Networks in Public Administration: Current scholarship in review

Jesse Lecy, Ines A. Mergel, Hans Peter Schmitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Network-focused research in public administration has expanded rapidly over the past two decades. This rapid growth has created come confusion about terminology and approaches to research in the field. We organize the network literature in public administration using compact citation networks to identify coherent subdomains focused on (1) policy formation, (2) governance and (3) policy implementation. We trace how these domains differ in their approach to defining the role of networks, relationships and actors and to what extent the articles apply formal network analysis techniques. Based on a subsequent content analysis of the sample articles, we identify promising research avenues focused on the wider adoption of methods derived from social network analysis and the conditions under which networks actually deliver improved results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)643-665
Number of pages23
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public administration
Electric network analysis
Terminology
Public Administration

Keywords

  • citation analysis
  • governance
  • Network research in public administration
  • policy networks
  • snowball sampling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Networks in Public Administration : Current scholarship in review. / Lecy, Jesse; Mergel, Ines A.; Schmitz, Hans Peter.

In: Public Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 643-665.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lecy, Jesse ; Mergel, Ines A. ; Schmitz, Hans Peter. / Networks in Public Administration : Current scholarship in review. In: Public Management Review. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 5. pp. 643-665.
@article{ec654182453847d0abf4484cfda82cb0,
title = "Networks in Public Administration: Current scholarship in review",
abstract = "Network-focused research in public administration has expanded rapidly over the past two decades. This rapid growth has created come confusion about terminology and approaches to research in the field. We organize the network literature in public administration using compact citation networks to identify coherent subdomains focused on (1) policy formation, (2) governance and (3) policy implementation. We trace how these domains differ in their approach to defining the role of networks, relationships and actors and to what extent the articles apply formal network analysis techniques. Based on a subsequent content analysis of the sample articles, we identify promising research avenues focused on the wider adoption of methods derived from social network analysis and the conditions under which networks actually deliver improved results.",
keywords = "citation analysis, governance, Network research in public administration, policy networks, snowball sampling",
author = "Jesse Lecy and Mergel, {Ines A.} and Schmitz, {Hans Peter}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14719037.2012.743577",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "643--665",
journal = "Public Management Review",
issn = "1471-9037",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Networks in Public Administration

T2 - Current scholarship in review

AU - Lecy, Jesse

AU - Mergel, Ines A.

AU - Schmitz, Hans Peter

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Network-focused research in public administration has expanded rapidly over the past two decades. This rapid growth has created come confusion about terminology and approaches to research in the field. We organize the network literature in public administration using compact citation networks to identify coherent subdomains focused on (1) policy formation, (2) governance and (3) policy implementation. We trace how these domains differ in their approach to defining the role of networks, relationships and actors and to what extent the articles apply formal network analysis techniques. Based on a subsequent content analysis of the sample articles, we identify promising research avenues focused on the wider adoption of methods derived from social network analysis and the conditions under which networks actually deliver improved results.

AB - Network-focused research in public administration has expanded rapidly over the past two decades. This rapid growth has created come confusion about terminology and approaches to research in the field. We organize the network literature in public administration using compact citation networks to identify coherent subdomains focused on (1) policy formation, (2) governance and (3) policy implementation. We trace how these domains differ in their approach to defining the role of networks, relationships and actors and to what extent the articles apply formal network analysis techniques. Based on a subsequent content analysis of the sample articles, we identify promising research avenues focused on the wider adoption of methods derived from social network analysis and the conditions under which networks actually deliver improved results.

KW - citation analysis

KW - governance

KW - Network research in public administration

KW - policy networks

KW - snowball sampling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899505694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899505694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2012.743577

DO - 10.1080/14719037.2012.743577

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899505694

VL - 16

SP - 643

EP - 665

JO - Public Management Review

JF - Public Management Review

SN - 1471-9037

IS - 5

ER -