Negotiating gender in an engineering environment

Katherine G. Nelson, Susan Shapcott, Jenefer Husman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Despite a recent emphasis on increasing female retention in engineering, data trends indicate that such efforts have had limited success. This study considered female retention in engineering by interviewing female students about why they entered and stayed in engineering. We conducted ethnographic interviews with six female engineering students about their experience in engineering. All students were attending a summer research program at an American southwestern university. Students ranged in age (19-35 years old) and academic level (forthcoming sophomore-senior). The interviews were semi-structured and were conducted by the first author - an engineering education researcher. Using a post-positivist constructivist perceptive, themes were extracted from the interview transcripts and grouped into thematic categories related to students' perceptions of women and engineering. Even though our sample was limited, commonalities emerged in the interviews for women's engineering experiences. Thematic categories were validated using established theoretical constructs. Five thematic categories emerged from the data: discovery of engineering, interest and persistence in engineering, discrimination within engineering, gender identity, and family-career balance. The thematic categories that emerged in this study represent our participants' shared experiences that influenced their choice to pursue and remain in engineering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
PublisherAmerican Society for Engineering Education
Volume2016-June
StatePublished - Jun 26 2016
Event123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - New Orleans, United States
Duration: Jun 26 2016Jun 29 2016

Other

Other123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
CountryUnited States
CityNew Orleans
Period6/26/166/29/16

Fingerprint

Students
Engineering education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Nelson, K. G., Shapcott, S., & Husman, J. (2016). Negotiating gender in an engineering environment. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Vol. 2016-June). American Society for Engineering Education.

Negotiating gender in an engineering environment. / Nelson, Katherine G.; Shapcott, Susan; Husman, Jenefer.

2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Nelson, KG, Shapcott, S & Husman, J 2016, Negotiating gender in an engineering environment. in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. vol. 2016-June, American Society for Engineering Education, 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, United States, 6/26/16.
Nelson KG, Shapcott S, Husman J. Negotiating gender in an engineering environment. In 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June. American Society for Engineering Education. 2016
Nelson, Katherine G. ; Shapcott, Susan ; Husman, Jenefer. / Negotiating gender in an engineering environment. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vol. 2016-June American Society for Engineering Education, 2016.
@inproceedings{c1a23e11942e4b53985cd860848a7892,
title = "Negotiating gender in an engineering environment",
abstract = "Despite a recent emphasis on increasing female retention in engineering, data trends indicate that such efforts have had limited success. This study considered female retention in engineering by interviewing female students about why they entered and stayed in engineering. We conducted ethnographic interviews with six female engineering students about their experience in engineering. All students were attending a summer research program at an American southwestern university. Students ranged in age (19-35 years old) and academic level (forthcoming sophomore-senior). The interviews were semi-structured and were conducted by the first author - an engineering education researcher. Using a post-positivist constructivist perceptive, themes were extracted from the interview transcripts and grouped into thematic categories related to students' perceptions of women and engineering. Even though our sample was limited, commonalities emerged in the interviews for women's engineering experiences. Thematic categories were validated using established theoretical constructs. Five thematic categories emerged from the data: discovery of engineering, interest and persistence in engineering, discrimination within engineering, gender identity, and family-career balance. The thematic categories that emerged in this study represent our participants' shared experiences that influenced their choice to pursue and remain in engineering.",
author = "Nelson, {Katherine G.} and Susan Shapcott and Jenefer Husman",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2016-June",
booktitle = "2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition",
publisher = "American Society for Engineering Education",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Negotiating gender in an engineering environment

AU - Nelson, Katherine G.

AU - Shapcott, Susan

AU - Husman, Jenefer

PY - 2016/6/26

Y1 - 2016/6/26

N2 - Despite a recent emphasis on increasing female retention in engineering, data trends indicate that such efforts have had limited success. This study considered female retention in engineering by interviewing female students about why they entered and stayed in engineering. We conducted ethnographic interviews with six female engineering students about their experience in engineering. All students were attending a summer research program at an American southwestern university. Students ranged in age (19-35 years old) and academic level (forthcoming sophomore-senior). The interviews were semi-structured and were conducted by the first author - an engineering education researcher. Using a post-positivist constructivist perceptive, themes were extracted from the interview transcripts and grouped into thematic categories related to students' perceptions of women and engineering. Even though our sample was limited, commonalities emerged in the interviews for women's engineering experiences. Thematic categories were validated using established theoretical constructs. Five thematic categories emerged from the data: discovery of engineering, interest and persistence in engineering, discrimination within engineering, gender identity, and family-career balance. The thematic categories that emerged in this study represent our participants' shared experiences that influenced their choice to pursue and remain in engineering.

AB - Despite a recent emphasis on increasing female retention in engineering, data trends indicate that such efforts have had limited success. This study considered female retention in engineering by interviewing female students about why they entered and stayed in engineering. We conducted ethnographic interviews with six female engineering students about their experience in engineering. All students were attending a summer research program at an American southwestern university. Students ranged in age (19-35 years old) and academic level (forthcoming sophomore-senior). The interviews were semi-structured and were conducted by the first author - an engineering education researcher. Using a post-positivist constructivist perceptive, themes were extracted from the interview transcripts and grouped into thematic categories related to students' perceptions of women and engineering. Even though our sample was limited, commonalities emerged in the interviews for women's engineering experiences. Thematic categories were validated using established theoretical constructs. Five thematic categories emerged from the data: discovery of engineering, interest and persistence in engineering, discrimination within engineering, gender identity, and family-career balance. The thematic categories that emerged in this study represent our participants' shared experiences that influenced their choice to pursue and remain in engineering.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983296780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983296780&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 2016-June

BT - 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition

PB - American Society for Engineering Education

ER -