No foster child left behind

Child welfare policy perspectives on education

Nora S. Gustavsson, Ann E. MacEachron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Youth in foster care are at risk for negative educational outcomes, yet child welfare can only indirectly address these outcomes. The educational policies of the No Child Left Behind Act and Blueprint for Reform, President Obama's proposed plan to revise the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, reaffirm the positive role for multilevel parental involvement in achieving gains for disadvantaged youth. After reviewing what is known about the educational outcomes for youth in care, we examine both child welfare and educational legislation in terms of the needs of vulnerable youth. The conclusion offers recommendations on how parental involvement may be utilized as a potentially powerful force for change for youth in care, as well as specific actions state agencies and individual schools can take to support foster youth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)276-281
Number of pages6
JournalFamilies in Society
Volume92
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

foster child
child welfare
social policy
education
act
elementary education
educational policy
secondary education
president
legislation
reform
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

No foster child left behind : Child welfare policy perspectives on education. / Gustavsson, Nora S.; MacEachron, Ann E.

In: Families in Society, Vol. 92, No. 3, 07.2011, p. 276-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gustavsson, Nora S. ; MacEachron, Ann E. / No foster child left behind : Child welfare policy perspectives on education. In: Families in Society. 2011 ; Vol. 92, No. 3. pp. 276-281.
@article{042437d37de8455a93487c58f3bc7e03,
title = "No foster child left behind: Child welfare policy perspectives on education",
abstract = "Youth in foster care are at risk for negative educational outcomes, yet child welfare can only indirectly address these outcomes. The educational policies of the No Child Left Behind Act and Blueprint for Reform, President Obama's proposed plan to revise the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, reaffirm the positive role for multilevel parental involvement in achieving gains for disadvantaged youth. After reviewing what is known about the educational outcomes for youth in care, we examine both child welfare and educational legislation in terms of the needs of vulnerable youth. The conclusion offers recommendations on how parental involvement may be utilized as a potentially powerful force for change for youth in care, as well as specific actions state agencies and individual schools can take to support foster youth.",
author = "Gustavsson, {Nora S.} and MacEachron, {Ann E.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1606/1044-3894.4129",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "276--281",
journal = "Journal of social casework",
issn = "1044-3894",
publisher = "Families International Inc",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No foster child left behind

T2 - Child welfare policy perspectives on education

AU - Gustavsson, Nora S.

AU - MacEachron, Ann E.

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Youth in foster care are at risk for negative educational outcomes, yet child welfare can only indirectly address these outcomes. The educational policies of the No Child Left Behind Act and Blueprint for Reform, President Obama's proposed plan to revise the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, reaffirm the positive role for multilevel parental involvement in achieving gains for disadvantaged youth. After reviewing what is known about the educational outcomes for youth in care, we examine both child welfare and educational legislation in terms of the needs of vulnerable youth. The conclusion offers recommendations on how parental involvement may be utilized as a potentially powerful force for change for youth in care, as well as specific actions state agencies and individual schools can take to support foster youth.

AB - Youth in foster care are at risk for negative educational outcomes, yet child welfare can only indirectly address these outcomes. The educational policies of the No Child Left Behind Act and Blueprint for Reform, President Obama's proposed plan to revise the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, reaffirm the positive role for multilevel parental involvement in achieving gains for disadvantaged youth. After reviewing what is known about the educational outcomes for youth in care, we examine both child welfare and educational legislation in terms of the needs of vulnerable youth. The conclusion offers recommendations on how parental involvement may be utilized as a potentially powerful force for change for youth in care, as well as specific actions state agencies and individual schools can take to support foster youth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862019315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862019315&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1606/1044-3894.4129

DO - 10.1606/1044-3894.4129

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 276

EP - 281

JO - Journal of social casework

JF - Journal of social casework

SN - 1044-3894

IS - 3

ER -