Nurses' sharps, including needlestick, injuries in public and private healthcare facilities in New South Wales, Australia

Maya Guest, Ashley K. Kable, May Boggess, Mark Friedewald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The aim of this paper is to determine factors associated with sharps-related injury rates in nurses by analysing the combined data from two state-wide cross-sectional studies of nurses and comparing rates between public and private sectors and between different nurse practice areas in NSW. Methods The data from two studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 were combined for 44 similar data items and for similar nurse participants (registered nurses, registered midwives and enrolled nurses). Both studies had recruited nurses from membership of the NSW Nurses' Association. Data for 256 and 1100 participants respectively were combined for this comparative analysis. Results The sharps-related annual injury rate was 7.2% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.7). It was significantly higher in operating theatres, renal, mental health and paediatric practice areas in private compared with public facilities (17.9% versus 5.2%). Positive aspects of sharps safety practices included: 90% of nurses reported their injuries, were aware of processes required for dealing with sharps injuries and found their managers to be approachable. Areas for improvement included the provision of information about persons responsible for follow-up (21% unsure), increased provision of safety-engineered medical devices (SEMDs) (50% not available), decreased provision of non-SEMDs (75% available) and a focus on the highly-resistant practice of recapping needles (35% report recapping non-SEMDs). Conclusions There are significant differences in sharps-related injuries between public and private facilities. Opportunities exist to improve safety practices across various nursing practice environments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-75
Number of pages11
JournalHealthcare Infection
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Needlestick Injuries
South Australia
New South Wales
Nurses
Delivery of Health Care
Public Facilities
Equipment Safety
Nurse Midwives
Safety
Equipment and Supplies
Private Sector
Public Sector
Wounds and Injuries
Private Facilities
Needles
Mental Health
Nursing
Cross-Sectional Studies
Pediatrics
Kidney

Keywords

  • health and safety
  • healthcare-acquired infection
  • needlestick injuries
  • nursing
  • occupational exposure
  • occupational health.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Nurses' sharps, including needlestick, injuries in public and private healthcare facilities in New South Wales, Australia. / Guest, Maya; Kable, Ashley K.; Boggess, May; Friedewald, Mark.

In: Healthcare Infection, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2014, p. 65-75.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{918f493b1d7247ccbd3764a70dba4590,
title = "Nurses' sharps, including needlestick, injuries in public and private healthcare facilities in New South Wales, Australia",
abstract = "Background The aim of this paper is to determine factors associated with sharps-related injury rates in nurses by analysing the combined data from two state-wide cross-sectional studies of nurses and comparing rates between public and private sectors and between different nurse practice areas in NSW. Methods The data from two studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 were combined for 44 similar data items and for similar nurse participants (registered nurses, registered midwives and enrolled nurses). Both studies had recruited nurses from membership of the NSW Nurses' Association. Data for 256 and 1100 participants respectively were combined for this comparative analysis. Results The sharps-related annual injury rate was 7.2{\%} (95{\%} CI: 5.9, 8.7). It was significantly higher in operating theatres, renal, mental health and paediatric practice areas in private compared with public facilities (17.9{\%} versus 5.2{\%}). Positive aspects of sharps safety practices included: 90{\%} of nurses reported their injuries, were aware of processes required for dealing with sharps injuries and found their managers to be approachable. Areas for improvement included the provision of information about persons responsible for follow-up (21{\%} unsure), increased provision of safety-engineered medical devices (SEMDs) (50{\%} not available), decreased provision of non-SEMDs (75{\%} available) and a focus on the highly-resistant practice of recapping needles (35{\%} report recapping non-SEMDs). Conclusions There are significant differences in sharps-related injuries between public and private facilities. Opportunities exist to improve safety practices across various nursing practice environments.",
keywords = "health and safety, healthcare-acquired infection, needlestick injuries, nursing, occupational exposure, occupational health.",
author = "Maya Guest and Kable, {Ashley K.} and May Boggess and Mark Friedewald",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1071/HI13044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "65--75",
journal = "Infection, Disease and Health",
issn = "2468-0451",
publisher = "Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control (ACIPC)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurses' sharps, including needlestick, injuries in public and private healthcare facilities in New South Wales, Australia

AU - Guest, Maya

AU - Kable, Ashley K.

AU - Boggess, May

AU - Friedewald, Mark

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background The aim of this paper is to determine factors associated with sharps-related injury rates in nurses by analysing the combined data from two state-wide cross-sectional studies of nurses and comparing rates between public and private sectors and between different nurse practice areas in NSW. Methods The data from two studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 were combined for 44 similar data items and for similar nurse participants (registered nurses, registered midwives and enrolled nurses). Both studies had recruited nurses from membership of the NSW Nurses' Association. Data for 256 and 1100 participants respectively were combined for this comparative analysis. Results The sharps-related annual injury rate was 7.2% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.7). It was significantly higher in operating theatres, renal, mental health and paediatric practice areas in private compared with public facilities (17.9% versus 5.2%). Positive aspects of sharps safety practices included: 90% of nurses reported their injuries, were aware of processes required for dealing with sharps injuries and found their managers to be approachable. Areas for improvement included the provision of information about persons responsible for follow-up (21% unsure), increased provision of safety-engineered medical devices (SEMDs) (50% not available), decreased provision of non-SEMDs (75% available) and a focus on the highly-resistant practice of recapping needles (35% report recapping non-SEMDs). Conclusions There are significant differences in sharps-related injuries between public and private facilities. Opportunities exist to improve safety practices across various nursing practice environments.

AB - Background The aim of this paper is to determine factors associated with sharps-related injury rates in nurses by analysing the combined data from two state-wide cross-sectional studies of nurses and comparing rates between public and private sectors and between different nurse practice areas in NSW. Methods The data from two studies conducted in 2006 and 2007 were combined for 44 similar data items and for similar nurse participants (registered nurses, registered midwives and enrolled nurses). Both studies had recruited nurses from membership of the NSW Nurses' Association. Data for 256 and 1100 participants respectively were combined for this comparative analysis. Results The sharps-related annual injury rate was 7.2% (95% CI: 5.9, 8.7). It was significantly higher in operating theatres, renal, mental health and paediatric practice areas in private compared with public facilities (17.9% versus 5.2%). Positive aspects of sharps safety practices included: 90% of nurses reported their injuries, were aware of processes required for dealing with sharps injuries and found their managers to be approachable. Areas for improvement included the provision of information about persons responsible for follow-up (21% unsure), increased provision of safety-engineered medical devices (SEMDs) (50% not available), decreased provision of non-SEMDs (75% available) and a focus on the highly-resistant practice of recapping needles (35% report recapping non-SEMDs). Conclusions There are significant differences in sharps-related injuries between public and private facilities. Opportunities exist to improve safety practices across various nursing practice environments.

KW - health and safety

KW - healthcare-acquired infection

KW - needlestick injuries

KW - nursing

KW - occupational exposure

KW - occupational health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901793995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901793995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1071/HI13044

DO - 10.1071/HI13044

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84901793995

VL - 19

SP - 65

EP - 75

JO - Infection, Disease and Health

JF - Infection, Disease and Health

SN - 2468-0451

IS - 2

ER -