Neoclassical realism and small states

systemic constraints and domestic filters in Georgia’s foreign policy

Giorgi Gvalia, Bidzina Lebanidze, David Siroky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unlike structural realism, neoclassical realism focuses on how the interaction between systemic and unit-level variables influences foreign policy. This article assesses neoclassical realism against two alternative accounts–balance of threat and economic dependence–to explain change in Georgia's foreign policy. While structural realism highlights how the external security environment shapes general tendencies in foreign policy, specific strategies depend largely on unit-level factors, specifically elite cohesion and state capacity. The analysis of primary sources and exclusive interviews with high-level policy-makers suggests that neoclassical realism affords a more nuanced and precise account of foreign policy change over time than structural realism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEast European Politics
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

small state
foreign policy
realism
filter
cohesion
group cohesion
elite
economics
threat
interaction
interview

Keywords

  • democratisation
  • foreign policy
  • Georgia
  • post-communism
  • Rose Revolution
  • state building

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Neoclassical realism and small states : systemic constraints and domestic filters in Georgia’s foreign policy. / Gvalia, Giorgi; Lebanidze, Bidzina; Siroky, David.

In: East European Politics, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{709695be73134c429231823ea82c0f66,
title = "Neoclassical realism and small states: systemic constraints and domestic filters in Georgia’s foreign policy",
abstract = "Unlike structural realism, neoclassical realism focuses on how the interaction between systemic and unit-level variables influences foreign policy. This article assesses neoclassical realism against two alternative accounts–balance of threat and economic dependence–to explain change in Georgia's foreign policy. While structural realism highlights how the external security environment shapes general tendencies in foreign policy, specific strategies depend largely on unit-level factors, specifically elite cohesion and state capacity. The analysis of primary sources and exclusive interviews with high-level policy-makers suggests that neoclassical realism affords a more nuanced and precise account of foreign policy change over time than structural realism.",
keywords = "democratisation, foreign policy, Georgia, post-communism, Rose Revolution, state building",
author = "Giorgi Gvalia and Bidzina Lebanidze and David Siroky",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/21599165.2019.1581066",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "East European Politics",
issn = "2159-9165",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neoclassical realism and small states

T2 - systemic constraints and domestic filters in Georgia’s foreign policy

AU - Gvalia, Giorgi

AU - Lebanidze, Bidzina

AU - Siroky, David

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Unlike structural realism, neoclassical realism focuses on how the interaction between systemic and unit-level variables influences foreign policy. This article assesses neoclassical realism against two alternative accounts–balance of threat and economic dependence–to explain change in Georgia's foreign policy. While structural realism highlights how the external security environment shapes general tendencies in foreign policy, specific strategies depend largely on unit-level factors, specifically elite cohesion and state capacity. The analysis of primary sources and exclusive interviews with high-level policy-makers suggests that neoclassical realism affords a more nuanced and precise account of foreign policy change over time than structural realism.

AB - Unlike structural realism, neoclassical realism focuses on how the interaction between systemic and unit-level variables influences foreign policy. This article assesses neoclassical realism against two alternative accounts–balance of threat and economic dependence–to explain change in Georgia's foreign policy. While structural realism highlights how the external security environment shapes general tendencies in foreign policy, specific strategies depend largely on unit-level factors, specifically elite cohesion and state capacity. The analysis of primary sources and exclusive interviews with high-level policy-makers suggests that neoclassical realism affords a more nuanced and precise account of foreign policy change over time than structural realism.

KW - democratisation

KW - foreign policy

KW - Georgia

KW - post-communism

KW - Rose Revolution

KW - state building

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062602494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062602494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21599165.2019.1581066

DO - 10.1080/21599165.2019.1581066

M3 - Article

JO - East European Politics

JF - East European Politics

SN - 2159-9165

ER -