Old wine, new bottles? Using history to inform the assisted colonization debate

Johnny M. Winston, Ben Minteer, James Collins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Assisted colonization, or the translocation of species threatened with extinction to habitats outside their indigenous range (usually as a response to predicted climate shifts), is a divisive issue for conservationists. Yet, history shows that wildlife scientists were discussing the trade-offs and challenges of translocating species for conservation purposes, including introducing them to new habitats, long before anthropogenic climate change was recognized as posing a conservation problem. Here we examine a case of the scientific and policy deliberations of a high profile group of scientists and policy advisers from the 1960s (the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife's Committee on Rare and Endangered Wildlife Species) to provide a useful historical context for assessing current debates on assisted colonization. The Committee's attempt to produce a consistent policy for the 'transplantation' of threatened species illustrates how translocation debates have long hinged on an unresolved set of scientific and conceptual concerns, including the relative value of individual species and historically intact ecosystems and the philosophical status of human-assisted movement of wildlife. Bringing the Committee's deliberations to light places contemporary debates over assisted colonization in the USA in their historical context and illustrates how what often appear to be highly technical and scientific disagreements over conservation translocations are ultimately driven by deeper conceptual issues about the means and ends of conservation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)186-194
Number of pages9
JournalOryx
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

bottles
wines
wildlife
colonization
committees
history
translocation
threatened species
habitats
sports
transplantation
habitat
extinction
sport
fisheries
climate change
climate
fishery
wine
ecosystems

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • conservation history
  • conservation policy
  • threatened species
  • translocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Old wine, new bottles? Using history to inform the assisted colonization debate. / Winston, Johnny M.; Minteer, Ben; Collins, James.

In: Oryx, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2014, p. 186-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec5b79f2f9be4507a8fd81feb4ca4871,
title = "Old wine, new bottles? Using history to inform the assisted colonization debate",
abstract = "Assisted colonization, or the translocation of species threatened with extinction to habitats outside their indigenous range (usually as a response to predicted climate shifts), is a divisive issue for conservationists. Yet, history shows that wildlife scientists were discussing the trade-offs and challenges of translocating species for conservation purposes, including introducing them to new habitats, long before anthropogenic climate change was recognized as posing a conservation problem. Here we examine a case of the scientific and policy deliberations of a high profile group of scientists and policy advisers from the 1960s (the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife's Committee on Rare and Endangered Wildlife Species) to provide a useful historical context for assessing current debates on assisted colonization. The Committee's attempt to produce a consistent policy for the 'transplantation' of threatened species illustrates how translocation debates have long hinged on an unresolved set of scientific and conceptual concerns, including the relative value of individual species and historically intact ecosystems and the philosophical status of human-assisted movement of wildlife. Bringing the Committee's deliberations to light places contemporary debates over assisted colonization in the USA in their historical context and illustrates how what often appear to be highly technical and scientific disagreements over conservation translocations are ultimately driven by deeper conceptual issues about the means and ends of conservation.",
keywords = "Climate change, conservation history, conservation policy, threatened species, translocation",
author = "Winston, {Johnny M.} and Ben Minteer and James Collins",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1017/S0030605312001500",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "186--194",
journal = "Oryx",
issn = "0030-6053",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Old wine, new bottles? Using history to inform the assisted colonization debate

AU - Winston, Johnny M.

AU - Minteer, Ben

AU - Collins, James

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Assisted colonization, or the translocation of species threatened with extinction to habitats outside their indigenous range (usually as a response to predicted climate shifts), is a divisive issue for conservationists. Yet, history shows that wildlife scientists were discussing the trade-offs and challenges of translocating species for conservation purposes, including introducing them to new habitats, long before anthropogenic climate change was recognized as posing a conservation problem. Here we examine a case of the scientific and policy deliberations of a high profile group of scientists and policy advisers from the 1960s (the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife's Committee on Rare and Endangered Wildlife Species) to provide a useful historical context for assessing current debates on assisted colonization. The Committee's attempt to produce a consistent policy for the 'transplantation' of threatened species illustrates how translocation debates have long hinged on an unresolved set of scientific and conceptual concerns, including the relative value of individual species and historically intact ecosystems and the philosophical status of human-assisted movement of wildlife. Bringing the Committee's deliberations to light places contemporary debates over assisted colonization in the USA in their historical context and illustrates how what often appear to be highly technical and scientific disagreements over conservation translocations are ultimately driven by deeper conceptual issues about the means and ends of conservation.

AB - Assisted colonization, or the translocation of species threatened with extinction to habitats outside their indigenous range (usually as a response to predicted climate shifts), is a divisive issue for conservationists. Yet, history shows that wildlife scientists were discussing the trade-offs and challenges of translocating species for conservation purposes, including introducing them to new habitats, long before anthropogenic climate change was recognized as posing a conservation problem. Here we examine a case of the scientific and policy deliberations of a high profile group of scientists and policy advisers from the 1960s (the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife's Committee on Rare and Endangered Wildlife Species) to provide a useful historical context for assessing current debates on assisted colonization. The Committee's attempt to produce a consistent policy for the 'transplantation' of threatened species illustrates how translocation debates have long hinged on an unresolved set of scientific and conceptual concerns, including the relative value of individual species and historically intact ecosystems and the philosophical status of human-assisted movement of wildlife. Bringing the Committee's deliberations to light places contemporary debates over assisted colonization in the USA in their historical context and illustrates how what often appear to be highly technical and scientific disagreements over conservation translocations are ultimately driven by deeper conceptual issues about the means and ends of conservation.

KW - Climate change

KW - conservation history

KW - conservation policy

KW - threatened species

KW - translocation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902079900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902079900&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0030605312001500

DO - 10.1017/S0030605312001500

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84902079900

VL - 48

SP - 186

EP - 194

JO - Oryx

JF - Oryx

SN - 0030-6053

IS - 2

ER -