Navigating the patent landscapes for nanotechnology: English gardens or tangled grounds?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The patent landscape, like a garden, can tell you much about its designers and users: their motivations, biases, and general interests. While both patent landscapes and gardens may appear to the casual observer as refined and ordered, an in-depth exploration of the terrain is likely to reveal unforeseen challenges including, for example, alien species, thickets, and trolls. As this chapter illustrates, patent landscapes are dynamic and have been forced to continually evolve in response to technological innovation. While emerging technologies such as biotechnology and information communication technology have challenged the traditional patent landscape, the overarching framework and design have largely remained intact. But will this always be the case? The aim of this chapter is to highlight how nanotechnology is challenging the existing structures and underlying foundation of the patent landscape and the implications thereof for the technology, industry, and public more generally. The chapter concludes by asking the question whether the current patent landscape will be able to withstand the ubiquitous nature of the technology, or whether nanotechnology will be a catalyst for governments and policy makers for overhauling the current landscape design.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-378
Number of pages20
JournalMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
Volume726
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Nanotechnology
Technology
Inventions
Biotechnology
Administrative Personnel
Motivation
Industry
Communication
Gardens

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{8b95710c5d00458a922bfc7b8d4feb70,
title = "Navigating the patent landscapes for nanotechnology: English gardens or tangled grounds?",
abstract = "The patent landscape, like a garden, can tell you much about its designers and users: their motivations, biases, and general interests. While both patent landscapes and gardens may appear to the casual observer as refined and ordered, an in-depth exploration of the terrain is likely to reveal unforeseen challenges including, for example, alien species, thickets, and trolls. As this chapter illustrates, patent landscapes are dynamic and have been forced to continually evolve in response to technological innovation. While emerging technologies such as biotechnology and information communication technology have challenged the traditional patent landscape, the overarching framework and design have largely remained intact. But will this always be the case? The aim of this chapter is to highlight how nanotechnology is challenging the existing structures and underlying foundation of the patent landscape and the implications thereof for the technology, industry, and public more generally. The chapter concludes by asking the question whether the current patent landscape will be able to withstand the ubiquitous nature of the technology, or whether nanotechnology will be a catalyst for governments and policy makers for overhauling the current landscape design.",
author = "Sylvester, {Douglas J.} and Bowman, {Diana M.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-61779-052-2_23",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "726",
pages = "359--378",
journal = "Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)",
issn = "1064-3745",
publisher = "Humana Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Navigating the patent landscapes for nanotechnology

T2 - English gardens or tangled grounds?

AU - Sylvester, Douglas J.

AU - Bowman, Diana M.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The patent landscape, like a garden, can tell you much about its designers and users: their motivations, biases, and general interests. While both patent landscapes and gardens may appear to the casual observer as refined and ordered, an in-depth exploration of the terrain is likely to reveal unforeseen challenges including, for example, alien species, thickets, and trolls. As this chapter illustrates, patent landscapes are dynamic and have been forced to continually evolve in response to technological innovation. While emerging technologies such as biotechnology and information communication technology have challenged the traditional patent landscape, the overarching framework and design have largely remained intact. But will this always be the case? The aim of this chapter is to highlight how nanotechnology is challenging the existing structures and underlying foundation of the patent landscape and the implications thereof for the technology, industry, and public more generally. The chapter concludes by asking the question whether the current patent landscape will be able to withstand the ubiquitous nature of the technology, or whether nanotechnology will be a catalyst for governments and policy makers for overhauling the current landscape design.

AB - The patent landscape, like a garden, can tell you much about its designers and users: their motivations, biases, and general interests. While both patent landscapes and gardens may appear to the casual observer as refined and ordered, an in-depth exploration of the terrain is likely to reveal unforeseen challenges including, for example, alien species, thickets, and trolls. As this chapter illustrates, patent landscapes are dynamic and have been forced to continually evolve in response to technological innovation. While emerging technologies such as biotechnology and information communication technology have challenged the traditional patent landscape, the overarching framework and design have largely remained intact. But will this always be the case? The aim of this chapter is to highlight how nanotechnology is challenging the existing structures and underlying foundation of the patent landscape and the implications thereof for the technology, industry, and public more generally. The chapter concludes by asking the question whether the current patent landscape will be able to withstand the ubiquitous nature of the technology, or whether nanotechnology will be a catalyst for governments and policy makers for overhauling the current landscape design.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959810659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959810659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-61779-052-2_23

DO - 10.1007/978-1-61779-052-2_23

M3 - Article

C2 - 21424461

AN - SCOPUS:79959810659

VL - 726

SP - 359

EP - 378

JO - Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)

JF - Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)

SN - 1064-3745

ER -