Northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) and tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) interactions in the Colorado River basin

Pamela L. Nagler, Uyen Nguyen, Heather Bateman, Christopher J. Jarchow, Edward P. Glenn, William J. Waugh, Charles van Riper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Northern tamarisk beetles (Diorhabda carinulata) were released in the Upper Colorado River Basin in the United States in 2004–2007 to defoliate introduced tamarisk shrubs (Tamarix spp.) in the region's riparian zones. The primary purpose was to control the invasive shrub and reduce evapotranspiration (ET) by tamarisk in an attempt to increase stream flows. We evaluated beetle–tamarisk interactions with MODIS and Landsat imagery on 13 river systems, with vegetation indices used as indicators of the extent of defoliation and ET. Beetles are widespread and exhibit a pattern of colonize–defoliate–emigrate, so that riparian zones contain a mosaic of completely defoliated, partially defoliated, and refoliated tamarisk stands. Based on satellite data and ET algorithms, mean ET before beetle release (2000–2006) was 416 mm/year compared to postrelease (2007–2015) ET of 355 mm/year (p < 0.05) for a net reduction of 61 mm/year. This is lower than initial literature projections that ET would be reduced by 300–460 mm/year. Reasons for the lower-than-expected ET reductions are because baseline ET rates are lower than initially projected, and percentage ET reduction is low because tamarisk stands tend to regrow new leaves after defoliation and other plants help maintain canopy cover. Overall reductions in tamarisk green foliage during the study are 21%. However, ET in the Upper Basin has shown a steady decline since 2007 and equilibrium has not yet been reached. Defoliation is now proceeding from the Upper Basin into the Lower Basin at a rate of 40 km/year, much faster than initially projected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-359
Number of pages12
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Tamarix
Colorado River
evapotranspiration
beetle
river basin
Coleoptera
defoliation
riparian zone
riparian areas
basins
shrub
shrubs
basin
Diorhabda carinulata
moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer
Landsat
stream flow
vegetation index
foliage
river system

Keywords

  • biological control
  • Colorado Plateau
  • Diorhabda
  • endangered species
  • remote sensing
  • riparian evapotranspiration
  • saltcedar

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) and tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) interactions in the Colorado River basin. / Nagler, Pamela L.; Nguyen, Uyen; Bateman, Heather; Jarchow, Christopher J.; Glenn, Edward P.; Waugh, William J.; van Riper, Charles.

In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 26, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 348-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nagler, Pamela L. ; Nguyen, Uyen ; Bateman, Heather ; Jarchow, Christopher J. ; Glenn, Edward P. ; Waugh, William J. ; van Riper, Charles. / Northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) and tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) interactions in the Colorado River basin. In: Restoration Ecology. 2018 ; Vol. 26, No. 2. pp. 348-359.
@article{56e3893ae17c4f9bb699fdde10a7ef93,
title = "Northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) and tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) interactions in the Colorado River basin",
abstract = "Northern tamarisk beetles (Diorhabda carinulata) were released in the Upper Colorado River Basin in the United States in 2004–2007 to defoliate introduced tamarisk shrubs (Tamarix spp.) in the region's riparian zones. The primary purpose was to control the invasive shrub and reduce evapotranspiration (ET) by tamarisk in an attempt to increase stream flows. We evaluated beetle–tamarisk interactions with MODIS and Landsat imagery on 13 river systems, with vegetation indices used as indicators of the extent of defoliation and ET. Beetles are widespread and exhibit a pattern of colonize–defoliate–emigrate, so that riparian zones contain a mosaic of completely defoliated, partially defoliated, and refoliated tamarisk stands. Based on satellite data and ET algorithms, mean ET before beetle release (2000–2006) was 416 mm/year compared to postrelease (2007–2015) ET of 355 mm/year (p < 0.05) for a net reduction of 61 mm/year. This is lower than initial literature projections that ET would be reduced by 300–460 mm/year. Reasons for the lower-than-expected ET reductions are because baseline ET rates are lower than initially projected, and percentage ET reduction is low because tamarisk stands tend to regrow new leaves after defoliation and other plants help maintain canopy cover. Overall reductions in tamarisk green foliage during the study are 21{\%}. However, ET in the Upper Basin has shown a steady decline since 2007 and equilibrium has not yet been reached. Defoliation is now proceeding from the Upper Basin into the Lower Basin at a rate of 40 km/year, much faster than initially projected.",
keywords = "biological control, Colorado Plateau, Diorhabda, endangered species, remote sensing, riparian evapotranspiration, saltcedar",
author = "Nagler, {Pamela L.} and Uyen Nguyen and Heather Bateman and Jarchow, {Christopher J.} and Glenn, {Edward P.} and Waugh, {William J.} and {van Riper}, Charles",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/rec.12575",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "348--359",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Northern tamarisk beetle (Diorhabda carinulata) and tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) interactions in the Colorado River basin

AU - Nagler, Pamela L.

AU - Nguyen, Uyen

AU - Bateman, Heather

AU - Jarchow, Christopher J.

AU - Glenn, Edward P.

AU - Waugh, William J.

AU - van Riper, Charles

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Northern tamarisk beetles (Diorhabda carinulata) were released in the Upper Colorado River Basin in the United States in 2004–2007 to defoliate introduced tamarisk shrubs (Tamarix spp.) in the region's riparian zones. The primary purpose was to control the invasive shrub and reduce evapotranspiration (ET) by tamarisk in an attempt to increase stream flows. We evaluated beetle–tamarisk interactions with MODIS and Landsat imagery on 13 river systems, with vegetation indices used as indicators of the extent of defoliation and ET. Beetles are widespread and exhibit a pattern of colonize–defoliate–emigrate, so that riparian zones contain a mosaic of completely defoliated, partially defoliated, and refoliated tamarisk stands. Based on satellite data and ET algorithms, mean ET before beetle release (2000–2006) was 416 mm/year compared to postrelease (2007–2015) ET of 355 mm/year (p < 0.05) for a net reduction of 61 mm/year. This is lower than initial literature projections that ET would be reduced by 300–460 mm/year. Reasons for the lower-than-expected ET reductions are because baseline ET rates are lower than initially projected, and percentage ET reduction is low because tamarisk stands tend to regrow new leaves after defoliation and other plants help maintain canopy cover. Overall reductions in tamarisk green foliage during the study are 21%. However, ET in the Upper Basin has shown a steady decline since 2007 and equilibrium has not yet been reached. Defoliation is now proceeding from the Upper Basin into the Lower Basin at a rate of 40 km/year, much faster than initially projected.

AB - Northern tamarisk beetles (Diorhabda carinulata) were released in the Upper Colorado River Basin in the United States in 2004–2007 to defoliate introduced tamarisk shrubs (Tamarix spp.) in the region's riparian zones. The primary purpose was to control the invasive shrub and reduce evapotranspiration (ET) by tamarisk in an attempt to increase stream flows. We evaluated beetle–tamarisk interactions with MODIS and Landsat imagery on 13 river systems, with vegetation indices used as indicators of the extent of defoliation and ET. Beetles are widespread and exhibit a pattern of colonize–defoliate–emigrate, so that riparian zones contain a mosaic of completely defoliated, partially defoliated, and refoliated tamarisk stands. Based on satellite data and ET algorithms, mean ET before beetle release (2000–2006) was 416 mm/year compared to postrelease (2007–2015) ET of 355 mm/year (p < 0.05) for a net reduction of 61 mm/year. This is lower than initial literature projections that ET would be reduced by 300–460 mm/year. Reasons for the lower-than-expected ET reductions are because baseline ET rates are lower than initially projected, and percentage ET reduction is low because tamarisk stands tend to regrow new leaves after defoliation and other plants help maintain canopy cover. Overall reductions in tamarisk green foliage during the study are 21%. However, ET in the Upper Basin has shown a steady decline since 2007 and equilibrium has not yet been reached. Defoliation is now proceeding from the Upper Basin into the Lower Basin at a rate of 40 km/year, much faster than initially projected.

KW - biological control

KW - Colorado Plateau

KW - Diorhabda

KW - endangered species

KW - remote sensing

KW - riparian evapotranspiration

KW - saltcedar

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037983654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037983654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/rec.12575

DO - 10.1111/rec.12575

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037983654

VL - 26

SP - 348

EP - 359

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 2

ER -