On priming action: Conclusions from a meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally-presented words

Evan Weingarten; Qijia Chen; Maxwell McAdams; Jessica Yi; Justin Hepler; Dolores Albarracin

doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.015

On priming action: Conclusions from a meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally-presented words

Evan Weingarten, Qijia Chen, Maxwell McAdams, Jessica Yi, Justin Hepler, Dolores Albarracin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper presents a summary of the conclusions drawn from a meta-analysis of the behavioral impact of presenting words connected to an action or a goal representation [1]. The average and distribution of 352 effect sizes from 133 studies (84 reports) revealed a small behavioral priming effect (d_YE = 0.332, d_RE = 0.352), which was robust across methodological procedures and only minimally biased by the publication of positive (vs. negative) results. More valued behavior or goal concepts (e.g. associated with important outcomes or values) were associated with stronger priming effects than were less valued behaviors. In addition, opportunities for goal satisfaction appeared to decrease priming effects.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	53-57
Number of pages	5
Journal	Current Opinion in Psychology
Volume	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.015
State	Published - Dec 1 2016
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Psychology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.015

Cite this

@article{b155b5d13b9241a9bd3bdff07725ae35,

title = "On priming action: Conclusions from a meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally-presented words",

abstract = "This paper presents a summary of the conclusions drawn from a meta-analysis of the behavioral impact of presenting words connected to an action or a goal representation [1]. The average and distribution of 352 effect sizes from 133 studies (84 reports) revealed a small behavioral priming effect (dYE = 0.332, dRE = 0.352), which was robust across methodological procedures and only minimally biased by the publication of positive (vs. negative) results. More valued behavior or goal concepts (e.g. associated with important outcomes or values) were associated with stronger priming effects than were less valued behaviors. In addition, opportunities for goal satisfaction appeared to decrease priming effects.",

author = "Evan Weingarten and Qijia Chen and Maxwell McAdams and Jessica Yi and Justin Hepler and Dolores Albarracin",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 Elsevier Ltd.",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.015",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "12",

pages = "53--57",

journal = "Current Opinion in Psychology",

issn = "2352-250X",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On priming action

T2 - Conclusions from a meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally-presented words

AU - Weingarten, Evan

AU - Chen, Qijia

AU - McAdams, Maxwell

AU - Yi, Jessica

AU - Hepler, Justin

AU - Albarracin, Dolores

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - This paper presents a summary of the conclusions drawn from a meta-analysis of the behavioral impact of presenting words connected to an action or a goal representation [1]. The average and distribution of 352 effect sizes from 133 studies (84 reports) revealed a small behavioral priming effect (dYE = 0.332, dRE = 0.352), which was robust across methodological procedures and only minimally biased by the publication of positive (vs. negative) results. More valued behavior or goal concepts (e.g. associated with important outcomes or values) were associated with stronger priming effects than were less valued behaviors. In addition, opportunities for goal satisfaction appeared to decrease priming effects.

AB - This paper presents a summary of the conclusions drawn from a meta-analysis of the behavioral impact of presenting words connected to an action or a goal representation [1]. The average and distribution of 352 effect sizes from 133 studies (84 reports) revealed a small behavioral priming effect (dYE = 0.332, dRE = 0.352), which was robust across methodological procedures and only minimally biased by the publication of positive (vs. negative) results. More valued behavior or goal concepts (e.g. associated with important outcomes or values) were associated with stronger priming effects than were less valued behaviors. In addition, opportunities for goal satisfaction appeared to decrease priming effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973442859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973442859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.015

DO - 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.015

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84973442859

SN - 2352-250X

VL - 12

SP - 53

EP - 57

JO - Current Opinion in Psychology

JF - Current Opinion in Psychology

ER -

On priming action: Conclusions from a meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally-presented words

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this