diversification
  • Management theory
  • Mergers
  • Scientific disciplines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Lane, P. J., Cannella, A. A., & Lubatkin, M. H. (1999). Ownership structure and corporate strategy: One question viewed from two different worlds. Strategic Management Journal, 20(11), 1077-1086.

Ownership structure and corporate strategy : One question viewed from two different worlds. / Lane, Peter J.; Cannella, Albert A.; Lubatkin, Michael H.

In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 11, 11.1999, p. 1077-1086.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lane, PJ, Cannella, AA & Lubatkin, MH 1999, 'Ownership structure and corporate strategy: One question viewed from two different worlds', Strategic Management Journal, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1077-1086.
Lane, Peter J. ; Cannella, Albert A. ; Lubatkin, Michael H. / Ownership structure and corporate strategy : One question viewed from two different worlds. In: Strategic Management Journal. 1999 ; Vol. 20, No. 11. pp. 1077-1086.
@article{f4b260a50c334a9f88ea7bbf86342dc4,
title = "Ownership structure and corporate strategy: One question viewed from two different worlds",
abstract = "In their response to our paper, Amihud and Lev (1999) and Denis, Denis, and Sarin (1999) claim that disciplinary differences don't matter and that methods and evidence should speak for themselves. In contrast, we argue that important differences exist between financial economics and strategic management, leading to differing beliefs, norms, methods, and interpretations of empirical results. Using a strategic management perspective to review the evidence presented by Amihud and Lev in their earlier study (1981) and in their and Denis et al.'s critiques of our work (1999), we find no reason to revise our original conclusion: there is little theoretical or empirical basis for believing that monitoring by a firm's principals influences its diversification strategy and acquisition decisions.",
keywords = "Agency theory, Diversification, Management theory, Mergers, Scientific disciplines",
author = "Lane, {Peter J.} and Cannella, {Albert A.} and Lubatkin, {Michael H.}",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1077--1086",
journal = "Strategic Management Journal",
issn = "0143-2095",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ownership structure and corporate strategy

T2 - One question viewed from two different worlds

AU - Lane, Peter J.

AU - Cannella, Albert A.

AU - Lubatkin, Michael H.

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - In their response to our paper, Amihud and Lev (1999) and Denis, Denis, and Sarin (1999) claim that disciplinary differences don't matter and that methods and evidence should speak for themselves. In contrast, we argue that important differences exist between financial economics and strategic management, leading to differing beliefs, norms, methods, and interpretations of empirical results. Using a strategic management perspective to review the evidence presented by Amihud and Lev in their earlier study (1981) and in their and Denis et al.'s critiques of our work (1999), we find no reason to revise our original conclusion: there is little theoretical or empirical basis for believing that monitoring by a firm's principals influences its diversification strategy and acquisition decisions.

AB - In their response to our paper, Amihud and Lev (1999) and Denis, Denis, and Sarin (1999) claim that disciplinary differences don't matter and that methods and evidence should speak for themselves. In contrast, we argue that important differences exist between financial economics and strategic management, leading to differing beliefs, norms, methods, and interpretations of empirical results. Using a strategic management perspective to review the evidence presented by Amihud and Lev in their earlier study (1981) and in their and Denis et al.'s critiques of our work (1999), we find no reason to revise our original conclusion: there is little theoretical or empirical basis for believing that monitoring by a firm's principals influences its diversification strategy and acquisition decisions.

KW - Agency theory

KW - Diversification

KW - Management theory

KW - Mergers

KW - Scientific disciplines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0008782221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0008782221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0008782221

VL - 20

SP - 1077

EP - 1086

JO - Strategic Management Journal

JF - Strategic Management Journal

SN - 0143-2095

IS - 11

ER -