Nurses' informal argument

Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement

Debra Hagler, Sarah Brem

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings
Pages932-933
Number of pages2
Volume2
StatePublished - 2006
Event7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006 - Bloomington, IN, United States
Duration: Jun 27 2006Jul 1 2006

Other

Other7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006
CountryUnited States
CityBloomington, IN
Period6/27/067/1/06

Fingerprint

informal learning
Nursing
nurse
Health
Monitoring
pragmatics
nursing
monitoring
discourse
health
evidence
time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science (miscellaneous)
  • Education

Cite this

Hagler, D., & Brem, S. (2006). Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement. In ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 932-933)

Nurses' informal argument : Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement. / Hagler, Debra; Brem, Sarah.

ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings. Vol. 2 2006. p. 932-933.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Hagler, D & Brem, S 2006, Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement. in ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings. vol. 2, pp. 932-933, 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006, Bloomington, IN, United States, 6/27/06.
Hagler D, Brem S. Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement. In ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings. Vol. 2. 2006. p. 932-933
Hagler, Debra ; Brem, Sarah. / Nurses' informal argument : Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement. ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings. Vol. 2 2006. pp. 932-933
@inproceedings{52b155ee863c4a89826aea5c510d0e80,
title = "Nurses' informal argument: Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement",
abstract = "Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.",
author = "Debra Hagler and Sarah Brem",
year = "2006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0805861742",
volume = "2",
pages = "932--933",
booktitle = "ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Nurses' informal argument

T2 - Learning to justify the claim and reach agreement

AU - Hagler, Debra

AU - Brem, Sarah

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.

AB - Nurses convince their peers of the need for ongoing action and monitoring during change-of-shift discourse about patient health issues. Twenty pairs of critical-care nurses participated in a qualitative study of authentic everyday argument at the bedside. The process of providing and evaluating evidence for claims and justifying decisions during nursing shift report included pragmatic and structural aspects of persuasive argument in the context of a high-stress, high-stakes, time-pressured environment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884296793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884296793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 0805861742

SN - 9780805861747

VL - 2

SP - 932

EP - 933

BT - ICLS 2006 - International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Proceedings

ER -