Obese, fat, or "just big"? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms

Sarah Trainer, Alexandra Slade, Deborah Williams, Jose Rosales Chavez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study expands understanding of how university students use and react to fat-related terms. The study was conducted in three phases: (1) a tool development phase, (2) a survey phase, and (3) an in-depth interview phase. We highlight a few marked trends in attitude towards and use of certain tenus and words indicating larger body size, as well as the implications of these trends. Tellingly, some words are considered more negative than others. Perceived negativity significantly impacts how, where, when, and with whom such terms are used. A high degree of awareness that a term is unflattering at best and highly stigmatizing at worst does not appear to result in sensitive use of said term across all social and clinical settings. An important implication of this is that people know fat may be used behind their backs to describe them pejoratively- and regardless of any polite backpedalling in face-to-face confrontations- and this profoundly limits their social health, as well as their potential participation in health-related activities. Thus, in order to truly be effective, university-based health initiatives must not only promote healthy eating and activity behaviors but also must address fat stigma.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)266-275
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Organization
Volume74
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

young adult
health
university
trend
eating behavior
participation
interview
Fat
Young Adults
student
Health

Keywords

  • Fat stigma
  • Fat talk
  • Fat terminology
  • Obesity
  • University students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Trainer, S., Slade, A., Williams, D., & Chavez, J. R. (2015). Obese, fat, or "just big"? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms. Human Organization, 74(3), 266-275.

Obese, fat, or "just big"? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms. / Trainer, Sarah; Slade, Alexandra; Williams, Deborah; Chavez, Jose Rosales.

In: Human Organization, Vol. 74, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 266-275.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trainer, S, Slade, A, Williams, D & Chavez, JR 2015, 'Obese, fat, or "just big"? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms', Human Organization, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 266-275.
Trainer S, Slade A, Williams D, Chavez JR. Obese, fat, or "just big"? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms. Human Organization. 2015 Sep 1;74(3):266-275.
Trainer, Sarah ; Slade, Alexandra ; Williams, Deborah ; Chavez, Jose Rosales. / Obese, fat, or "just big"? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms. In: Human Organization. 2015 ; Vol. 74, No. 3. pp. 266-275.
@article{0ad706b6a9a94b188443cd36d5ddfa59,
title = "Obese, fat, or {"}just big{"}? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms",
abstract = "This study expands understanding of how university students use and react to fat-related terms. The study was conducted in three phases: (1) a tool development phase, (2) a survey phase, and (3) an in-depth interview phase. We highlight a few marked trends in attitude towards and use of certain tenus and words indicating larger body size, as well as the implications of these trends. Tellingly, some words are considered more negative than others. Perceived negativity significantly impacts how, where, when, and with whom such terms are used. A high degree of awareness that a term is unflattering at best and highly stigmatizing at worst does not appear to result in sensitive use of said term across all social and clinical settings. An important implication of this is that people know fat may be used behind their backs to describe them pejoratively- and regardless of any polite backpedalling in face-to-face confrontations- and this profoundly limits their social health, as well as their potential participation in health-related activities. Thus, in order to truly be effective, university-based health initiatives must not only promote healthy eating and activity behaviors but also must address fat stigma.",
keywords = "Fat stigma, Fat talk, Fat terminology, Obesity, University students",
author = "Sarah Trainer and Alexandra Slade and Deborah Williams and Chavez, {Jose Rosales}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "266--275",
journal = "Human Organization",
issn = "0018-7259",
publisher = "Society for Applied Anthropology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obese, fat, or "just big"? Young adult deployment of and reactions to weight terms

AU - Trainer, Sarah

AU - Slade, Alexandra

AU - Williams, Deborah

AU - Chavez, Jose Rosales

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - This study expands understanding of how university students use and react to fat-related terms. The study was conducted in three phases: (1) a tool development phase, (2) a survey phase, and (3) an in-depth interview phase. We highlight a few marked trends in attitude towards and use of certain tenus and words indicating larger body size, as well as the implications of these trends. Tellingly, some words are considered more negative than others. Perceived negativity significantly impacts how, where, when, and with whom such terms are used. A high degree of awareness that a term is unflattering at best and highly stigmatizing at worst does not appear to result in sensitive use of said term across all social and clinical settings. An important implication of this is that people know fat may be used behind their backs to describe them pejoratively- and regardless of any polite backpedalling in face-to-face confrontations- and this profoundly limits their social health, as well as their potential participation in health-related activities. Thus, in order to truly be effective, university-based health initiatives must not only promote healthy eating and activity behaviors but also must address fat stigma.

AB - This study expands understanding of how university students use and react to fat-related terms. The study was conducted in three phases: (1) a tool development phase, (2) a survey phase, and (3) an in-depth interview phase. We highlight a few marked trends in attitude towards and use of certain tenus and words indicating larger body size, as well as the implications of these trends. Tellingly, some words are considered more negative than others. Perceived negativity significantly impacts how, where, when, and with whom such terms are used. A high degree of awareness that a term is unflattering at best and highly stigmatizing at worst does not appear to result in sensitive use of said term across all social and clinical settings. An important implication of this is that people know fat may be used behind their backs to describe them pejoratively- and regardless of any polite backpedalling in face-to-face confrontations- and this profoundly limits their social health, as well as their potential participation in health-related activities. Thus, in order to truly be effective, university-based health initiatives must not only promote healthy eating and activity behaviors but also must address fat stigma.

KW - Fat stigma

KW - Fat talk

KW - Fat terminology

KW - Obesity

KW - University students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987819092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987819092&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 266

EP - 275

JO - Human Organization

JF - Human Organization

SN - 0018-7259

IS - 3

ER -