Null subjects in old English

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I review the proposal made by SigurLsson (2011) that null arguments follow from third-factor principles, as in Chomsky 2005. A number of issues remain unclear: for instance, the kind of topic that licenses null arguments in Modern Germanic, including Modern English. I argue that Old English is pro drop and add to the discussion Frascarelli (2007) started as to which topic licenses a null subject. I agree with Frascarelli and Hinterhölzl (2007) that the licensing topic in Modern Germanic and Old English is an aboutness-shift topic. I also argue that verb movement to C is necessary to license the empty argument in the modern Germanic languages (including Modern English), but not in Old English, since agreement is still responsible for licensing in that language, as in Italian.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)271-285
Number of pages15
JournalLinguistic Inquiry
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

license
language
Old English
Null Subject
Licensing
Germanic Languages
Language
Verb Movement
Noam Chomsky
Pro-drop
Aboutness

Keywords

  • Edge linking
  • Germanic
  • Modern English
  • Old English
  • Pro drop
  • Topic drop

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Null subjects in old English. / Van Gelderen, Elly.

In: Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 44, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 271-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Gelderen, Elly. / Null subjects in old English. In: Linguistic Inquiry. 2013 ; Vol. 44, No. 2. pp. 271-285.
@article{95ef8ede52af4d4baf739ecfe5e1aac7,
title = "Null subjects in old English",
abstract = "I review the proposal made by SigurLsson (2011) that null arguments follow from third-factor principles, as in Chomsky 2005. A number of issues remain unclear: for instance, the kind of topic that licenses null arguments in Modern Germanic, including Modern English. I argue that Old English is pro drop and add to the discussion Frascarelli (2007) started as to which topic licenses a null subject. I agree with Frascarelli and Hinterh{\"o}lzl (2007) that the licensing topic in Modern Germanic and Old English is an aboutness-shift topic. I also argue that verb movement to C is necessary to license the empty argument in the modern Germanic languages (including Modern English), but not in Old English, since agreement is still responsible for licensing in that language, as in Italian.",
keywords = "Edge linking, Germanic, Modern English, Old English, Pro drop, Topic drop",
author = "{Van Gelderen}, Elly",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1162/LING_a_00127",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "271--285",
journal = "Linguistic Inquiry",
issn = "0024-3892",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Null subjects in old English

AU - Van Gelderen, Elly

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - I review the proposal made by SigurLsson (2011) that null arguments follow from third-factor principles, as in Chomsky 2005. A number of issues remain unclear: for instance, the kind of topic that licenses null arguments in Modern Germanic, including Modern English. I argue that Old English is pro drop and add to the discussion Frascarelli (2007) started as to which topic licenses a null subject. I agree with Frascarelli and Hinterhölzl (2007) that the licensing topic in Modern Germanic and Old English is an aboutness-shift topic. I also argue that verb movement to C is necessary to license the empty argument in the modern Germanic languages (including Modern English), but not in Old English, since agreement is still responsible for licensing in that language, as in Italian.

AB - I review the proposal made by SigurLsson (2011) that null arguments follow from third-factor principles, as in Chomsky 2005. A number of issues remain unclear: for instance, the kind of topic that licenses null arguments in Modern Germanic, including Modern English. I argue that Old English is pro drop and add to the discussion Frascarelli (2007) started as to which topic licenses a null subject. I agree with Frascarelli and Hinterhölzl (2007) that the licensing topic in Modern Germanic and Old English is an aboutness-shift topic. I also argue that verb movement to C is necessary to license the empty argument in the modern Germanic languages (including Modern English), but not in Old English, since agreement is still responsible for licensing in that language, as in Italian.

KW - Edge linking

KW - Germanic

KW - Modern English

KW - Old English

KW - Pro drop

KW - Topic drop

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887159324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887159324&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/LING_a_00127

DO - 10.1162/LING_a_00127

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84887159324

VL - 44

SP - 271

EP - 285

JO - Linguistic Inquiry

JF - Linguistic Inquiry

SN - 0024-3892

IS - 2

ER -