On the Correspondence between the Latent Growth Curve and Latent Change Score Models

Sarfaraz Serang, Kevin Grimm, Zhiyong Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There has been a great deal of work in the literature on the equivalence between the mixed-effects modeling and structural equation modeling (SEM) frameworks in specifying growth models (Willett & Sayer, 1994). However, there has been little work on the correspondence between the latent growth curve model (LGM) and the latent change score model (see Grimm, Zhang, Hamagami, & Mazzocco, 2013). We demonstrate that four popular variants of the latent change score model–the no change, constant change, proportional change, and dual change models–have LGM equivalents. We provide equations that allow the translation of parameters from one approach to the other and vice versa. We then illustrate this equivalence using mathematics achievement data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalStructural Equation Modeling
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Growth Curve Model
Growth Curve
Correspondence
Equivalence
Mixed Effects
Structural Equation Modeling
Growth Model
equivalence
Directly proportional
say
Modeling
Model
Demonstrate
mathematics
Growth curve
Framework

Keywords

  • latent change score model
  • latent growth curve model
  • longitudinal
  • structural equation modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Decision Sciences(all)
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

On the Correspondence between the Latent Growth Curve and Latent Change Score Models. / Serang, Sarfaraz; Grimm, Kevin; Zhang, Zhiyong.

In: Structural Equation Modeling, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a10b6d10a8cb4045971d08f4376a418c,
title = "On the Correspondence between the Latent Growth Curve and Latent Change Score Models",
abstract = "There has been a great deal of work in the literature on the equivalence between the mixed-effects modeling and structural equation modeling (SEM) frameworks in specifying growth models (Willett & Sayer, 1994). However, there has been little work on the correspondence between the latent growth curve model (LGM) and the latent change score model (see Grimm, Zhang, Hamagami, & Mazzocco, 2013). We demonstrate that four popular variants of the latent change score model–the no change, constant change, proportional change, and dual change models–have LGM equivalents. We provide equations that allow the translation of parameters from one approach to the other and vice versa. We then illustrate this equivalence using mathematics achievement data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.",
keywords = "latent change score model, latent growth curve model, longitudinal, structural equation modeling",
author = "Sarfaraz Serang and Kevin Grimm and Zhiyong Zhang",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10705511.2018.1533835",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Structural Equation Modeling",
issn = "1070-5511",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Correspondence between the Latent Growth Curve and Latent Change Score Models

AU - Serang, Sarfaraz

AU - Grimm, Kevin

AU - Zhang, Zhiyong

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - There has been a great deal of work in the literature on the equivalence between the mixed-effects modeling and structural equation modeling (SEM) frameworks in specifying growth models (Willett & Sayer, 1994). However, there has been little work on the correspondence between the latent growth curve model (LGM) and the latent change score model (see Grimm, Zhang, Hamagami, & Mazzocco, 2013). We demonstrate that four popular variants of the latent change score model–the no change, constant change, proportional change, and dual change models–have LGM equivalents. We provide equations that allow the translation of parameters from one approach to the other and vice versa. We then illustrate this equivalence using mathematics achievement data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.

AB - There has been a great deal of work in the literature on the equivalence between the mixed-effects modeling and structural equation modeling (SEM) frameworks in specifying growth models (Willett & Sayer, 1994). However, there has been little work on the correspondence between the latent growth curve model (LGM) and the latent change score model (see Grimm, Zhang, Hamagami, & Mazzocco, 2013). We demonstrate that four popular variants of the latent change score model–the no change, constant change, proportional change, and dual change models–have LGM equivalents. We provide equations that allow the translation of parameters from one approach to the other and vice versa. We then illustrate this equivalence using mathematics achievement data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth.

KW - latent change score model

KW - latent growth curve model

KW - longitudinal

KW - structural equation modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056177679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056177679&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10705511.2018.1533835

DO - 10.1080/10705511.2018.1533835

M3 - Article

JO - Structural Equation Modeling

JF - Structural Equation Modeling

SN - 1070-5511

ER -