Abstract
This commentary reflects on Mumby and Stohl's essay "Disciplining Organizational Communication Studies." The author argues that Mumby and Stohl's desire to create a "birth" story for the discipline caused them to overlook two important trends among its scholars that may work to undermine the discipline's relevance: overvaluing theory relative to the empirical study of communication behavior and resisting technology both as a subject and a tool. Organizational communication scholars should work against tendencies to maintain the currency of their research enterprise.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 325-338 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Business and Technical Communication |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 2006 |
Keywords
- Behavior
- Observation
- Organizational communication
- Research methods
- Technology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Business and International Management
- Communication
- General Business, Management and Accounting