Organizational Identity Formation and Change

Dennis A. Gioia, Shubha D. Patvardhan, Aimee L. Hamilton, Kevin Corley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Theory and research concerning organizational identity ("who we are as an organization") is a burgeoning domain within organization study. A great deal of conceptual and empirical work has been accomplished within the last three decades-especially concerning the phenomenon of organizational identity change. More recently, work has been devoted to studying the processes and content associated with identity formation. Given the amount of scholarly work done to date, it is an appropriate time to reflect on the perspectives, controversies and outcomes of this body of work. Because organizational identity change has received the preponderance of attention, we first review that extensive literature. We consider the conceptual and empirical work concerning the three putative "pillars" of identity (i.e. that which is ostensibly central, enduring, and distinctive). We devote particular attention to the most controversial of these pillars-the debate pitting a view that sees identity as stable over time (a position we term as the "enduring identity proposition") and a contrasting stance that sees identity as more changeable (the "dynamic identity proposition"). Following our review of the identity change literature, we next take up a review of the notably smaller compendium of work on identity formation. We consider the conceptual and empirical work devoted to studying the external influences on, as well as the internal resources used, to fashion a nascent identity. Finally, we discuss in more depth the controversies associated with the pillars of identity, assess the four prevalent views on organizational identity (the social construction, social actor, institutionalist, and population ecologist views), assimilate the research on both identity formation and change, and consider the prospects for future work on both phenomena.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademy of Management Annals
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2013

Fingerprint

Organizational identity
Social construction
Resources
Organization studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Business and International Management

Cite this

Organizational Identity Formation and Change. / Gioia, Dennis A.; Patvardhan, Shubha D.; Hamilton, Aimee L.; Corley, Kevin.

In: Academy of Management Annals, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gioia, Dennis A. ; Patvardhan, Shubha D. ; Hamilton, Aimee L. ; Corley, Kevin. / Organizational Identity Formation and Change. In: Academy of Management Annals. 2013.
@article{5bdc3235093e423e9055afbf81df0c70,
title = "Organizational Identity Formation and Change",
abstract = "Theory and research concerning organizational identity ({"}who we are as an organization{"}) is a burgeoning domain within organization study. A great deal of conceptual and empirical work has been accomplished within the last three decades-especially concerning the phenomenon of organizational identity change. More recently, work has been devoted to studying the processes and content associated with identity formation. Given the amount of scholarly work done to date, it is an appropriate time to reflect on the perspectives, controversies and outcomes of this body of work. Because organizational identity change has received the preponderance of attention, we first review that extensive literature. We consider the conceptual and empirical work concerning the three putative {"}pillars{"} of identity (i.e. that which is ostensibly central, enduring, and distinctive). We devote particular attention to the most controversial of these pillars-the debate pitting a view that sees identity as stable over time (a position we term as the {"}enduring identity proposition{"}) and a contrasting stance that sees identity as more changeable (the {"}dynamic identity proposition{"}). Following our review of the identity change literature, we next take up a review of the notably smaller compendium of work on identity formation. We consider the conceptual and empirical work devoted to studying the external influences on, as well as the internal resources used, to fashion a nascent identity. Finally, we discuss in more depth the controversies associated with the pillars of identity, assess the four prevalent views on organizational identity (the social construction, social actor, institutionalist, and population ecologist views), assimilate the research on both identity formation and change, and consider the prospects for future work on both phenomena.",
author = "Gioia, {Dennis A.} and Patvardhan, {Shubha D.} and Hamilton, {Aimee L.} and Kevin Corley",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/19416520.2013.762225",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academy of Management Annals",
issn = "1941-6520",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational Identity Formation and Change

AU - Gioia, Dennis A.

AU - Patvardhan, Shubha D.

AU - Hamilton, Aimee L.

AU - Corley, Kevin

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Theory and research concerning organizational identity ("who we are as an organization") is a burgeoning domain within organization study. A great deal of conceptual and empirical work has been accomplished within the last three decades-especially concerning the phenomenon of organizational identity change. More recently, work has been devoted to studying the processes and content associated with identity formation. Given the amount of scholarly work done to date, it is an appropriate time to reflect on the perspectives, controversies and outcomes of this body of work. Because organizational identity change has received the preponderance of attention, we first review that extensive literature. We consider the conceptual and empirical work concerning the three putative "pillars" of identity (i.e. that which is ostensibly central, enduring, and distinctive). We devote particular attention to the most controversial of these pillars-the debate pitting a view that sees identity as stable over time (a position we term as the "enduring identity proposition") and a contrasting stance that sees identity as more changeable (the "dynamic identity proposition"). Following our review of the identity change literature, we next take up a review of the notably smaller compendium of work on identity formation. We consider the conceptual and empirical work devoted to studying the external influences on, as well as the internal resources used, to fashion a nascent identity. Finally, we discuss in more depth the controversies associated with the pillars of identity, assess the four prevalent views on organizational identity (the social construction, social actor, institutionalist, and population ecologist views), assimilate the research on both identity formation and change, and consider the prospects for future work on both phenomena.

AB - Theory and research concerning organizational identity ("who we are as an organization") is a burgeoning domain within organization study. A great deal of conceptual and empirical work has been accomplished within the last three decades-especially concerning the phenomenon of organizational identity change. More recently, work has been devoted to studying the processes and content associated with identity formation. Given the amount of scholarly work done to date, it is an appropriate time to reflect on the perspectives, controversies and outcomes of this body of work. Because organizational identity change has received the preponderance of attention, we first review that extensive literature. We consider the conceptual and empirical work concerning the three putative "pillars" of identity (i.e. that which is ostensibly central, enduring, and distinctive). We devote particular attention to the most controversial of these pillars-the debate pitting a view that sees identity as stable over time (a position we term as the "enduring identity proposition") and a contrasting stance that sees identity as more changeable (the "dynamic identity proposition"). Following our review of the identity change literature, we next take up a review of the notably smaller compendium of work on identity formation. We consider the conceptual and empirical work devoted to studying the external influences on, as well as the internal resources used, to fashion a nascent identity. Finally, we discuss in more depth the controversies associated with the pillars of identity, assess the four prevalent views on organizational identity (the social construction, social actor, institutionalist, and population ecologist views), assimilate the research on both identity formation and change, and consider the prospects for future work on both phenomena.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873938689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873938689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19416520.2013.762225

DO - 10.1080/19416520.2013.762225

M3 - Article

JO - Academy of Management Annals

JF - Academy of Management Annals

SN - 1941-6520

ER -