Abstract
The important goals of Magnet hospitals are to create supportive professional nursing care environments. A recently published paper found little difference in work environments between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether work environments, staffing, and nurse outcomes differ between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. A secondary analysis of data from a 4-state survey of 26,276 nurses in 567 acute care hospitals to evaluate differences in work environments and nurse outcomes in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals was conducted. Magnet hospitals had significantly better work environments (t = -5.29, P < .001) and more highly educated nurses (t = -2.27, P < .001). Magnet hospital nurses were 18% less likely to be dissatisfied with their job (P < .05) and 13% less likely to report high burnout (P < .05). Magnet hospitals have significantly better work environments than non-Magnet hospitals. The better work environments of Magnet hospitals are associated with lower levels of nurse job dissatisfaction and burnout.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 428-433 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Nursing Administration |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Leadership and Management
Cite this
Nurse outcomes in magnet® and non-magnet hospitals. / Kelly, Lesly; McHugh, Matthew D.; Aiken, Linda H.
In: Journal of Nursing Administration, Vol. 41, No. 10, 10.2011, p. 428-433.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Nurse outcomes in magnet® and non-magnet hospitals
AU - Kelly, Lesly
AU - McHugh, Matthew D.
AU - Aiken, Linda H.
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - The important goals of Magnet hospitals are to create supportive professional nursing care environments. A recently published paper found little difference in work environments between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether work environments, staffing, and nurse outcomes differ between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. A secondary analysis of data from a 4-state survey of 26,276 nurses in 567 acute care hospitals to evaluate differences in work environments and nurse outcomes in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals was conducted. Magnet hospitals had significantly better work environments (t = -5.29, P < .001) and more highly educated nurses (t = -2.27, P < .001). Magnet hospital nurses were 18% less likely to be dissatisfied with their job (P < .05) and 13% less likely to report high burnout (P < .05). Magnet hospitals have significantly better work environments than non-Magnet hospitals. The better work environments of Magnet hospitals are associated with lower levels of nurse job dissatisfaction and burnout.
AB - The important goals of Magnet hospitals are to create supportive professional nursing care environments. A recently published paper found little difference in work environments between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether work environments, staffing, and nurse outcomes differ between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals. A secondary analysis of data from a 4-state survey of 26,276 nurses in 567 acute care hospitals to evaluate differences in work environments and nurse outcomes in Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals was conducted. Magnet hospitals had significantly better work environments (t = -5.29, P < .001) and more highly educated nurses (t = -2.27, P < .001). Magnet hospital nurses were 18% less likely to be dissatisfied with their job (P < .05) and 13% less likely to report high burnout (P < .05). Magnet hospitals have significantly better work environments than non-Magnet hospitals. The better work environments of Magnet hospitals are associated with lower levels of nurse job dissatisfaction and burnout.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80155183458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80155183458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822eddbc
DO - 10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822eddbc
M3 - Article
C2 - 21934430
AN - SCOPUS:80155183458
VL - 41
SP - 428
EP - 433
JO - Journal of Nursing Administration
JF - Journal of Nursing Administration
SN - 0002-0443
IS - 10
ER -