Outline of an explanatory account of cladistic practice

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A naturalistic account of the strengths and limitations of cladistic practice is offered. The success of cladistics is claimed to be largely rooted in the parsimony-implementing congruence test. Cladists may use the congruence test to iteratively refine assessments of homology, and thereby increase the odds of reliable phylogenetic inference under parsimony. This explanation challenges alternative views which tend to ignore the effects of parsimony on the process of character individuation in systematics. In a related theme, the concept of homeostatic property cluster natural kinds is used to explain why cladistics is well suited to provide a traditional, verbal reference system for the evolutionary properties of species and clades. The advantages of more explicitly probabilistic approaches to phylogenetic inference appear to manifest themselves in situations where evolutionary homeostasis has for the most part broken down, and predictive classifications are no longer possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-515
Number of pages27
JournalBiology and Philosophy
Volume20
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Individuation
phylogeny
Homeostasis
homeostasis
testing
Cladistics
Parsimony
taxonomy
Congruence
Evolutionary
Inference
Phylogenetics
Homology
Reference Systems
Natural Kinds

Keywords

  • Classification
  • Congruence test
  • Evolutionary homeostasis
  • Homology
  • Natural kinds
  • Parsimony
  • Phylogeny
  • Projectibility
  • Reference
  • Taxonomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

Outline of an explanatory account of cladistic practice. / Franz, Nico.

In: Biology and Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 2-3, 03.2005, p. 489-515.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8d1eae0aab67497bbd22830981b013ae,
title = "Outline of an explanatory account of cladistic practice",
abstract = "A naturalistic account of the strengths and limitations of cladistic practice is offered. The success of cladistics is claimed to be largely rooted in the parsimony-implementing congruence test. Cladists may use the congruence test to iteratively refine assessments of homology, and thereby increase the odds of reliable phylogenetic inference under parsimony. This explanation challenges alternative views which tend to ignore the effects of parsimony on the process of character individuation in systematics. In a related theme, the concept of homeostatic property cluster natural kinds is used to explain why cladistics is well suited to provide a traditional, verbal reference system for the evolutionary properties of species and clades. The advantages of more explicitly probabilistic approaches to phylogenetic inference appear to manifest themselves in situations where evolutionary homeostasis has for the most part broken down, and predictive classifications are no longer possible.",
keywords = "Classification, Congruence test, Evolutionary homeostasis, Homology, Natural kinds, Parsimony, Phylogeny, Projectibility, Reference, Taxonomy",
author = "Nico Franz",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10539-004-0757-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "489--515",
journal = "Biology and Philosophy",
issn = "0169-3867",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outline of an explanatory account of cladistic practice

AU - Franz, Nico

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - A naturalistic account of the strengths and limitations of cladistic practice is offered. The success of cladistics is claimed to be largely rooted in the parsimony-implementing congruence test. Cladists may use the congruence test to iteratively refine assessments of homology, and thereby increase the odds of reliable phylogenetic inference under parsimony. This explanation challenges alternative views which tend to ignore the effects of parsimony on the process of character individuation in systematics. In a related theme, the concept of homeostatic property cluster natural kinds is used to explain why cladistics is well suited to provide a traditional, verbal reference system for the evolutionary properties of species and clades. The advantages of more explicitly probabilistic approaches to phylogenetic inference appear to manifest themselves in situations where evolutionary homeostasis has for the most part broken down, and predictive classifications are no longer possible.

AB - A naturalistic account of the strengths and limitations of cladistic practice is offered. The success of cladistics is claimed to be largely rooted in the parsimony-implementing congruence test. Cladists may use the congruence test to iteratively refine assessments of homology, and thereby increase the odds of reliable phylogenetic inference under parsimony. This explanation challenges alternative views which tend to ignore the effects of parsimony on the process of character individuation in systematics. In a related theme, the concept of homeostatic property cluster natural kinds is used to explain why cladistics is well suited to provide a traditional, verbal reference system for the evolutionary properties of species and clades. The advantages of more explicitly probabilistic approaches to phylogenetic inference appear to manifest themselves in situations where evolutionary homeostasis has for the most part broken down, and predictive classifications are no longer possible.

KW - Classification

KW - Congruence test

KW - Evolutionary homeostasis

KW - Homology

KW - Natural kinds

KW - Parsimony

KW - Phylogeny

KW - Projectibility

KW - Reference

KW - Taxonomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745176781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745176781&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10539-004-0757-2

DO - 10.1007/s10539-004-0757-2

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 489

EP - 515

JO - Biology and Philosophy

JF - Biology and Philosophy

SN - 0169-3867

IS - 2-3

ER -