Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint

Blake Ashforth, Glen E. Kreiner, Mark A. Clark, Mel Fugate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

217 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dirty work refers to occupations that are viewed by society as physically, socially, or morally tainted. Using exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from 18 dirty work occupations, we investigated the challenges of being a manager in tainted work and how managers normalize taint - that is, actively counter it or render it less salient. Managers reported experiencing role complexity and stigma awareness. Four types of practices for countering taint were revealed: occupational ideologies, social buffers, confronting clients and the public, and defensive tactics. We discuss links between these practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-174
Number of pages26
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume50
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2007

Fingerprint

Managers
Managerial work
Tactics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Normalizing dirty work : Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. / Ashforth, Blake; Kreiner, Glen E.; Clark, Mark A.; Fugate, Mel.

In: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50, No. 1, 02.2007, p. 149-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ashforth, Blake ; Kreiner, Glen E. ; Clark, Mark A. ; Fugate, Mel. / Normalizing dirty work : Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint. In: Academy of Management Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 50, No. 1. pp. 149-174.
@article{027b4f8456414a32a1da9053bcbc8f7f,
title = "Normalizing dirty work: Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint",
abstract = "Dirty work refers to occupations that are viewed by society as physically, socially, or morally tainted. Using exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from 18 dirty work occupations, we investigated the challenges of being a manager in tainted work and how managers normalize taint - that is, actively counter it or render it less salient. Managers reported experiencing role complexity and stigma awareness. Four types of practices for countering taint were revealed: occupational ideologies, social buffers, confronting clients and the public, and defensive tactics. We discuss links between these practices.",
author = "Blake Ashforth and Kreiner, {Glen E.} and Clark, {Mark A.} and Mel Fugate",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "149--174",
journal = "Academy of Management Journal",
issn = "0001-4273",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normalizing dirty work

T2 - Managerial tactics for countering occupational taint

AU - Ashforth, Blake

AU - Kreiner, Glen E.

AU - Clark, Mark A.

AU - Fugate, Mel

PY - 2007/2

Y1 - 2007/2

N2 - Dirty work refers to occupations that are viewed by society as physically, socially, or morally tainted. Using exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from 18 dirty work occupations, we investigated the challenges of being a manager in tainted work and how managers normalize taint - that is, actively counter it or render it less salient. Managers reported experiencing role complexity and stigma awareness. Four types of practices for countering taint were revealed: occupational ideologies, social buffers, confronting clients and the public, and defensive tactics. We discuss links between these practices.

AB - Dirty work refers to occupations that are viewed by society as physically, socially, or morally tainted. Using exploratory, semistructured interviews with managers from 18 dirty work occupations, we investigated the challenges of being a manager in tainted work and how managers normalize taint - that is, actively counter it or render it less salient. Managers reported experiencing role complexity and stigma awareness. Four types of practices for countering taint were revealed: occupational ideologies, social buffers, confronting clients and the public, and defensive tactics. We discuss links between these practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047225297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047225297&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34047225297

VL - 50

SP - 149

EP - 174

JO - Academy of Management Journal

JF - Academy of Management Journal

SN - 0001-4273

IS - 1

ER -