Origins of the human predatory pattern

The transition to large-animal exploitation by early hominins

Jessica C. Thompson, Susana Carvalho, Curtis Marean, Zeresenay Alemseged

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The habitual consumption of large-animal resources (e.g., similar sized or larger than the consumer) separates human and nonhuman primate behavior. Flaked stone tool use, another important hominin behavior, is often portrayed as being functionally related to this by the necessity of a sharp edge for cutting animal tissue. However, most research on both issues emphasizes sites that postdate ca. 2.0 million years ago. This paper critically examines the theoretical significance of the earlier origins of these two behaviors, their proposed interrelationship, and the nature of the empirical record. We argue that concepts of meat-eating and tool use are too loosely defined: outside-bone nutrients (e.g., meat) and inside-bone nutrients (e.g., marrow and brains) have different macronutrient characteristics (protein vs. fat), mechanical requirements for access (cutting vs. percussion), search, handling and competitive costs, encounter rates, and net returns. Thus, they would have demanded distinct technological and behavioral solutions. We propose that the regular exploitation of large-animal resources—the “human predatory pattern”—began with an emphasis on percussion-based scavenging of inside-bone nutrients, independent of the emergence of flaked stone tool use. This leads to a series of empirical test implications that differ from previous “meat-eating” origins scenarios.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalCurrent anthropology
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

exploitation
animal
eating behavior
brain
scenario
costs
resources
Animals
Exploitation
Tool Use
Stone Tools
Meat-eating
Percussion
Nonhuman Primate
Interrelationship
Marrow
Protein
Habitual
Costs
Regular

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Origins of the human predatory pattern : The transition to large-animal exploitation by early hominins. / Thompson, Jessica C.; Carvalho, Susana; Marean, Curtis; Alemseged, Zeresenay.

In: Current anthropology, Vol. 60, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thompson, Jessica C. ; Carvalho, Susana ; Marean, Curtis ; Alemseged, Zeresenay. / Origins of the human predatory pattern : The transition to large-animal exploitation by early hominins. In: Current anthropology. 2019 ; Vol. 60, No. 1. pp. 1-23.
@article{21894f1e771c48418f2fbde391c21745,
title = "Origins of the human predatory pattern: The transition to large-animal exploitation by early hominins",
abstract = "The habitual consumption of large-animal resources (e.g., similar sized or larger than the consumer) separates human and nonhuman primate behavior. Flaked stone tool use, another important hominin behavior, is often portrayed as being functionally related to this by the necessity of a sharp edge for cutting animal tissue. However, most research on both issues emphasizes sites that postdate ca. 2.0 million years ago. This paper critically examines the theoretical significance of the earlier origins of these two behaviors, their proposed interrelationship, and the nature of the empirical record. We argue that concepts of meat-eating and tool use are too loosely defined: outside-bone nutrients (e.g., meat) and inside-bone nutrients (e.g., marrow and brains) have different macronutrient characteristics (protein vs. fat), mechanical requirements for access (cutting vs. percussion), search, handling and competitive costs, encounter rates, and net returns. Thus, they would have demanded distinct technological and behavioral solutions. We propose that the regular exploitation of large-animal resources—the “human predatory pattern”—began with an emphasis on percussion-based scavenging of inside-bone nutrients, independent of the emergence of flaked stone tool use. This leads to a series of empirical test implications that differ from previous “meat-eating” origins scenarios.",
author = "Thompson, {Jessica C.} and Susana Carvalho and Curtis Marean and Zeresenay Alemseged",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/701477",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Current Anthropology",
issn = "0011-3204",
publisher = "University of Chicago",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Origins of the human predatory pattern

T2 - The transition to large-animal exploitation by early hominins

AU - Thompson, Jessica C.

AU - Carvalho, Susana

AU - Marean, Curtis

AU - Alemseged, Zeresenay

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - The habitual consumption of large-animal resources (e.g., similar sized or larger than the consumer) separates human and nonhuman primate behavior. Flaked stone tool use, another important hominin behavior, is often portrayed as being functionally related to this by the necessity of a sharp edge for cutting animal tissue. However, most research on both issues emphasizes sites that postdate ca. 2.0 million years ago. This paper critically examines the theoretical significance of the earlier origins of these two behaviors, their proposed interrelationship, and the nature of the empirical record. We argue that concepts of meat-eating and tool use are too loosely defined: outside-bone nutrients (e.g., meat) and inside-bone nutrients (e.g., marrow and brains) have different macronutrient characteristics (protein vs. fat), mechanical requirements for access (cutting vs. percussion), search, handling and competitive costs, encounter rates, and net returns. Thus, they would have demanded distinct technological and behavioral solutions. We propose that the regular exploitation of large-animal resources—the “human predatory pattern”—began with an emphasis on percussion-based scavenging of inside-bone nutrients, independent of the emergence of flaked stone tool use. This leads to a series of empirical test implications that differ from previous “meat-eating” origins scenarios.

AB - The habitual consumption of large-animal resources (e.g., similar sized or larger than the consumer) separates human and nonhuman primate behavior. Flaked stone tool use, another important hominin behavior, is often portrayed as being functionally related to this by the necessity of a sharp edge for cutting animal tissue. However, most research on both issues emphasizes sites that postdate ca. 2.0 million years ago. This paper critically examines the theoretical significance of the earlier origins of these two behaviors, their proposed interrelationship, and the nature of the empirical record. We argue that concepts of meat-eating and tool use are too loosely defined: outside-bone nutrients (e.g., meat) and inside-bone nutrients (e.g., marrow and brains) have different macronutrient characteristics (protein vs. fat), mechanical requirements for access (cutting vs. percussion), search, handling and competitive costs, encounter rates, and net returns. Thus, they would have demanded distinct technological and behavioral solutions. We propose that the regular exploitation of large-animal resources—the “human predatory pattern”—began with an emphasis on percussion-based scavenging of inside-bone nutrients, independent of the emergence of flaked stone tool use. This leads to a series of empirical test implications that differ from previous “meat-eating” origins scenarios.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061660402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061660402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/701477

DO - 10.1086/701477

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Current Anthropology

JF - Current Anthropology

SN - 0011-3204

IS - 1

ER -