Neighborhood crime, the housing crisis, and geographic space

Disentangling the consequences of foreclosure and vacancy

Adam Boessen, Alyssa Chamberlain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the wake of the U.S. housing crisis, a flurry of research has examined the consequences of foreclosure for crime, and much of the literature suggests that foreclosure impacts crime through vacancy. We suggest that foreclosure and vacancy have distinct crime processes and their effects should be examined in tandem. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of foreclosure and vacancy, particularly in surrounding neighborhoods, may have different consequences for crime. We examine these questions using quarterly neighborhood data from Cleveland, Ohio, from 2006 to 2011 for both property and violent crimes. We find that foreclosures only impact crime through the broader nearby area, whereas vacancies appear to only be of consequence within the focal neighborhood. Our findings suggest distinct and spatialized differences between foreclosures and vacancies in their consequences for crime.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1122-1137
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Urban Affairs
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 17 2017

Fingerprint

foreclosure
crime
housing
offense
violent crime
spatial distribution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Neighborhood crime, the housing crisis, and geographic space : Disentangling the consequences of foreclosure and vacancy. / Boessen, Adam; Chamberlain, Alyssa.

In: Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 39, No. 8, 17.11.2017, p. 1122-1137.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e925a510bb0f492d8052393aeaae9fdd,
title = "Neighborhood crime, the housing crisis, and geographic space: Disentangling the consequences of foreclosure and vacancy",
abstract = "In the wake of the U.S. housing crisis, a flurry of research has examined the consequences of foreclosure for crime, and much of the literature suggests that foreclosure impacts crime through vacancy. We suggest that foreclosure and vacancy have distinct crime processes and their effects should be examined in tandem. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of foreclosure and vacancy, particularly in surrounding neighborhoods, may have different consequences for crime. We examine these questions using quarterly neighborhood data from Cleveland, Ohio, from 2006 to 2011 for both property and violent crimes. We find that foreclosures only impact crime through the broader nearby area, whereas vacancies appear to only be of consequence within the focal neighborhood. Our findings suggest distinct and spatialized differences between foreclosures and vacancies in their consequences for crime.",
author = "Adam Boessen and Alyssa Chamberlain",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/07352166.2017.1310558",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1122--1137",
journal = "Journal of Urban Affairs",
issn = "0735-2166",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neighborhood crime, the housing crisis, and geographic space

T2 - Disentangling the consequences of foreclosure and vacancy

AU - Boessen, Adam

AU - Chamberlain, Alyssa

PY - 2017/11/17

Y1 - 2017/11/17

N2 - In the wake of the U.S. housing crisis, a flurry of research has examined the consequences of foreclosure for crime, and much of the literature suggests that foreclosure impacts crime through vacancy. We suggest that foreclosure and vacancy have distinct crime processes and their effects should be examined in tandem. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of foreclosure and vacancy, particularly in surrounding neighborhoods, may have different consequences for crime. We examine these questions using quarterly neighborhood data from Cleveland, Ohio, from 2006 to 2011 for both property and violent crimes. We find that foreclosures only impact crime through the broader nearby area, whereas vacancies appear to only be of consequence within the focal neighborhood. Our findings suggest distinct and spatialized differences between foreclosures and vacancies in their consequences for crime.

AB - In the wake of the U.S. housing crisis, a flurry of research has examined the consequences of foreclosure for crime, and much of the literature suggests that foreclosure impacts crime through vacancy. We suggest that foreclosure and vacancy have distinct crime processes and their effects should be examined in tandem. Furthermore, the spatial distribution of foreclosure and vacancy, particularly in surrounding neighborhoods, may have different consequences for crime. We examine these questions using quarterly neighborhood data from Cleveland, Ohio, from 2006 to 2011 for both property and violent crimes. We find that foreclosures only impact crime through the broader nearby area, whereas vacancies appear to only be of consequence within the focal neighborhood. Our findings suggest distinct and spatialized differences between foreclosures and vacancies in their consequences for crime.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042664257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042664257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07352166.2017.1310558

DO - 10.1080/07352166.2017.1310558

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1122

EP - 1137

JO - Journal of Urban Affairs

JF - Journal of Urban Affairs

SN - 0735-2166

IS - 8

ER -