Objects of O2: A posthuman analysis of differentiated language use in a cross-disciplinary research partnership

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Working across professional boundaries in cross-disciplinary research contexts is challenging work for technical and professional communicators (TPC). Utmost among the challenges in such work is the issue of access (Hannah & Arreguin, 2017). More specifically, how does a TPC obtain access, and perhaps even more concretely, what does access look like in cross-disciplinary work? Answers to these questions are difficult to find as access functions on many levels or dimensions in cross-disciplinary settings. For example, there is an immediate physical or bodily dimension to access-how do TPCs gain access to the work space and collaborators in a cross-disciplinary environment, or put another way, how are TPCs invited to be present on a team and work with other collaborators? Alternatively, from an intellectual perspective: how do TPCs access the conceptual and theoretical knowledge that is at work in a research project, the types of knowledge that are essential for substantive participation in the team’s research? Interpersonally, how do TPCs access and cultivate relationships with their collaborators, relationships that often have a long history and already formulated patterns of behavior or attitudes? Finally, as a linguistic or language concern, are TPCs able to understand and use the shared language of the project team (Anbar, Till, & Hannah, 2016; Hannah & Lam, 2016; Hannah & Saidy, 2014)?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPosthuman Praxis in Technical Communication
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages217-234
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781351203067
ISBN (Print)9780815384854
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

language
communicator
Linguistics
Cross-disciplinary
Language Use
research project
linguistics
participation
history
Collaborators
Language
Communicators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Objects of O2 : A posthuman analysis of differentiated language use in a cross-disciplinary research partnership. / Hannah, Mark.

Posthuman Praxis in Technical Communication. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 217-234.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Hannah, Mark. / Objects of O2 : A posthuman analysis of differentiated language use in a cross-disciplinary research partnership. Posthuman Praxis in Technical Communication. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 217-234
@inbook{5b1045fe7f484bf19ad1b2db38570241,
title = "Objects of O2: A posthuman analysis of differentiated language use in a cross-disciplinary research partnership",
abstract = "Working across professional boundaries in cross-disciplinary research contexts is challenging work for technical and professional communicators (TPC). Utmost among the challenges in such work is the issue of access (Hannah & Arreguin, 2017). More specifically, how does a TPC obtain access, and perhaps even more concretely, what does access look like in cross-disciplinary work? Answers to these questions are difficult to find as access functions on many levels or dimensions in cross-disciplinary settings. For example, there is an immediate physical or bodily dimension to access-how do TPCs gain access to the work space and collaborators in a cross-disciplinary environment, or put another way, how are TPCs invited to be present on a team and work with other collaborators? Alternatively, from an intellectual perspective: how do TPCs access the conceptual and theoretical knowledge that is at work in a research project, the types of knowledge that are essential for substantive participation in the team’s research? Interpersonally, how do TPCs access and cultivate relationships with their collaborators, relationships that often have a long history and already formulated patterns of behavior or attitudes? Finally, as a linguistic or language concern, are TPCs able to understand and use the shared language of the project team (Anbar, Till, & Hannah, 2016; Hannah & Lam, 2016; Hannah & Saidy, 2014)?.",
author = "Mark Hannah",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781351203074",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780815384854",
pages = "217--234",
booktitle = "Posthuman Praxis in Technical Communication",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Objects of O2

T2 - A posthuman analysis of differentiated language use in a cross-disciplinary research partnership

AU - Hannah, Mark

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Working across professional boundaries in cross-disciplinary research contexts is challenging work for technical and professional communicators (TPC). Utmost among the challenges in such work is the issue of access (Hannah & Arreguin, 2017). More specifically, how does a TPC obtain access, and perhaps even more concretely, what does access look like in cross-disciplinary work? Answers to these questions are difficult to find as access functions on many levels or dimensions in cross-disciplinary settings. For example, there is an immediate physical or bodily dimension to access-how do TPCs gain access to the work space and collaborators in a cross-disciplinary environment, or put another way, how are TPCs invited to be present on a team and work with other collaborators? Alternatively, from an intellectual perspective: how do TPCs access the conceptual and theoretical knowledge that is at work in a research project, the types of knowledge that are essential for substantive participation in the team’s research? Interpersonally, how do TPCs access and cultivate relationships with their collaborators, relationships that often have a long history and already formulated patterns of behavior or attitudes? Finally, as a linguistic or language concern, are TPCs able to understand and use the shared language of the project team (Anbar, Till, & Hannah, 2016; Hannah & Lam, 2016; Hannah & Saidy, 2014)?.

AB - Working across professional boundaries in cross-disciplinary research contexts is challenging work for technical and professional communicators (TPC). Utmost among the challenges in such work is the issue of access (Hannah & Arreguin, 2017). More specifically, how does a TPC obtain access, and perhaps even more concretely, what does access look like in cross-disciplinary work? Answers to these questions are difficult to find as access functions on many levels or dimensions in cross-disciplinary settings. For example, there is an immediate physical or bodily dimension to access-how do TPCs gain access to the work space and collaborators in a cross-disciplinary environment, or put another way, how are TPCs invited to be present on a team and work with other collaborators? Alternatively, from an intellectual perspective: how do TPCs access the conceptual and theoretical knowledge that is at work in a research project, the types of knowledge that are essential for substantive participation in the team’s research? Interpersonally, how do TPCs access and cultivate relationships with their collaborators, relationships that often have a long history and already formulated patterns of behavior or attitudes? Finally, as a linguistic or language concern, are TPCs able to understand and use the shared language of the project team (Anbar, Till, & Hannah, 2016; Hannah & Lam, 2016; Hannah & Saidy, 2014)?.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045088038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045088038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781351203074

DO - 10.4324/9781351203074

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85045088038

SN - 9780815384854

SP - 217

EP - 234

BT - Posthuman Praxis in Technical Communication

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -