Once, Sometimes, or Always in Special Education: Mathematics Growth and Achievement Gaps

Ann C. Schulte, Joseph J. Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study used a statewide longitudinal sample to examine mathematics achievement gaps and growth in students with and without disabilities and to examine the impact of different methods of determining disability group membership on achievement gaps and growth. When disability status was determined on the basis of special education placement each year, the achievement gap was larger across grades than when the subgroup of students with disabilities (SWDs) was defined more broadly, including students who had exited special education or who were in special education anytime between Grades 3 and 7. Regardless of the identification criteria, the SWD subgroup showed lower average achievement and slower growth than students without disabilities. The results suggest that the present way of identifying the SWD subgroup in reporting achievement outcomes may be biased and that even students who exit special education continue to be at risk for lower mathematics achievement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-387
Number of pages18
JournalExceptional Children
Volume81
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Special Education
Mathematics
special education
disability
mathematics
Students
Growth
student
group membership
school grade
present

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Once, Sometimes, or Always in Special Education : Mathematics Growth and Achievement Gaps. / Schulte, Ann C.; Stevens, Joseph J.

In: Exceptional Children, Vol. 81, No. 3, 2015, p. 370-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schulte, Ann C. ; Stevens, Joseph J. / Once, Sometimes, or Always in Special Education : Mathematics Growth and Achievement Gaps. In: Exceptional Children. 2015 ; Vol. 81, No. 3. pp. 370-387.
@article{f6a18a20de3145cca2a16572eae743d8,
title = "Once, Sometimes, or Always in Special Education: Mathematics Growth and Achievement Gaps",
abstract = "This study used a statewide longitudinal sample to examine mathematics achievement gaps and growth in students with and without disabilities and to examine the impact of different methods of determining disability group membership on achievement gaps and growth. When disability status was determined on the basis of special education placement each year, the achievement gap was larger across grades than when the subgroup of students with disabilities (SWDs) was defined more broadly, including students who had exited special education or who were in special education anytime between Grades 3 and 7. Regardless of the identification criteria, the SWD subgroup showed lower average achievement and slower growth than students without disabilities. The results suggest that the present way of identifying the SWD subgroup in reporting achievement outcomes may be biased and that even students who exit special education continue to be at risk for lower mathematics achievement.",
author = "Schulte, {Ann C.} and Stevens, {Joseph J.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/0014402914563695",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "370--387",
journal = "Exceptional Children",
issn = "0014-4029",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Once, Sometimes, or Always in Special Education

T2 - Mathematics Growth and Achievement Gaps

AU - Schulte, Ann C.

AU - Stevens, Joseph J.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study used a statewide longitudinal sample to examine mathematics achievement gaps and growth in students with and without disabilities and to examine the impact of different methods of determining disability group membership on achievement gaps and growth. When disability status was determined on the basis of special education placement each year, the achievement gap was larger across grades than when the subgroup of students with disabilities (SWDs) was defined more broadly, including students who had exited special education or who were in special education anytime between Grades 3 and 7. Regardless of the identification criteria, the SWD subgroup showed lower average achievement and slower growth than students without disabilities. The results suggest that the present way of identifying the SWD subgroup in reporting achievement outcomes may be biased and that even students who exit special education continue to be at risk for lower mathematics achievement.

AB - This study used a statewide longitudinal sample to examine mathematics achievement gaps and growth in students with and without disabilities and to examine the impact of different methods of determining disability group membership on achievement gaps and growth. When disability status was determined on the basis of special education placement each year, the achievement gap was larger across grades than when the subgroup of students with disabilities (SWDs) was defined more broadly, including students who had exited special education or who were in special education anytime between Grades 3 and 7. Regardless of the identification criteria, the SWD subgroup showed lower average achievement and slower growth than students without disabilities. The results suggest that the present way of identifying the SWD subgroup in reporting achievement outcomes may be biased and that even students who exit special education continue to be at risk for lower mathematics achievement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84993810442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84993810442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0014402914563695

DO - 10.1177/0014402914563695

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84993810442

VL - 81

SP - 370

EP - 387

JO - Exceptional Children

JF - Exceptional Children

SN - 0014-4029

IS - 3

ER -