Necessary conditions for valid benefit transfers

J. Boyle Kevin, Nicolai Kuminoff, F. Parmeter Christopher, C. Pope Jaren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Benefit transfer is an approach to estimating costs and benefits of policies in the absence of original data collection. Two benefit transfer methods are capable of ensuring the analysis is theoretically consistent: preference calibration (PC) and preference function transfer (PFT), PC and PFT. Both approaches seek to estimate structural preference parameters for consumers and then transfer the corresponding utility function to the new policy application. The difference between the two methods is that PFT uses the results from a previous study to transfer a utility function whereas PC uses previous value estimates to calibrate the parameters of a utility function posited by the benefit-transfer practitioner. A partial equilibrium perspective is clearly less appropriate for large changes that may force people to adjust immediately or even relatively small changes where the incremental cost of adjustment is minimal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1328-1334
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics
Volume91
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

utility functions
Calibration
calibration
Social Adjustment
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
methodology
Transfer function
Benefit transfer
Utility function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Necessary conditions for valid benefit transfers. / Kevin, J. Boyle; Kuminoff, Nicolai; Christopher, F. Parmeter; Jaren, C. Pope.

In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 91, No. 5, 2009, p. 1328-1334.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kevin, J. Boyle ; Kuminoff, Nicolai ; Christopher, F. Parmeter ; Jaren, C. Pope. / Necessary conditions for valid benefit transfers. In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2009 ; Vol. 91, No. 5. pp. 1328-1334.
@article{e5eff9bb487a4d0dbfaaa9dce1e40749,
title = "Necessary conditions for valid benefit transfers",
abstract = "Benefit transfer is an approach to estimating costs and benefits of policies in the absence of original data collection. Two benefit transfer methods are capable of ensuring the analysis is theoretically consistent: preference calibration (PC) and preference function transfer (PFT), PC and PFT. Both approaches seek to estimate structural preference parameters for consumers and then transfer the corresponding utility function to the new policy application. The difference between the two methods is that PFT uses the results from a previous study to transfer a utility function whereas PC uses previous value estimates to calibrate the parameters of a utility function posited by the benefit-transfer practitioner. A partial equilibrium perspective is clearly less appropriate for large changes that may force people to adjust immediately or even relatively small changes where the incremental cost of adjustment is minimal.",
author = "Kevin, {J. Boyle} and Nicolai Kuminoff and Christopher, {F. Parmeter} and Jaren, {C. Pope}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01343.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "1328--1334",
journal = "American Journal of Agricultural Economics",
issn = "0002-9092",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Necessary conditions for valid benefit transfers

AU - Kevin, J. Boyle

AU - Kuminoff, Nicolai

AU - Christopher, F. Parmeter

AU - Jaren, C. Pope

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Benefit transfer is an approach to estimating costs and benefits of policies in the absence of original data collection. Two benefit transfer methods are capable of ensuring the analysis is theoretically consistent: preference calibration (PC) and preference function transfer (PFT), PC and PFT. Both approaches seek to estimate structural preference parameters for consumers and then transfer the corresponding utility function to the new policy application. The difference between the two methods is that PFT uses the results from a previous study to transfer a utility function whereas PC uses previous value estimates to calibrate the parameters of a utility function posited by the benefit-transfer practitioner. A partial equilibrium perspective is clearly less appropriate for large changes that may force people to adjust immediately or even relatively small changes where the incremental cost of adjustment is minimal.

AB - Benefit transfer is an approach to estimating costs and benefits of policies in the absence of original data collection. Two benefit transfer methods are capable of ensuring the analysis is theoretically consistent: preference calibration (PC) and preference function transfer (PFT), PC and PFT. Both approaches seek to estimate structural preference parameters for consumers and then transfer the corresponding utility function to the new policy application. The difference between the two methods is that PFT uses the results from a previous study to transfer a utility function whereas PC uses previous value estimates to calibrate the parameters of a utility function posited by the benefit-transfer practitioner. A partial equilibrium perspective is clearly less appropriate for large changes that may force people to adjust immediately or even relatively small changes where the incremental cost of adjustment is minimal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74549121006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74549121006&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01343.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01343.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:74549121006

VL - 91

SP - 1328

EP - 1334

JO - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

JF - American Journal of Agricultural Economics

SN - 0002-9092

IS - 5

ER -