Abstract
This paper analyzes the problem faced by a border protection agency if endogenous exporter abatement activities affect invasive species risk, allowing for unobservable differences in abatement cost. We show how the optimal inspection/penalty regime differs from the symmetric information case. Departing from previous literature, we allow for technical assistance, a policy instrument specifically permitted and commonly employed under Article 9 of the World Trade Organization Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement. We find the information asymmetry can make it optimal for the importing country to provide technical assistance grants for exporter risk abatement, even if it would otherwise be inefficient. Further, we show that fungibility of technical assistance with inputs in other sectors of the exporting economy affects the qualitative nature of optimal policy. If technical assistance has no outside value in the exporter's country, optimal policy is characterized by a menu of contracts balancing higher tariffs with lower penalties for being caught with an invasive. If technical assistance can be used in other sectors of the exporter's economy, it can introduce countervailing incentives making a uniform tariff/penalty combination optimal.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 27-45 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Environmental and Resource Economics |
Volume | 56 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2013 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Asymmetric information
- Inspection
- Invasive species
- Trade policy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Economics and Econometrics
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law