Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+

Martin Herold, Rosa M. Román-Cuesta, Danilo Mollicone, Yasumasa Hirata, Patrick Van Laake, Gregory P. Asner, Carlos Souza, Margaret Skutsch, Valerio Avitabile, Ken MacDicken

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measuring forest degradation and related forest carbon stock changes is more challenging than measuring deforestation since degradation implies changes in the structure of the forest and does not entail a change in land use, making it less easily detectable through remote sensing. Although we anticipate the use of the IPCC guidance under the United Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), there is no one single method for monitoring forest degradation for the case of REDD+ policy. In this review paper we highlight that the choice depends upon a number of factors including the type of degradation, available historical data, capacities and resources, and the potentials and limitations of various measurement and monitoring approaches. Current degradation rates can be measured through field data (i.e. multi-date national forest inventories and permanent sample plot data, commercial forestry data sets, proxy data from domestic markets) and/or remote sensing data (i.e. direct mapping of canopy and forest structural changes or indirect mapping through modelling approaches), with the combination of techniques providing the best options. Developing countries frequently lack consistent historical field data for assessing past forest degradation, and so must rely more on remote sensing approaches mixed with current field assessments of carbon stock changes. Historical degradation estimates will have larger uncertainties as it will be difficult to determine their accuracy. However improving monitoring capacities for systematic forest degradation estimates today will help reduce uncertainties even for historical estimates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number13
JournalCarbon Balance and Management
Volume6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 24 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

carbon emission
degradation
monitoring
remote sensing
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
carbon
forest inventory
structural change
deforestation
forestry
developing world
canopy
land use
market
resource
modeling

Keywords

  • Deforestation
  • Degradation
  • Forest
  • Global change
  • Monitoring
  • Redd+
  • Remote sensing
  • Tropical countries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+. / Herold, Martin; Román-Cuesta, Rosa M.; Mollicone, Danilo; Hirata, Yasumasa; Van Laake, Patrick; Asner, Gregory P.; Souza, Carlos; Skutsch, Margaret; Avitabile, Valerio; MacDicken, Ken.

In: Carbon Balance and Management, Vol. 6, 13, 24.11.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Herold, M, Román-Cuesta, RM, Mollicone, D, Hirata, Y, Van Laake, P, Asner, GP, Souza, C, Skutsch, M, Avitabile, V & MacDicken, K 2011, 'Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+', Carbon Balance and Management, vol. 6, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-6-13
Herold, Martin ; Román-Cuesta, Rosa M. ; Mollicone, Danilo ; Hirata, Yasumasa ; Van Laake, Patrick ; Asner, Gregory P. ; Souza, Carlos ; Skutsch, Margaret ; Avitabile, Valerio ; MacDicken, Ken. / Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+. In: Carbon Balance and Management. 2011 ; Vol. 6.
@article{e5cc947ee6974a3caa5cde335c4dd9c6,
title = "Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+",
abstract = "Measuring forest degradation and related forest carbon stock changes is more challenging than measuring deforestation since degradation implies changes in the structure of the forest and does not entail a change in land use, making it less easily detectable through remote sensing. Although we anticipate the use of the IPCC guidance under the United Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), there is no one single method for monitoring forest degradation for the case of REDD+ policy. In this review paper we highlight that the choice depends upon a number of factors including the type of degradation, available historical data, capacities and resources, and the potentials and limitations of various measurement and monitoring approaches. Current degradation rates can be measured through field data (i.e. multi-date national forest inventories and permanent sample plot data, commercial forestry data sets, proxy data from domestic markets) and/or remote sensing data (i.e. direct mapping of canopy and forest structural changes or indirect mapping through modelling approaches), with the combination of techniques providing the best options. Developing countries frequently lack consistent historical field data for assessing past forest degradation, and so must rely more on remote sensing approaches mixed with current field assessments of carbon stock changes. Historical degradation estimates will have larger uncertainties as it will be difficult to determine their accuracy. However improving monitoring capacities for systematic forest degradation estimates today will help reduce uncertainties even for historical estimates.",
keywords = "Deforestation, Degradation, Forest, Global change, Monitoring, Redd+, Remote sensing, Tropical countries",
author = "Martin Herold and Rom{\'a}n-Cuesta, {Rosa M.} and Danilo Mollicone and Yasumasa Hirata and {Van Laake}, Patrick and Asner, {Gregory P.} and Carlos Souza and Margaret Skutsch and Valerio Avitabile and Ken MacDicken",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1186/1750-0680-6-13",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Carbon Balance and Management",
issn = "1750-0680",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Options for monitoring and estimating historical carbon emissions from forest degradation in the context of REDD+

AU - Herold, Martin

AU - Román-Cuesta, Rosa M.

AU - Mollicone, Danilo

AU - Hirata, Yasumasa

AU - Van Laake, Patrick

AU - Asner, Gregory P.

AU - Souza, Carlos

AU - Skutsch, Margaret

AU - Avitabile, Valerio

AU - MacDicken, Ken

PY - 2011/11/24

Y1 - 2011/11/24

N2 - Measuring forest degradation and related forest carbon stock changes is more challenging than measuring deforestation since degradation implies changes in the structure of the forest and does not entail a change in land use, making it less easily detectable through remote sensing. Although we anticipate the use of the IPCC guidance under the United Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), there is no one single method for monitoring forest degradation for the case of REDD+ policy. In this review paper we highlight that the choice depends upon a number of factors including the type of degradation, available historical data, capacities and resources, and the potentials and limitations of various measurement and monitoring approaches. Current degradation rates can be measured through field data (i.e. multi-date national forest inventories and permanent sample plot data, commercial forestry data sets, proxy data from domestic markets) and/or remote sensing data (i.e. direct mapping of canopy and forest structural changes or indirect mapping through modelling approaches), with the combination of techniques providing the best options. Developing countries frequently lack consistent historical field data for assessing past forest degradation, and so must rely more on remote sensing approaches mixed with current field assessments of carbon stock changes. Historical degradation estimates will have larger uncertainties as it will be difficult to determine their accuracy. However improving monitoring capacities for systematic forest degradation estimates today will help reduce uncertainties even for historical estimates.

AB - Measuring forest degradation and related forest carbon stock changes is more challenging than measuring deforestation since degradation implies changes in the structure of the forest and does not entail a change in land use, making it less easily detectable through remote sensing. Although we anticipate the use of the IPCC guidance under the United Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), there is no one single method for monitoring forest degradation for the case of REDD+ policy. In this review paper we highlight that the choice depends upon a number of factors including the type of degradation, available historical data, capacities and resources, and the potentials and limitations of various measurement and monitoring approaches. Current degradation rates can be measured through field data (i.e. multi-date national forest inventories and permanent sample plot data, commercial forestry data sets, proxy data from domestic markets) and/or remote sensing data (i.e. direct mapping of canopy and forest structural changes or indirect mapping through modelling approaches), with the combination of techniques providing the best options. Developing countries frequently lack consistent historical field data for assessing past forest degradation, and so must rely more on remote sensing approaches mixed with current field assessments of carbon stock changes. Historical degradation estimates will have larger uncertainties as it will be difficult to determine their accuracy. However improving monitoring capacities for systematic forest degradation estimates today will help reduce uncertainties even for historical estimates.

KW - Deforestation

KW - Degradation

KW - Forest

KW - Global change

KW - Monitoring

KW - Redd+

KW - Remote sensing

KW - Tropical countries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82055171922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82055171922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1750-0680-6-13

DO - 10.1186/1750-0680-6-13

M3 - Review article

C2 - 22115360

AN - SCOPUS:82055171922

VL - 6

JO - Carbon Balance and Management

JF - Carbon Balance and Management

SN - 1750-0680

M1 - 13

ER -