Network-based functional regions

Carson J Q Farmer, Stewart Fotheringham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For administration efficiency most countries subdivide their national territory into administrative regions. These regions are used to delineate areas which are internally well connected and relatively cohesive, especially compared with the links between regions. Hence, many countries seek to delineate local labour markets (LLMs): geographical regions where the majority of the local population seeks employment and from which the majority of local employers recruit labour. LLM boundaries are often based on functional regions, which represent the aggregate commuting patterns of the local population. A number of regionalisation procedures for objectivity delineating functional regions have been suggested, though many of these procedures require the use of ad hoc parameters to control the size and number of regions. Recently, a range of network-based alternatives have been developed in the literature. One of the most successful such methods is based on the concept of modularity: the extent to which there are dense connections within functional regions, but only sparse connections between functional regions. In this paper we maximise the modularity of a network of commuting flows to produce a regionalisation that exhibits less interaction than expected between regions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this type of regionalisation procedure on a simulated geographical network, as well as using commuting data for the Republic of Ireland. We suggest that this new method has specific advantages over existing regionalisation procedures, particularly in the context of disaggregate commuting patterns of socioeconomic subgroups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2723-2741
Number of pages19
JournalEnvironment and Planning A
Volume43
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

commuting
regionalization
local population
labor market
geographical region
objectivity
Ireland
labor
republic
employer
efficiency
interaction
method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Network-based functional regions. / Farmer, Carson J Q; Fotheringham, Stewart.

In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 43, No. 11, 2011, p. 2723-2741.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farmer, Carson J Q ; Fotheringham, Stewart. / Network-based functional regions. In: Environment and Planning A. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 11. pp. 2723-2741.
@article{1a136e80e54b4deda4aaf4338558d80c,
title = "Network-based functional regions",
abstract = "For administration efficiency most countries subdivide their national territory into administrative regions. These regions are used to delineate areas which are internally well connected and relatively cohesive, especially compared with the links between regions. Hence, many countries seek to delineate local labour markets (LLMs): geographical regions where the majority of the local population seeks employment and from which the majority of local employers recruit labour. LLM boundaries are often based on functional regions, which represent the aggregate commuting patterns of the local population. A number of regionalisation procedures for objectivity delineating functional regions have been suggested, though many of these procedures require the use of ad hoc parameters to control the size and number of regions. Recently, a range of network-based alternatives have been developed in the literature. One of the most successful such methods is based on the concept of modularity: the extent to which there are dense connections within functional regions, but only sparse connections between functional regions. In this paper we maximise the modularity of a network of commuting flows to produce a regionalisation that exhibits less interaction than expected between regions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this type of regionalisation procedure on a simulated geographical network, as well as using commuting data for the Republic of Ireland. We suggest that this new method has specific advantages over existing regionalisation procedures, particularly in the context of disaggregate commuting patterns of socioeconomic subgroups.",
author = "Farmer, {Carson J Q} and Stewart Fotheringham",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1068/a44136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "2723--2741",
journal = "Environment and Planning A",
issn = "0308-518X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Network-based functional regions

AU - Farmer, Carson J Q

AU - Fotheringham, Stewart

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - For administration efficiency most countries subdivide their national territory into administrative regions. These regions are used to delineate areas which are internally well connected and relatively cohesive, especially compared with the links between regions. Hence, many countries seek to delineate local labour markets (LLMs): geographical regions where the majority of the local population seeks employment and from which the majority of local employers recruit labour. LLM boundaries are often based on functional regions, which represent the aggregate commuting patterns of the local population. A number of regionalisation procedures for objectivity delineating functional regions have been suggested, though many of these procedures require the use of ad hoc parameters to control the size and number of regions. Recently, a range of network-based alternatives have been developed in the literature. One of the most successful such methods is based on the concept of modularity: the extent to which there are dense connections within functional regions, but only sparse connections between functional regions. In this paper we maximise the modularity of a network of commuting flows to produce a regionalisation that exhibits less interaction than expected between regions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this type of regionalisation procedure on a simulated geographical network, as well as using commuting data for the Republic of Ireland. We suggest that this new method has specific advantages over existing regionalisation procedures, particularly in the context of disaggregate commuting patterns of socioeconomic subgroups.

AB - For administration efficiency most countries subdivide their national territory into administrative regions. These regions are used to delineate areas which are internally well connected and relatively cohesive, especially compared with the links between regions. Hence, many countries seek to delineate local labour markets (LLMs): geographical regions where the majority of the local population seeks employment and from which the majority of local employers recruit labour. LLM boundaries are often based on functional regions, which represent the aggregate commuting patterns of the local population. A number of regionalisation procedures for objectivity delineating functional regions have been suggested, though many of these procedures require the use of ad hoc parameters to control the size and number of regions. Recently, a range of network-based alternatives have been developed in the literature. One of the most successful such methods is based on the concept of modularity: the extent to which there are dense connections within functional regions, but only sparse connections between functional regions. In this paper we maximise the modularity of a network of commuting flows to produce a regionalisation that exhibits less interaction than expected between regions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this type of regionalisation procedure on a simulated geographical network, as well as using commuting data for the Republic of Ireland. We suggest that this new method has specific advantages over existing regionalisation procedures, particularly in the context of disaggregate commuting patterns of socioeconomic subgroups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82755188972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82755188972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1068/a44136

DO - 10.1068/a44136

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 2723

EP - 2741

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

SN - 0308-518X

IS - 11

ER -