Organic farmers or conventional farmers: Where's the money?

Hiroki Uematsu, Ashok Mishra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is growing evidence that organic farming is a rapidly expanding economic sector in the U.S. However, an unanswered question is whether organic farmers are better off than conventional farmers when it comes to farm household income. Using large farm-level data and a matching estimator, this study explores the relationship between organic certification and farm household income with its various components. Contrary to expectations, certified organic farmers do not earn significantly higher household income than conventional farmers. Though certified organic crop producers earn higher revenue, they incur higher production expenses as well. In particular, certified organic producers spend significantly more on labor, insurance, and marketing charges than conventional farmers. The results suggest that the lack of economic incentives can be an important barrier to conversion to organic farming.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-62
Number of pages8
JournalEcological Economics
Volume78
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

household income
organic farming
farm
certification
marketing
labor
crop
Farmers
Household income
Organic farming
Farm households

Keywords

  • Average treatment effect
  • Farm household income
  • Farm revenue
  • Nearest neighbor matching
  • Organic farming
  • Propensity score matching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Organic farmers or conventional farmers : Where's the money? / Uematsu, Hiroki; Mishra, Ashok.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 78, 06.2012, p. 55-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b3ad02708fa4aed830c564149a0df7b,
title = "Organic farmers or conventional farmers: Where's the money?",
abstract = "There is growing evidence that organic farming is a rapidly expanding economic sector in the U.S. However, an unanswered question is whether organic farmers are better off than conventional farmers when it comes to farm household income. Using large farm-level data and a matching estimator, this study explores the relationship between organic certification and farm household income with its various components. Contrary to expectations, certified organic farmers do not earn significantly higher household income than conventional farmers. Though certified organic crop producers earn higher revenue, they incur higher production expenses as well. In particular, certified organic producers spend significantly more on labor, insurance, and marketing charges than conventional farmers. The results suggest that the lack of economic incentives can be an important barrier to conversion to organic farming.",
keywords = "Average treatment effect, Farm household income, Farm revenue, Nearest neighbor matching, Organic farming, Propensity score matching",
author = "Hiroki Uematsu and Ashok Mishra",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "55--62",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organic farmers or conventional farmers

T2 - Where's the money?

AU - Uematsu, Hiroki

AU - Mishra, Ashok

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - There is growing evidence that organic farming is a rapidly expanding economic sector in the U.S. However, an unanswered question is whether organic farmers are better off than conventional farmers when it comes to farm household income. Using large farm-level data and a matching estimator, this study explores the relationship between organic certification and farm household income with its various components. Contrary to expectations, certified organic farmers do not earn significantly higher household income than conventional farmers. Though certified organic crop producers earn higher revenue, they incur higher production expenses as well. In particular, certified organic producers spend significantly more on labor, insurance, and marketing charges than conventional farmers. The results suggest that the lack of economic incentives can be an important barrier to conversion to organic farming.

AB - There is growing evidence that organic farming is a rapidly expanding economic sector in the U.S. However, an unanswered question is whether organic farmers are better off than conventional farmers when it comes to farm household income. Using large farm-level data and a matching estimator, this study explores the relationship between organic certification and farm household income with its various components. Contrary to expectations, certified organic farmers do not earn significantly higher household income than conventional farmers. Though certified organic crop producers earn higher revenue, they incur higher production expenses as well. In particular, certified organic producers spend significantly more on labor, insurance, and marketing charges than conventional farmers. The results suggest that the lack of economic incentives can be an important barrier to conversion to organic farming.

KW - Average treatment effect

KW - Farm household income

KW - Farm revenue

KW - Nearest neighbor matching

KW - Organic farming

KW - Propensity score matching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861455015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861455015&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.013

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84861455015

VL - 78

SP - 55

EP - 62

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

ER -