TY - JOUR
T1 - Neural evidence for categorical biases in location and orientation representations in a working memory task
T2 - EEG decoding of categorical biases
AU - Bae, Gi Yeul
N1 - Funding Information:
I thank Steven J. Luck for useful comments on the earlier version of the manuscript, and Aaron Simmons for assistance with data collection. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. This study was approved by Arizona State University Institutional Review Board. The data and analysis scripts used in the present study are available online at https://osf.io/xfwe9/, Gi-Yeul Bae: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Software, Writing- Original draft, Writing-Review and Editing, Visualization
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/10/15
Y1 - 2021/10/15
N2 - Previous research demonstrated that visual representations in working memory exhibit biases with respect to the categorical structure of the stimulus space. However, a majority of those studies used behavioral measures of working memory, and it is not clear whether the working memory representations per se are influenced by the categorical structure or whether the biases arise in decision or response processes during the report. Here, I applied a multivariate decoding technique to EEG data collected during working memory tasks to determine whether neural activity associated with the representations in working memory is categorically biased prior to the report. I found that the decoding of spatial working memory was biased away from the nearest cardinal location, consistent with the biases observed in the behavioral responses. In a follow-up experiment which was designed to prevent the use of a response preparation strategy, I found that the decoding still exhibited categorical biases. Together, these results provide neural evidence that working memory representations themselves are categorically biased, imposing important constraints on the models of working memory representations.
AB - Previous research demonstrated that visual representations in working memory exhibit biases with respect to the categorical structure of the stimulus space. However, a majority of those studies used behavioral measures of working memory, and it is not clear whether the working memory representations per se are influenced by the categorical structure or whether the biases arise in decision or response processes during the report. Here, I applied a multivariate decoding technique to EEG data collected during working memory tasks to determine whether neural activity associated with the representations in working memory is categorically biased prior to the report. I found that the decoding of spatial working memory was biased away from the nearest cardinal location, consistent with the biases observed in the behavioral responses. In a follow-up experiment which was designed to prevent the use of a response preparation strategy, I found that the decoding still exhibited categorical biases. Together, these results provide neural evidence that working memory representations themselves are categorically biased, imposing important constraints on the models of working memory representations.
KW - Categorical bias
KW - EEG decoding
KW - Visual working memory
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85109451072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85109451072&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118366
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118366
M3 - Article
C2 - 34242785
AN - SCOPUS:85109451072
SN - 1053-8119
VL - 240
JO - NeuroImage
JF - NeuroImage
M1 - 118366
ER -