Not all Risk Taking is Born Equal: The Behavioral Agency Model and CEO's Perception of Firm Efficacy

Geoffrey Martin, Nathan Washburn, Marianna Makri, Luis Gomez-Mejia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the relationship between agent (CEO) risk bearing and the quality of executive risk-taking outcomes, by examining the contingency effect of CEO perceived firm efficacy. In doing so, we extend the behavioral agency model (BAM) beyond predictions of risk magnitude to examining how CEO risk-taking outcomes differ qualitatively in response to risk bearing. We argue that CEO risk bearing (due to stock options or cash compensation) will positively influence performance outcomes in the presence of higher perceived firm efficacy. However, this positive influence reverses when efficacy is lower. We demonstrate the utility of firm efficacy in exploring the effect of agent risk bearing on performance outcomes and provide the insight that the CEO pay-performance relationship is influenced by the CEO's perception of firm efficacy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-498
Number of pages16
JournalHuman Resource Management
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Risk-Taking
Bearings (structural)
Incentive Reimbursement
Efficacy
Chief executive officer
Agency model
Risk taking

Keywords

  • Behavioral agency
  • Perceived firm efficacy
  • R&D
  • Risk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Not all Risk Taking is Born Equal : The Behavioral Agency Model and CEO's Perception of Firm Efficacy. / Martin, Geoffrey; Washburn, Nathan; Makri, Marianna; Gomez-Mejia, Luis.

In: Human Resource Management, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.05.2015, p. 483-498.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martin, Geoffrey ; Washburn, Nathan ; Makri, Marianna ; Gomez-Mejia, Luis. / Not all Risk Taking is Born Equal : The Behavioral Agency Model and CEO's Perception of Firm Efficacy. In: Human Resource Management. 2015 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 483-498.
@article{a45fa04451db4d1b934dee26d448a256,
title = "Not all Risk Taking is Born Equal: The Behavioral Agency Model and CEO's Perception of Firm Efficacy",
abstract = "We examine the relationship between agent (CEO) risk bearing and the quality of executive risk-taking outcomes, by examining the contingency effect of CEO perceived firm efficacy. In doing so, we extend the behavioral agency model (BAM) beyond predictions of risk magnitude to examining how CEO risk-taking outcomes differ qualitatively in response to risk bearing. We argue that CEO risk bearing (due to stock options or cash compensation) will positively influence performance outcomes in the presence of higher perceived firm efficacy. However, this positive influence reverses when efficacy is lower. We demonstrate the utility of firm efficacy in exploring the effect of agent risk bearing on performance outcomes and provide the insight that the CEO pay-performance relationship is influenced by the CEO's perception of firm efficacy.",
keywords = "Behavioral agency, Perceived firm efficacy, R&D, Risk",
author = "Geoffrey Martin and Nathan Washburn and Marianna Makri and Luis Gomez-Mejia",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/hrm.21624",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "483--498",
journal = "Human Resource Management",
issn = "0090-4848",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not all Risk Taking is Born Equal

T2 - The Behavioral Agency Model and CEO's Perception of Firm Efficacy

AU - Martin, Geoffrey

AU - Washburn, Nathan

AU - Makri, Marianna

AU - Gomez-Mejia, Luis

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - We examine the relationship between agent (CEO) risk bearing and the quality of executive risk-taking outcomes, by examining the contingency effect of CEO perceived firm efficacy. In doing so, we extend the behavioral agency model (BAM) beyond predictions of risk magnitude to examining how CEO risk-taking outcomes differ qualitatively in response to risk bearing. We argue that CEO risk bearing (due to stock options or cash compensation) will positively influence performance outcomes in the presence of higher perceived firm efficacy. However, this positive influence reverses when efficacy is lower. We demonstrate the utility of firm efficacy in exploring the effect of agent risk bearing on performance outcomes and provide the insight that the CEO pay-performance relationship is influenced by the CEO's perception of firm efficacy.

AB - We examine the relationship between agent (CEO) risk bearing and the quality of executive risk-taking outcomes, by examining the contingency effect of CEO perceived firm efficacy. In doing so, we extend the behavioral agency model (BAM) beyond predictions of risk magnitude to examining how CEO risk-taking outcomes differ qualitatively in response to risk bearing. We argue that CEO risk bearing (due to stock options or cash compensation) will positively influence performance outcomes in the presence of higher perceived firm efficacy. However, this positive influence reverses when efficacy is lower. We demonstrate the utility of firm efficacy in exploring the effect of agent risk bearing on performance outcomes and provide the insight that the CEO pay-performance relationship is influenced by the CEO's perception of firm efficacy.

KW - Behavioral agency

KW - Perceived firm efficacy

KW - R&D

KW - Risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929573775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929573775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hrm.21624

DO - 10.1002/hrm.21624

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84929573775

VL - 54

SP - 483

EP - 498

JO - Human Resource Management

JF - Human Resource Management

SN - 0090-4848

IS - 3

ER -