Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    73 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The national-level scenarios project NanoFutures focuses on the social, political, economic, and ethical implications of nanotechnology, and is initiated by the Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University (CNS-ASU). The project involves novel methods for the development of plausible visions of nanotechnology-enabled futures, elucidates public preferences for various alternatives, and, using such preferences, helps refine future visions for research and outreach. In doing so, the NanoFutures project aims to address a central question: how to deliberate the social implications of an emergent technology whose outcomes are not known. The solution pursued by the NanoFutures project is twofold. First, NanoFutures limits speculation about the technology to plausible visions. This ambition introduces a host of concerns about the limits of prediction, the nature of plausibility, and how to establish plausibility. Second, it subjects these visions to democratic assessment by a range of stakeholders, thus raising methodological questions as to who are relevant stakeholders and how to activate different communities so as to engage the far future. This article makes the dilemmas posed by decisions about such methodological issues transparent and therefore articulates the role of plausibility in anticipatory governance.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)723-737
    Number of pages15
    JournalScience and engineering ethics
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 2011

    Keywords

    • Deliberation
    • Foresight
    • Plausibility
    • Social implications of nanotechnology

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
    • Health(social science)
    • Health Policy
    • Management of Technology and Innovation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this