On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors”

V. Kerry Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Benefit transfer methods increasingly are being applied to value nonmarketed resources for both policy evaluation and natural resource damage litigation. This paper illustrates the need for guidelines for deciding when benefit transfer methods can be used to value changes in environmental resources. It begins by discussing applied economic modeling perspectives and relating them to benefit transfers as tools for evaluating policy. It reviews the history of benefit transfers and summarizes how they are typically undertaken, including the influence of the analyst's judgments on their outcome, by comparing the development of two different analyses that use benefit transfers to consider the same issue: estimating the benefits from limiting industrial effluents discharged into specific rivers. It proposes an agenda for future benefit transfer research: devising strategies for extending available benefit transfer theory, learning from existing research, and formulating transferable versus “portable” modeling strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)685-694
Number of pages10
JournalWater Resources Research
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

resource
modeling
natural resource
learning
damage
history
economics
river
method
policy
evaluation
need
industrial effluent
change in value
litigation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors”. / Smith, V. Kerry.

In: Water Resources Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1992, p. 685-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cf2e752a29844dc69833db78f2c1100f,
title = "On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors”",
abstract = "Benefit transfer methods increasingly are being applied to value nonmarketed resources for both policy evaluation and natural resource damage litigation. This paper illustrates the need for guidelines for deciding when benefit transfer methods can be used to value changes in environmental resources. It begins by discussing applied economic modeling perspectives and relating them to benefit transfers as tools for evaluating policy. It reviews the history of benefit transfers and summarizes how they are typically undertaken, including the influence of the analyst's judgments on their outcome, by comparing the development of two different analyses that use benefit transfers to consider the same issue: estimating the benefits from limiting industrial effluents discharged into specific rivers. It proposes an agenda for future benefit transfer research: devising strategies for extending available benefit transfer theory, learning from existing research, and formulating transferable versus “portable” modeling strategies.",
author = "Smith, {V. Kerry}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1029/91WR02594",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "685--694",
journal = "Water Resources Research",
issn = "0043-1397",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On separating defensible benefit transfers from “smoke and mirrors”

AU - Smith, V. Kerry

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Benefit transfer methods increasingly are being applied to value nonmarketed resources for both policy evaluation and natural resource damage litigation. This paper illustrates the need for guidelines for deciding when benefit transfer methods can be used to value changes in environmental resources. It begins by discussing applied economic modeling perspectives and relating them to benefit transfers as tools for evaluating policy. It reviews the history of benefit transfers and summarizes how they are typically undertaken, including the influence of the analyst's judgments on their outcome, by comparing the development of two different analyses that use benefit transfers to consider the same issue: estimating the benefits from limiting industrial effluents discharged into specific rivers. It proposes an agenda for future benefit transfer research: devising strategies for extending available benefit transfer theory, learning from existing research, and formulating transferable versus “portable” modeling strategies.

AB - Benefit transfer methods increasingly are being applied to value nonmarketed resources for both policy evaluation and natural resource damage litigation. This paper illustrates the need for guidelines for deciding when benefit transfer methods can be used to value changes in environmental resources. It begins by discussing applied economic modeling perspectives and relating them to benefit transfers as tools for evaluating policy. It reviews the history of benefit transfers and summarizes how they are typically undertaken, including the influence of the analyst's judgments on their outcome, by comparing the development of two different analyses that use benefit transfers to consider the same issue: estimating the benefits from limiting industrial effluents discharged into specific rivers. It proposes an agenda for future benefit transfer research: devising strategies for extending available benefit transfer theory, learning from existing research, and formulating transferable versus “portable” modeling strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945092361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945092361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/91WR02594

DO - 10.1029/91WR02594

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 685

EP - 694

JO - Water Resources Research

JF - Water Resources Research

SN - 0043-1397

IS - 3

ER -