TY - JOUR
T1 - No Easy Decisions
T2 - Developing an Evidence-Informed Process to Allocate Housing Choice Vouchers to Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence
AU - Thomas, Kristie
AU - Messing, Jill T.
AU - Ward-Lasher, Allison
AU - Bones, Allie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
PY - 2020/9/2
Y1 - 2020/9/2
N2 - This article describes the development of an evidence-informed screening tool and process to allocate 25 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) to homeless and unstably housed survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) through an innovative pilot program called SASH (Survivors Achieving Stable Housing). Informed by empirical and community-defined evidence, the screening tool comprised two forms, a survivor self-referral form and a form completed by a domestic violence (DV) advocate on the survivor’s behalf. Responses were scored such that higher scores indicated fewer barriers to the SASH definition of housing success (i.e., to lease up with and maintain an HCV). We received 92 applications, primarily from survivors living in DV shelters. Of those, 31 were excluded; the remaining 61 were randomized into either the voucher or the queue group. Survivors needed considerable advocacy from the SASH team to move through the public housing authority application process as well as financial assistance to lease up. Lessons learned during the SASH project have important implications for DV and housing practitioners, especially those involved in developing coordinated entry procedures. These lessons include the utility and feasibility of screening questions and tools, moral dilemmas of resource allocation, and challenges of working across siloed systems and policies.
AB - This article describes the development of an evidence-informed screening tool and process to allocate 25 Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) to homeless and unstably housed survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) through an innovative pilot program called SASH (Survivors Achieving Stable Housing). Informed by empirical and community-defined evidence, the screening tool comprised two forms, a survivor self-referral form and a form completed by a domestic violence (DV) advocate on the survivor’s behalf. Responses were scored such that higher scores indicated fewer barriers to the SASH definition of housing success (i.e., to lease up with and maintain an HCV). We received 92 applications, primarily from survivors living in DV shelters. Of those, 31 were excluded; the remaining 61 were randomized into either the voucher or the queue group. Survivors needed considerable advocacy from the SASH team to move through the public housing authority application process as well as financial assistance to lease up. Lessons learned during the SASH project have important implications for DV and housing practitioners, especially those involved in developing coordinated entry procedures. These lessons include the utility and feasibility of screening questions and tools, moral dilemmas of resource allocation, and challenges of working across siloed systems and policies.
KW - Housing Choice Voucher
KW - assessment
KW - domestic violence
KW - homelessness
KW - intimate partner violence
KW - screening
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087001248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087001248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10511482.2020.1755336
DO - 10.1080/10511482.2020.1755336
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087001248
SN - 1051-1482
VL - 30
SP - 783
EP - 805
JO - Housing Policy Debate
JF - Housing Policy Debate
IS - 5
ER -