On the lack of good scientific reasons for the growing phylogeny/ classification gap

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An increasing number of phylogenetic analyses is no longer translated into classifications. The resulting phylogeny/classification gap is undesirable because the precise transmission of phylogenetic insights depends on the frequent revision of Linnaean names. The move away from classifying has numerous correlates. These include: an expanded pool of researchers who are able to produce phylogenetic estimates, a mismatch between the properties of molecular phylogenies and the requirements for verbal Linnaean definitions, the emphasis of statistical representations over the creation and evaluation of scientific terms, and a partial disconnect between the processes of nomenclature and taxonomy. The "taxonomic concept" approach allows systematists to express their varying perspectives with a high precision and can therefore help reduce the aforementioned gap. The phylogeny/classification link must persist in order to ensure community-wide access to, and continued testing of, the products of systematic research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)495-500
Number of pages6
JournalCladistics
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

phylogeny
phylogenetics
nomenclature
product testing
researchers
taxonomy
product
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

On the lack of good scientific reasons for the growing phylogeny/ classification gap. / Franz, Nico.

In: Cladistics, Vol. 21, No. 5, 10.2005, p. 495-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{81ed0d12800d4d2883082158009696f9,
title = "On the lack of good scientific reasons for the growing phylogeny/ classification gap",
abstract = "An increasing number of phylogenetic analyses is no longer translated into classifications. The resulting phylogeny/classification gap is undesirable because the precise transmission of phylogenetic insights depends on the frequent revision of Linnaean names. The move away from classifying has numerous correlates. These include: an expanded pool of researchers who are able to produce phylogenetic estimates, a mismatch between the properties of molecular phylogenies and the requirements for verbal Linnaean definitions, the emphasis of statistical representations over the creation and evaluation of scientific terms, and a partial disconnect between the processes of nomenclature and taxonomy. The {"}taxonomic concept{"} approach allows systematists to express their varying perspectives with a high precision and can therefore help reduce the aforementioned gap. The phylogeny/classification link must persist in order to ensure community-wide access to, and continued testing of, the products of systematic research.",
author = "Nico Franz",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00080.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "495--500",
journal = "Cladistics",
issn = "0748-3007",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the lack of good scientific reasons for the growing phylogeny/ classification gap

AU - Franz, Nico

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - An increasing number of phylogenetic analyses is no longer translated into classifications. The resulting phylogeny/classification gap is undesirable because the precise transmission of phylogenetic insights depends on the frequent revision of Linnaean names. The move away from classifying has numerous correlates. These include: an expanded pool of researchers who are able to produce phylogenetic estimates, a mismatch between the properties of molecular phylogenies and the requirements for verbal Linnaean definitions, the emphasis of statistical representations over the creation and evaluation of scientific terms, and a partial disconnect between the processes of nomenclature and taxonomy. The "taxonomic concept" approach allows systematists to express their varying perspectives with a high precision and can therefore help reduce the aforementioned gap. The phylogeny/classification link must persist in order to ensure community-wide access to, and continued testing of, the products of systematic research.

AB - An increasing number of phylogenetic analyses is no longer translated into classifications. The resulting phylogeny/classification gap is undesirable because the precise transmission of phylogenetic insights depends on the frequent revision of Linnaean names. The move away from classifying has numerous correlates. These include: an expanded pool of researchers who are able to produce phylogenetic estimates, a mismatch between the properties of molecular phylogenies and the requirements for verbal Linnaean definitions, the emphasis of statistical representations over the creation and evaluation of scientific terms, and a partial disconnect between the processes of nomenclature and taxonomy. The "taxonomic concept" approach allows systematists to express their varying perspectives with a high precision and can therefore help reduce the aforementioned gap. The phylogeny/classification link must persist in order to ensure community-wide access to, and continued testing of, the products of systematic research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745021812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745021812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00080.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2005.00080.x

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 495

EP - 500

JO - Cladistics

JF - Cladistics

SN - 0748-3007

IS - 5

ER -