Normalizing emotion in organizations

Making the extraordinary seem ordinary

Blake Ashforth, Glen E. Kreiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Organizations use various means of regulating socially undesirable emotions, including normalizing. We define normalizing as institutionalized processes by which extraordinary situations are rendered seemingly ordinary. Four means of normalizing are discussed: (1) diffusing, where undesired emotions are dissipated or their impact is reduced; (2) reframing, where emotions or the situation are recast such that the emotions are forestalled, redefined, or rendered more acceptable; (3) adaptation, where repeated exposure to a situation reduces its emotional impact; and (4) ritualism, where the enactment of standardized procedures provides a sense of control and a momentum of means, thereby reducing emotions. We conclude that because normalizing often has a strong "as if" or pretend quality-requiring ongoing and mutual face-work, often supported by symbolic management-it is an inherently fragile practice that is easier to sustain in groups than as individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)215-235
Number of pages21
JournalHuman Resource Management Review
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Emotions
Emotion in organizations
Emotion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Normalizing emotion in organizations : Making the extraordinary seem ordinary. / Ashforth, Blake; Kreiner, Glen E.

In: Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2002, p. 215-235.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7466dbcc13cd4d7f91b3cd9cb49e6996,
title = "Normalizing emotion in organizations: Making the extraordinary seem ordinary",
abstract = "Organizations use various means of regulating socially undesirable emotions, including normalizing. We define normalizing as institutionalized processes by which extraordinary situations are rendered seemingly ordinary. Four means of normalizing are discussed: (1) diffusing, where undesired emotions are dissipated or their impact is reduced; (2) reframing, where emotions or the situation are recast such that the emotions are forestalled, redefined, or rendered more acceptable; (3) adaptation, where repeated exposure to a situation reduces its emotional impact; and (4) ritualism, where the enactment of standardized procedures provides a sense of control and a momentum of means, thereby reducing emotions. We conclude that because normalizing often has a strong {"}as if{"} or pretend quality-requiring ongoing and mutual face-work, often supported by symbolic management-it is an inherently fragile practice that is easier to sustain in groups than as individuals.",
author = "Blake Ashforth and Kreiner, {Glen E.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00047-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "215--235",
journal = "Human Resource Management Review",
issn = "1053-4822",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normalizing emotion in organizations

T2 - Making the extraordinary seem ordinary

AU - Ashforth, Blake

AU - Kreiner, Glen E.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Organizations use various means of regulating socially undesirable emotions, including normalizing. We define normalizing as institutionalized processes by which extraordinary situations are rendered seemingly ordinary. Four means of normalizing are discussed: (1) diffusing, where undesired emotions are dissipated or their impact is reduced; (2) reframing, where emotions or the situation are recast such that the emotions are forestalled, redefined, or rendered more acceptable; (3) adaptation, where repeated exposure to a situation reduces its emotional impact; and (4) ritualism, where the enactment of standardized procedures provides a sense of control and a momentum of means, thereby reducing emotions. We conclude that because normalizing often has a strong "as if" or pretend quality-requiring ongoing and mutual face-work, often supported by symbolic management-it is an inherently fragile practice that is easier to sustain in groups than as individuals.

AB - Organizations use various means of regulating socially undesirable emotions, including normalizing. We define normalizing as institutionalized processes by which extraordinary situations are rendered seemingly ordinary. Four means of normalizing are discussed: (1) diffusing, where undesired emotions are dissipated or their impact is reduced; (2) reframing, where emotions or the situation are recast such that the emotions are forestalled, redefined, or rendered more acceptable; (3) adaptation, where repeated exposure to a situation reduces its emotional impact; and (4) ritualism, where the enactment of standardized procedures provides a sense of control and a momentum of means, thereby reducing emotions. We conclude that because normalizing often has a strong "as if" or pretend quality-requiring ongoing and mutual face-work, often supported by symbolic management-it is an inherently fragile practice that is easier to sustain in groups than as individuals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036234402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036234402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00047-5

DO - 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00047-5

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 215

EP - 235

JO - Human Resource Management Review

JF - Human Resource Management Review

SN - 1053-4822

IS - 2

ER -