OBRA '87: has it resulted in better quality of care?

Karen Marek, M. J. Rantz, C. M. Fagin, J. W. Krejci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examines perspectives of a broad group of nursing home employees, regulators, advocates, and professional associations to describe progress made since the 1990 implementation of the Nursing Home Reform legislation (OBRA '87) and to determine whether the legislation is perceived as affecting positive change for nursing home residents. Interviews were conducted with 59 residents and 132 professional and non-professional staff in six states. Important quality of care issues of resident rights, resident dignity, restraint use, resident assessment, as well as perspectives of residents themselves are explored. In general, OBRA '87 is viewed as positive, with all groups of respondents indicating that residents have benefited from it. They identify the focus on resident rights as the most important accomplishment. Empowerment of residents through involvement in care decisions is noted by many as an important achievement. Many conclude that quality of care has improved and restraint use has decreased. The MDS is a useful tool from the standpoint of nursing home staff and regulators. This appraisal sharply contrasts their opinions about the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening tool. We believe that PASARR should be reexamined and that changes should be made in the process and/or implementation of the tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-36
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Gerontological Nursing
Volume22
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Nursing Homes
Legislation
Group Homes
Nursing Staff
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gerontology

Cite this

Marek, K., Rantz, M. J., Fagin, C. M., & Krejci, J. W. (1996). OBRA '87: has it resulted in better quality of care? Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 22(10), 28-36.

OBRA '87 : has it resulted in better quality of care? / Marek, Karen; Rantz, M. J.; Fagin, C. M.; Krejci, J. W.

In: Journal of Gerontological Nursing, Vol. 22, No. 10, 10.1996, p. 28-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marek, K, Rantz, MJ, Fagin, CM & Krejci, JW 1996, 'OBRA '87: has it resulted in better quality of care?', Journal of Gerontological Nursing, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 28-36.
Marek, Karen ; Rantz, M. J. ; Fagin, C. M. ; Krejci, J. W. / OBRA '87 : has it resulted in better quality of care?. In: Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 1996 ; Vol. 22, No. 10. pp. 28-36.
@article{391eb6e46326448a85479f7b28c3b7d3,
title = "OBRA '87: has it resulted in better quality of care?",
abstract = "This study examines perspectives of a broad group of nursing home employees, regulators, advocates, and professional associations to describe progress made since the 1990 implementation of the Nursing Home Reform legislation (OBRA '87) and to determine whether the legislation is perceived as affecting positive change for nursing home residents. Interviews were conducted with 59 residents and 132 professional and non-professional staff in six states. Important quality of care issues of resident rights, resident dignity, restraint use, resident assessment, as well as perspectives of residents themselves are explored. In general, OBRA '87 is viewed as positive, with all groups of respondents indicating that residents have benefited from it. They identify the focus on resident rights as the most important accomplishment. Empowerment of residents through involvement in care decisions is noted by many as an important achievement. Many conclude that quality of care has improved and restraint use has decreased. The MDS is a useful tool from the standpoint of nursing home staff and regulators. This appraisal sharply contrasts their opinions about the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening tool. We believe that PASARR should be reexamined and that changes should be made in the process and/or implementation of the tool.",
author = "Karen Marek and Rantz, {M. J.} and Fagin, {C. M.} and Krejci, {J. W.}",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "28--36",
journal = "Journal of Gerontological Nursing",
issn = "0098-9134",
publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - OBRA '87

T2 - has it resulted in better quality of care?

AU - Marek, Karen

AU - Rantz, M. J.

AU - Fagin, C. M.

AU - Krejci, J. W.

PY - 1996/10

Y1 - 1996/10

N2 - This study examines perspectives of a broad group of nursing home employees, regulators, advocates, and professional associations to describe progress made since the 1990 implementation of the Nursing Home Reform legislation (OBRA '87) and to determine whether the legislation is perceived as affecting positive change for nursing home residents. Interviews were conducted with 59 residents and 132 professional and non-professional staff in six states. Important quality of care issues of resident rights, resident dignity, restraint use, resident assessment, as well as perspectives of residents themselves are explored. In general, OBRA '87 is viewed as positive, with all groups of respondents indicating that residents have benefited from it. They identify the focus on resident rights as the most important accomplishment. Empowerment of residents through involvement in care decisions is noted by many as an important achievement. Many conclude that quality of care has improved and restraint use has decreased. The MDS is a useful tool from the standpoint of nursing home staff and regulators. This appraisal sharply contrasts their opinions about the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening tool. We believe that PASARR should be reexamined and that changes should be made in the process and/or implementation of the tool.

AB - This study examines perspectives of a broad group of nursing home employees, regulators, advocates, and professional associations to describe progress made since the 1990 implementation of the Nursing Home Reform legislation (OBRA '87) and to determine whether the legislation is perceived as affecting positive change for nursing home residents. Interviews were conducted with 59 residents and 132 professional and non-professional staff in six states. Important quality of care issues of resident rights, resident dignity, restraint use, resident assessment, as well as perspectives of residents themselves are explored. In general, OBRA '87 is viewed as positive, with all groups of respondents indicating that residents have benefited from it. They identify the focus on resident rights as the most important accomplishment. Empowerment of residents through involvement in care decisions is noted by many as an important achievement. Many conclude that quality of care has improved and restraint use has decreased. The MDS is a useful tool from the standpoint of nursing home staff and regulators. This appraisal sharply contrasts their opinions about the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screening tool. We believe that PASARR should be reexamined and that changes should be made in the process and/or implementation of the tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030265814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030265814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8954382

AN - SCOPUS:0030265814

VL - 22

SP - 28

EP - 36

JO - Journal of Gerontological Nursing

JF - Journal of Gerontological Nursing

SN - 0098-9134

IS - 10

ER -